1
   

BUSH'S HOSTAGE CRISIS: SHADES OF CARTER'S HOSTAGE CRISIS?

 
 
Titus
 
Reply Sun 11 Apr, 2004 05:00 pm
Tonight I learned that China can add their name to the growing list of nations (the USA, Japan, Italy, and Korea) with citizens being held against their will and threatened with death in Iraq.

It's become quite evident that the situation in Iraq -- a year after Saddam's monument was symbolically pulled off its pedestal, is completely out of control and civil war now looms.

That said, I wonder if during this election year, if the hostage crisis in Iraq will become for Bush what the hostage crisis in Iran became for former President Carter -- an politically poisoned albatross?
  • Topic Stats
  • Top Replies
  • Link to this Topic
Type: Discussion • Score: 1 • Views: 607 • Replies: 4
No top replies

 
Charli
 
  1  
Reply Sun 11 Apr, 2004 09:43 pm
Reasons for Hostage-Taking
The reasons for hostage-taking in Iraq now and in Iran in 1979 (?) are not the same. The U.S. is presently occupying Iraq after "overthrowing" their government. In Iran it was a bit different:

[quote]* November 4: Iranian militants attack the US embassy and take over 90 American and Western hostages. 52 remain in captivity for 444 days. The hostages are held in an attempt to force the US to turn over the escaped Shah and his assets to Iran, and to apologize for "crimes against the Iranian people." President Carter refuses to comply, and tries various economic and diplomatic methods to achieve their release. Carter's popularity drops every day that "America is held hostage;" the American media keeps relentless count of every day the hostages are in captivity. (Decades History Timeline)

http://www.geocities.com/purplesage23/1971.html
[/quote]

The "damage" to Bush's political career can depend on other developments: bin Laden's capture? An "excellent" truce? A "good" Iraq government in place after June 30? Or . . . ??? [/b]
0 Replies
 
Titus
 
  1  
Reply Sun 11 Apr, 2004 10:16 pm
"Or . . . ???"

Or, more violence in Iraq and US troop death, civil war, and/or hostage taking and the perception that Bush is clueless about how to wean the US out of his guerilla war.
0 Replies
 
Charli
 
  1  
Reply Mon 12 Apr, 2004 07:14 am
Yes . . .

Yes, . . .

[quote]"Or . . . ???"

Or, more violence in Iraq and US troop death, civil war, and/or hostage taking and the perception that Bush is clueless about how to wean the US out of his guerilla war.[/quote]

. . . Bush's "politically poisoned albatross."
0 Replies
 
Titus
 
  1  
Reply Mon 12 Apr, 2004 07:43 am
Americans are not keen on hostage taking, and Bush, I hope and pray, will ultimately be held responsible by the voters for the guerilla war in Iraq.

Imagine, for the first time in his life, George "aWol" Bush will be held accountable for his actions.
0 Replies
 
 

Related Topics

Obama '08? - Discussion by sozobe
Let's get rid of the Electoral College - Discussion by Robert Gentel
McCain's VP: - Discussion by Cycloptichorn
Food Stamp Turkeys - Discussion by H2O MAN
The 2008 Democrat Convention - Discussion by Lash
McCain is blowing his election chances. - Discussion by McGentrix
Snowdon is a dummy - Discussion by cicerone imposter
TEA PARTY TO AMERICA: NOW WHAT?! - Discussion by farmerman
 
  1. Forums
  2. » BUSH'S HOSTAGE CRISIS: SHADES OF CARTER'S HOSTAGE CRISIS?
Copyright © 2024 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.03 seconds on 05/20/2024 at 02:08:00