1
   

Kerry gets served up with 'waffles'

 
 
Reply Tue 13 Apr, 2004 01:54 pm
By Mark Memmott, USA TODAY

Internet pranskters have set their Web sites on Sen. John Kerry. Some jokers who don't like the Democratic presidential candidate are trying to make his campaign Web site, johnkerry.com, the first answer to a search of the word "waffles" on Google, the No. 1 Internet search engine.

They've nearly succeeded on the No. 2 search engine, Yahoo. By Sunday, eight days after the prank began, johnkerry.com was listed second among 703,000 results of a Yahoo search of the word "waffles."

At the No. 3 search engine, MSN Search, johnkerry.com was also the second Web page result of a search Sunday for "waffles."

On Google, johnkerry.com was not in the top 1,000 of the 556,000 results of a search for "waffles."

Authorities on search engines say the joke's quick impact on Yahoo and MSN, though, is a sign that the campaign is working and that Google will be affected soon.

The high-tech twist on old-fashioned political chicanery follows an Internet prank last year that still tweaks President Bush. Anti-Bush practical jokers made Bush's official biography at whitehouse.gov. the first result of a Google search of the phrase "miserable failure."

Equally clever Bush supporters came to his defense. They've made his biography the No. 1 result of a Google search for "great president."

Web-savvy jokers call a scheme to push Internet users to a specific Web site "Google bombing." It takes a coordinated effort by many Web sites and blogs. "Blog" is short for Web log, a kind of online diary.

The brains behind the waffles stunt is Ken Jacobson, a Duquesne University Law School student. He started the waffles campaign on April 3, when he first posted a blog he calls Esoteric*Diatribe (www .esoteric-diatribe.blogspot.com), which he writes on a personal computer in his Pittsburgh apartment.

"It's political fun and a bit sophomoric," says Jacobson, 23, a native of Canfield, Ohio. "But I believe George W. Bush is a man of conviction and a man of his word. I can't say the same for Sen. Kerry."

"Waffles," Jacobson says, "isn't as mean as 'miserable failure' but says something about what many people feel about Kerry," who Republicans say is a political chameleon. Jacobson says he has had no contact with the Bush campaign. The Kerry campaign had no comment about his effort.

By Sunday, 44 other Web sites and blogs were helping Jacobson.

The trick is fairly simple to accomplish. Basically, Jacobson's plan to manipulate Google will succeed if a large number of Web sites and blogs ?- no one can say how many are needed ?- "link" the word "waffles" to johnkerry.com. Anyone who clicks on that word when viewing any of those sites will be sent to Kerry's site.

One of the things that Google's software looks for when it ranks search results is how many links there are from the queried word or phrase to particular Web sites. The more links from "waffles" to Kerry's site, the greater the chance that johnkerry.com will be a top search result.

Jacobson hopes johnkerry.com is in the top 100 of Google search results for "waffles" by midsummer and No. 1 by Election Day. It took slightly more than five weeks for the "miserable failure" campaign to push Bush's biography to No. 1.

Google processes about 200 million search requests a day. It handles nearly 41% of all searches. Yahoo handles about 27%. MSN Search accounts for nearly 20%.

Chris Sherman, associate editor of SearchEngineWatch.com, a Web site that tracks the search engine industry, says, "Google is a miserable failure for allowing these things to occur." He says "a small subset of people with clear agendas" are skewing search results.

But Craig Silverstein, Google's technology director, says, "Our philosophy is that there's no need (for Google) to do anything." Even search results fueled by "Google bomb" campaigns "are appropriate," Silverstein says. "There's an association that people make from the word or phrase to the results."

Also, Silverstein says, few people are affected by search results skewed by Google bombs. "Miserable failure" isn't a term that is searched very often. "Waffle recipe" is a more likely search request than "waffles."

Sherman says the most likely reason Yahoo was affected so quickly is that it must have recently updated the "index" of Web pages it searches to include Jacobson's blog or the other sites involved in the waffles campaign.

Search engines such as Yahoo and Google constantly update their indexes, but obscure sites such as Jacobson's blog sometimes aren't detected right away by the search engines' computers. The search engines "crawl" the Internet all the time but don't scan new or rarely visited sites every day.

Yahoo does not disclose how many such pages are in its index. Google says it has 4.3 billion. Sherman says that since Yahoo has already been affected by the waffles prank, Google almost surely will be soon.

Sherman says media coverage such as this newspaper story will help Jacobson and other pranksters achieve their objectives by drawing attention to their efforts.
  • Topic Stats
  • Top Replies
  • Link to this Topic
Type: Discussion • Score: 1 • Views: 891 • Replies: 19
No top replies

 
husker
 
  1  
Reply Tue 13 Apr, 2004 02:02 pm
like this
0 Replies
 
hobitbob
 
  1  
Reply Tue 13 Apr, 2004 02:03 pm
Yum..waffles.....
http://www.bullwhackers.com/restaurant/breakfast/waffle-1.jpg
0 Replies
 
Foxfyre
 
  1  
Reply Tue 13 Apr, 2004 02:05 pm
There's a part of me that admires resourcefulness on the part of the 'bloggers'. The thing that irks me is that I use powerful search engines that reach sources you don't find on Google or Yahoo and it takes forever to pluck the legitimate information out of the all the blogs and junk a search pulls up. Throw in all the credible looking urban legends and it makes serious research much more difficult than it would otherwise be.
0 Replies
 
Craven de Kere
 
  1  
Reply Tue 13 Apr, 2004 02:06 pm
Foxfyre,

What "powerful search engines that reach sources you don't find on Google or Yahoo" are you talking about?

