32
   

Intelligent Design vs. Casino Universe

 
 
JimmyJ
 
  1  
Reply Thu 27 Feb, 2014 02:46 am
@spendius,
So you don't support euthanasia?

and you say eugenics as if it's a completely bad thing. There is no black and white here. The medical benefits of using eugenics are apparent.

As with any technology, it will always be used for both bad and good.
spendius
 
  1  
Reply Thu 27 Feb, 2014 05:04 am
@JimmyJ,
I never said that eugenics was a bad thing James. Nor euthanasia.

I'm trying to get fm, and others, to be up front about where they are leading their fans with pseudo-scientific mumbo-jumbo and their need to rant.

He, and them, have been saying the same things about religion for as long as I have been on A2K with never a glance at the consequences despite being asked many times to look them in the face.

fm said that he can't abide the mediocre and they are the bulk of his supporters. Anybody who blindly stumbles along following his chrons and his alleles and his tectonic shiftings whilst not knowing where they are leading is obviously mediocre.

He talks, as do others, as if human behaviour does not exist.

All they want actually is to not have their sexual activities frowned upon and are using science to acheive it. They don't do science. They peer-review what they have agreed to peer-review and hide away from the rest like the wimps they are.

Truth is not on their agenda.
farmerman
 
  1  
Reply Thu 27 Feb, 2014 09:32 am
@spendius,
Then you really are a mindless idiot.Weve had this discussion on other threads and a "thread specific" on eugenics (remember spendi?). In these threads and diversions Ive given an opinion several times. I realize that spendi is merely using this as a device to keep the focus on his meaningless existence. I just feel no need to accommodate his sad little need for constant attention .
Ill leave that to others.

spendius
 
  1  
Reply Thu 27 Feb, 2014 10:59 am
@farmerman,
I don't remember any discussion about eugenics fm. I have avoided the subject in the past. Will you link me to the discussion you claim I took part in on the matter.

So remind me of what your opinions were or still are and do try to forget all about any particular problem you say is specific to me regarding a need for constant attention that relates to no one else. Is it a gambit you are habituated to whenever you get a bit uncomfortable with the direction of a conversation. It is infantile.

Most scientists sacrifice their time to research for no other reason than to catch the attention of others with some novelty or ground-breaking discovery and are exceedingly jealous to protect their position.

Your constant harping on about it is embarrassing to yourself and to A2K. It is as if I am the only one it applies to in order to facilitate your use of it in an insulting way. I come on here to contribute to discussions just as everybody else does.

You know nothing of science fm. Your posts betray that fact. You are so biased, subjective and prejudiced that no scientist could remain within earshot of you for longer than it takes him to find you out.
farmerman
 
  1  
Reply Thu 27 Feb, 2014 11:37 am
@spendius,
just because I work in it all week doesn't mean Im not without my own opinions and prejudices.
Man you are certainly naïve. Ill bet you think that priests should renounce thei citizenships>
spendius
 
  1  
Reply Thu 27 Feb, 2014 11:42 am
@farmerman,
No scientist would hear someone pronounce the Bible "bullshit" and retain the slightest interest in the person.

Catholic priests have renounced their citizenship. It is a necessity. The word "Catholic" means nothing otherwise. Spirituality has no borders.
farmerman
 
  1  
Reply Thu 27 Feb, 2014 02:05 pm
@spendius,
Quote:
Catholic priests have renounced their citizenship. It is a necessity.
Maybe in the third world. In the US we have priests , ministers, and rabbis run for office.
"Just because Ive answered the call doesn't mean I renounce my citizenship"
Cardinal John Ohara

I believe youll find that the present pope as well as Woytila were quite active in their respective country's politics
"
spendius
 
  1  
Reply Thu 27 Feb, 2014 02:17 pm
@farmerman,
Why would he say that if there was not some expectations in that regard? He must have thought there were to feel like denying it.

Perhaps it explains why no US cardinals were appointed last week. It is not an office related to national politics. "My Kingdom is not of this world".

It is why Catholics were persecuted by the Crown.

Being "active in politics" is a nebulous concept. And if it does happen in the way you suggest it would not be announced.
0 Replies
 
JimmyJ
 
  1  
Reply Sat 1 Mar, 2014 12:34 am
@spendius,
That is one of the most ridiculous things I've ever heard.

So you are basically smarter than the entire scientific community and there is a gigantic conspiracy to hide the truth of intelligent design, flat-earth, young earth, and geocentricism from the world?

LOL.
spendius
 
  1  
Reply Sat 1 Mar, 2014 07:20 am
@JimmyJ,
You can declare anything as ridiculous as suits your purposes James. It doesn't make anything ridiculous and to think it does is objectively ridiculous.

The "entire scientific community" would have nothing to do with those who falsely claim on here to be representing it. It must be appalled and mortified at how it is being represented here by you lot.

Just as a libertine would be to see libertinage represented by somebody who thought it consisted of an illicit fling with a lady in the office in the broom cupboard.

