Correlating Education Course(s) to Value

Reply Mon 11 Nov, 2013 11:14 pm
I'm working on a hypothetical (Hypothetical = Fictional) problem, which could have practical applications I'll assume, but I'm not sure how to set it up, in order to apply a statistical test.

Let's assume a six-course curriculum is offered, that an organization's employees may voluntarily undertake after hours (tuition, books and all fees are fully reimbursed). The curriculum content is all related, although there are no prerequisites or predetermined order for taking the courses, and employees may take as many or as few courses as they wish. All the employees who are eligible to take the courses, are assumed to be initially of almost equivalent background and experience.

The organization has developed a "recognition index" which can be calculated for each employee who takes any of the courses, and there appears to be a clear, positive correlation of taking courses to the level of the calculated recognition index.

Now the organization would like to know whether taking any one of the courses or multiple combinations of courses (vs. the entire six-course curriculum), can be identified as providing the optimal value for the employee (and the organization).

Below is a hypothetical ten-person sample of employees who each took at least one course, along with their overall "recognition index" value.


This is the point where I'm more than a little hazy on how to set-up the next statistical test, and see whether one course (or some multiple combination of courses), can be statistically correlated to a recognition index value. I probably just need a small "nudge" in the right direction, as I do have some understanding of the application of statistics - or maybe I've just tricked myself into believing I do . . .
  • Topic Stats
  • Top Replies
  • Link to this Topic
Type: Question • Score: 0 • Views: 3,461 • Replies: 5
No top replies

Reply Tue 12 Nov, 2013 12:55 am
I would work on getting an average recognition index per course, together with an "inverse" course take-up score.
The problem is that particular course take-up could be a function of number of courses taken since those perceived as harder may not be taken up.
Reply Tue 12 Nov, 2013 07:01 am
Okay, good idea. In this fictional scenario, the recognition index is only attributable to the employee overall. There's no explicit/implicit linkage of any single course (or courses) to the recognition index - so that's why I think this problem will lend itself to an inference solution, based on the pattern of the data (courses taken correlated to the recognition index).
0 Replies
Reply Tue 12 Nov, 2013 07:12 am
At first blush (quick reading) it looks like it may be a linear or logistic regression problem (relationship between the number of courses and the recognition index). Then, try a factor analysis with each course as a factor to find key courses that influence the overall recognition index.
Reply Tue 12 Nov, 2013 05:28 pm
Okay, a friend here at work also suggested that a "cluster analysis" (which is the equivalent of the factor analysis) might be one statistical technique to use, since it's a non-parametric test.

I had speculated that the other solution might be a multiple regression (linear) solution, similar to what JPB has suggested. Does that sound about right?

I'll concede that I'm in uncharted territory with both the factor analysis and the multiple regression (I can mastermind the regression of one variable . . .), and any help on setting up the problem equation for either of those would be a big help. Thanks!
Reply Sun 26 Jan, 2014 11:24 am
I was looking back at some past postings and I saw this, so I thought I would try and "close the loop" - maybe for the benefit of others down the road, who encounter a similar situation, especially since some of this feedback did help me get going in the right direction. although I did have to reach out to some of our staff PhDs for a little more help (although I can't understand but about half of what they say, most of the time . . .).

So, a multiple regression strategy turned out to be the approach to use, to bring this effort to ground. First, I used multiple regression to ascertain whether there was simply any optimal number of courses that contributed (or failed to contribute) to increases in the Recognition Index.
That proved not to be the case, as any additional course taken appeared to be positively correlated with a higher Recognition Index value.

Next, using multiple regression again, I looked at whether any specific courses taken could predict a higher Recognition Index. Luckily, in my fictional example, it was assumed that the courses listed were not taken in any predetermined order, and without any requirements for any prior course prerequisites.
This showed which independent variables (Course #s) were the least significant (relative to the level of significance selected), and which did not substantially predict increases in the Recognition Index.

This gave at least an empirical evidence and basis for which courses the organizations (and the employees) would optimally benefit from, especially if budgets "got tight", at some point in the future.

Since all of these analyses, seemingly beget another round of analysis, if the information were available, the next logical examination would likely include an analysis of the specific order in which the courses were taken. And in the spirit of full disclosure (in case someone is so motivated as to start "checking" my answers here on a slow Sunday [or ever in the future]), my fictional case study actually contained 50 "cases", but I only populated 10 cases for this posting, mostly to provide some "data direction" and help the collective audience understand where this might need to go.

This was a good posting, and a fun (okay, reasonably fun) task. Thanks for the help.
0 Replies

Related Topics

  1. Forums
  2. » Correlating Education Course(s) to Value
Copyright © 2020 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.03 seconds on 12/02/2020 at 12:22:03