I ask because I work with Search Engines in a professional capacity, essentially doing this as a business (as opposed to a prank) and I know of no such bird.
0 Replies
 
husker
 
  1  
Reply Tue 13 Apr, 2004 02:22 pm
I like this conversation now Wink
0 Replies
 
nimh
 
  1  
Reply Tue 13 Apr, 2004 02:24 pm
We have a version of that in Holland, too ... if you type in raar kapsel (means: funny hairdo) in Google, you get the website of our Prime Minister on number one ... <grin>

Craven, I used to have this program installed on my computer, it would search for your query simultaneously on ten search engines and some e-mail directories ... forget its name. Sometimes helped me find stuff I hadnt gotten to thru Google itself. But only every once in a while, and it was taking valuable disk space ... so I del'd it. What was it called again .. ?
0 Replies
 
Craven de Kere
 
  1  
Reply Tue 13 Apr, 2004 02:28 pm
nimh, I bet you are talking about copernic, but I can't be sure as I know of nearly 200 such programs (some better than others).

But that's still not an example of "powerful search engines that reach sources you don't find on Google or Yahoo".

That is basically not a search engine, it's metasearch conflated by software. And it's not usually finding stuff that's not in Google it's just ranking it differently so it's giving different top-level SERPs.
0 Replies
 
husker
 
  1  
Reply Tue 13 Apr, 2004 02:32 pm
Craven you worked with these follows yet? click
0 Replies
 
Craven de Kere
 
  1  
Reply Tue 13 Apr, 2004 02:33 pm
Nope.
0 Replies
 
Craven de Kere
 
  1  
Reply Tue 13 Apr, 2004 02:34 pm
Correction re above, I know close to 100 metasearch programs, not 200 (hit the wrong key and was surprised to suddenly be saying I knew more than I did).
0 Replies
 
Foxfyre
 
  1  
Reply Tue 13 Apr, 2004 02:37 pm
Copernic is a good one. I suppose the term 'search engine' for Copernic is indeed incorrect. But there are times I need very specific information and "Ask Jeeves" and "Google" and "Yahoo" haven't come up with the answer. Type in a word or two into Copernic and wham, I've got it. I believe Yahoo is included on Copernic though...or it used to be. Guess I need to look to see what's there now Smile
0 Replies
 
Craven de Kere
 
  1  
Reply Tue 13 Apr, 2004 02:45 pm
Jsut to end my pedantry I'll say that with the alternate engines you are usually not finding things that are **not** in Google but you are finding things that are not highly ranked on Google.

i.e. it's a different ranking that's leading you to the finds and not necessarily a better index.

BTW, here are a few others to add to your top three:

http://www.gigablast.com (up and coming engine by one sole developer)

http://search.msn.com (will be a major player in less than 18 months.

http://www.teoma.com/ (Owned by Ask Jeeves, but a bit different from Ask Jeeves)

http://www.wisenut.com/ (the wisenut/looksmart search/directory combo).
0 Replies
 
husker
 
  1  
Reply Tue 13 Apr, 2004 03:00 pm
Here's some info for you guys
0 Replies
 
Foxfyre
 
  1  
Reply Tue 13 Apr, 2004 03:06 pm
Well its not important enough to argue about, but sometimes I can type a word into Google and get 'no matches'. Type the same word into Copernic and get some hits. That's the difference.
0 Replies
 
cjhsa
 
  1  
Reply Tue 13 Apr, 2004 03:08 pm
Kerry likes ketchup with his waffles.

http://politicalhumor.about.com/library/graphics/kerry_golddigger.jpg
0 Replies
 
nimh
 
  1  
Reply Tue 13 Apr, 2004 03:13 pm
Yeah, Copernic is what I meant, thanks Craven, otherwise I woulda still be thinking about it.

Foxfyre wrote:
sometimes I can type a word into Google and get 'no matches'. Type the same word into Copernic and get some hits.


Yeah, I had the same. Not often (not often enough to keep the software), but every once in a while.
0 Replies
 
Craven de Kere
 
  1  
Reply Tue 13 Apr, 2004 03:33 pm
That might have been before Google started "stemming" queries (they recently started stemming).
0 Replies
 
Tarantulas
 
  1  
Reply Tue 13 Apr, 2004 05:32 pm
LOL @ cjhsa
0 Replies
 
suzy
 
  1  
Reply Tue 13 Apr, 2004 09:06 pm
How clever.
0 Replies
 
 

Related Topics

Obama '08? - Discussion by sozobe
Let's get rid of the Electoral College - Discussion by Robert Gentel
McCain's VP: - Discussion by Cycloptichorn
The 2008 Democrat Convention - Discussion by Lash
McCain is blowing his election chances. - Discussion by McGentrix
Snowdon is a dummy - Discussion by cicerone imposter
Food Stamp Turkeys - Discussion by H2O MAN
TEA PARTY TO AMERICA: NOW WHAT?! - Discussion by farmerman
 
  1. Forums
  2. » Kerry gets served up with 'waffles'
Copyright © 2026 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.03 seconds on 03/04/2026 at 12:37:17