No scientist would answer my post in that manner. And you can LOLL all over the floor with arse detached for as long as you want.
JimmyJ
 
  1  
Reply Sat 1 Mar, 2014 11:44 am
@spendius,
So, just to reroute you back to what I just said since you like to change topics and dance around what people post (not fooling anyone btw), you think there's a conspiracy in the scientific community to cover up young earth, flat earth, geocentric earth, and dinosaur/man at the same time earth?
edgarblythe
 
  1  
Reply Sat 1 Mar, 2014 12:48 pm
@JimmyJ,
Spendius is having fun with you. He doesn't really believe that crap, most of it.
0 Replies
 
spendius
 
  1  
Reply Sat 1 Mar, 2014 02:53 pm
@JimmyJ,
Quote:
you think there's a conspiracy in the scientific community to cover up young earth, flat earth, geocentric earth, and dinosaur/man at the same time earth?


No I don't. The conspiracy is not in the scientific community. It is commercial. It uses those things you mention to discredit the Christian religion and its rules on sexual behaviour because it hasn't the nerve to try to discredit the rules themselves. In the main it lives by those rules itself.

And you do look eager to fall for the soft trick I must say. Can you not justify pre-marital sex and a spot of adultery without recourse to young earth, flat earth, geocentric earth, and dinosaur/man at the same time earth? Sheesh!!! You should read some better literature.

Full blown eugenics, euthanasia and conditioning to scientific materialism can be justified without reference to that pile of cobwebbed chestnuts. You are quaintly reticent on such matters.

The conspiracy seems to me to have lost a lot of steam in the last year or two.
JimmyJ
 
  1  
Reply Sat 1 Mar, 2014 04:11 pm
@spendius,
But you do think there is a conspiracy, don't you?

Why don't you just come out and say that you're a YEC?
spendius
 
  1  
Reply Sat 1 Mar, 2014 06:00 pm
@JimmyJ,
I do think there's a conspiracy--yes. Media based mainly. Megalopolitan. Decadent.

Quote:
Why don't you just come out and say that you're a YEC?


Even fm wouldn't stoop to that level.
farmerman
 
  1  
Reply Sat 1 Mar, 2014 06:40 pm
@spendius,
no, because fm knows that spendi has a severe case of " admiring his own reflection in the pool" syndrome, and its never worth time engaging someone whose main reference is a mirror
JimmyJ
 
  1  
Reply Sat 1 Mar, 2014 07:38 pm
@spendius,
So the conspiracy is what, exactly?

Are scientists hiding evidence that the Earth is actually 6000 years old? LOL

You're good entertainment, spendius.
spendius
 
  1  
Reply Sun 2 Mar, 2014 05:14 am
@JimmyJ,
Quote:
So the conspiracy is what, exactly?


To secularise the world. Like in North Korea.

Quote:
You're good entertainment, spendius.


The most successful angler is the one who enjoys it most.

Do you really care how old the earth is?
spendius
 
  1  
Reply Sun 2 Mar, 2014 06:04 am
@farmerman,
Simply because you have been set going by the application of various carrots and sticks to drill holes in the earth and find things useful for our self-indulgences does not mean that you are especially enlightened fm. It means you are a handy little tool.

There are many thousands of men drilling holes in the earth and they can't all be especially enlightened. That you think you are unique in this respect is your mirror.

Nobody on A2K does as much bragging as you do. It's incessant.

From the amount of time you have engaged yourself on my posts you disprove the very silly point you are trying to make.

Where is the link to your position on eugenics which you claimed you had posted? Let's have it again for those who missed it and for new members? I'm all for flat out, full blown eugenics. There would be no random fecundations if I was in charge. They would be organised on strict scientific lines.

I'm a real atheist you see. Not a wobbly, whooshie, soft centred panderer to the sexually promiscuous and depraved like you are. I just don't care for too much revolutionary change of direction carried through by the half-hearted, half-baked wimps like you who are merely jacking off their over-blown egos in their nondescript computer rooms.

Allay my suspicion that you made up that **** about having set out your position on the scientific control of human reproduction knowing full well that nobody is going to look for it.

farmerman
 
  1  
Reply Sun 2 Mar, 2014 07:37 am
@spendius,
I wonder what has happened to Herald? this thread was begun under his Christian aegis. It has, nonetheless , degraded into the name calling and pettiness of most all of the threads in A2K.



 

Related Topics

Intelligent Design - Question by giujohn
What is Intelligent Design? - Discussion by RexRed
Do *ANY* creationists understand evolution? - Discussion by rosborne979
The Bed Bug/Parasite Plant Theory - Question by TeePee38
dna worlds - Discussion by Syamsu
DD VERSUS EVOLUTION - Discussion by Setanta
The Evil of god - Discussion by giujohn
 
Copyright © 2025 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.07 seconds on 03/17/2025 at 12:16:21