Appeasment?

These problems combine, which results in Liberals justifying the slaughter of innocent Americans by Muslims.

[Africa Islam... snicker snicker]

2013.11.24 (Kuka, Nigeria) - Five residents of a Christian village are shot dead by Muslim terrorists.

Only the American people can stop the unfolding disaster of the agreement with Iran, and only by the means Churchill recommended to his countrymen: with “a supreme recovery of moral health and martial vigor, we arise again and take our stand for freedom as in the olden time.”

Obama’s Munich

According to Secretary of State John Kerry, the United States enters into negotiations with Iran "with eyes absolutely wide open. We have no illusions." The historical precedents and political prudence would tell us otherwise. Here are just a few examples:

Illusion #1. Just as Iran was about to sink into chaos, the United States and its European allies offered her a helping hand. Kerry insists that if Iran violates the agreement it can be reversed and sanctions could be re-applied. The folly of this argument is that nothing in this world is more permanent than something temporary. The administration will never recognize its failure, and Obama supporters will insist on further softening the sanctions in order to provide Iran with more incentive to comply. Just as with Hitler in the 1930s, the slippery slope of appeasement will prove to be irreversible and will continue until the sanction regime crumbles or Iran obtains a nuclear bomb, whichever comes first.


Illusion #2. In Geneva, Kerry said of the agreement, "It will make our ally Israel safer." Benjamin Netanyahu, prime minister of Israel, does not share Mr. Kerry's Chamberlain-ish optimism. Netanyahu called the agreement "a historic mistake." What can John Kerry, an amateur in international diplomacy, and his boss possibly know that Benjamin Netanyahu, a highly experienced politician and a recognized expert on Middle East relations, does not? Kerry also said, "It will make our partners in the region safer." It is not clear which of the U.S. partners in the Middle East he is referring to. Netanyahu is not alone in criticizing the agreement; the Saudis do not like it, the Jordanians do not like it, and who does??? The Iranians and Syrians do, not surprisingly.


Illusion #3. Kerry said, "Put to the test what Iran's real intentions are." It seems he and the president are the only two people in the world who do not know what Iran's intentions are. Iran has been the chief world troublemaker for the last 30 years. If these two detached-from-reality peacemakers do not believe the Israelis, Saudis and Jordanians, the

Iranians leave no doubts about their intentions. Iranian Supreme Leader Khamenei attacked the United States, France and Israel, saying that "Zionist officials cannot be called humans, they are like animals," that "the Israeli regime is doomed to failure and annihilation," that the "Zionist regime" is the "rabid dog of the region." John Kerry, who suppressed his Jewishness, can afford to be dismissive but the Israelis no doubt remember Adolf Hitler's, "The Jews are definitely a race, but they are not human."

Realizing the weakness of his arguments, Kerry is desperately asking, "What is the alternative?" In doing so he is acknowledging that the administration is weak and has no stomach for stopping Iran from achieving its ultimate objective.

they only have "it is not all of them". Or the ridiculous theory it is not Islam, we don't understand.

You are doing more to support my position than I could ever ask for. I thank God for people like you.

[Africa Islam... snicker snicker]

When people point out facts that you dislike, that does not count as supporting your position.

then how could we be accepting of a nuclear Japan,

Quote:

then how could we be accepting of a nuclear Japan,

Last time I checked Japan was our ally, Iran is not.

Now if anyone would like to discuss the folly of trusting Iran........

Since geopolitics is not unidimensional, has anyone been noticing that China and Japan are jousting over the territory that some islands are on? So, if Japan decides to build a bomb pronto, we might not have anything to say. Assuming that is correct, then how could we be accepting of a nuclear Japan, but not a nuclear Iran, without making it appear that we have a double standard?
There might be more going on than one can see from one perspective.

Quote:

Now if anyone would like to discuss the folly of trusting Iran........

I trust them to behave rationally. They've never committed national suicide before, and they won't this time around. Not so sure about Israel though: they could be tempted to fight one war too many.

I assure you that Iranians are human beings, and as such, they are as rational as anyone of us. They've survived what... 3000 years of history? You can't do that and be totally irrational.