Intelligent Design vs. Casino Universe

/facepalm

You really can not be that stupid.

But the peer-reviewers are all pissing in the same pot James.

Have you seen Alan Alda's Flame challenge? Cash prizes.

I hope fm doesn't have a go.

The peer-reviewers are all established scientists who actually do research in their respective fields.

And they are all pissing in the same pot.

You're starry-eyed James. I worked in the most advanced scientific establishments for many years. I knew maybe a couple of hundred scientists. One intimately. They are just like everybody else except that they have a distinct tendency to be pompous, certain and naive.

I was out of it by 30 and it was a safe, secure and well paid occupation with social status. And there was no small amount of nepotism which is anti-scientific.

They studied Which magazine before buying things.

Keep your nose to the grindstone and you'll eventually get your reserved car parking space and key to the cleanest washroom.

The Pope appointed 19 Cardinals yesterday and not one American. I expect you're pleased about that fact.

We are not looking - we are.
Take for example the teeth. Setting aside that you neither know where the genetic information for the formation of the teeth actually is, nor how it works, why don't you tell us what we are doing with the teeth.
The dentists charge them with mercury at first (to prepare you for the mercury detoxification program in the late 50s), on the next filling put some arsenic to remove the nerve and the blood vessels (instead of preserving them by using some substrate) after that put some photopolymeric filling, which is usually stronger that the dead tissue (dentin) and the tooth breaks after a while ... and hardly after the tooth is gone they start thinking about bone grafting and guided tissue regeneration - in order to have some beautiful bone for the titanium implant pin.
Wouldn't it be much better to recover the dentin and the enamel in the first place ... and to restore the tooth to its former glory from the very beginning ... rather than doing all that conventional equilibristics.
In comparison to things like this the (lack of) calibration of the rocks is your least problem.

I don't believe for a second that you're in any way affiliated with any scientists whatsoever.

You are literally too stupid to make fun of.

btw James--A facepalm is given to Mme. Verdurin to perform in Swann In Love.

Make sure there are no Proustians around when you do it yourself because they might need to visit a Smirkopodist to get back their usual countenance.

... and you are figuratively not entirely smart ... to handle properly with a computer on a discussion on the net.

The oldest rock on Earth recently identified:
http://www.cnn.com/2014/02/24/world/oldest-earth-fragment/index.html?hpt=hp_t2

Not again surely?

More like I can safely assess (on the basis of your intentional ignorance) that you aren't mentally capable of having a conversation about anything related to science.

... and you are at least at 30 000 lys away from the nearest scientific talk.
Triple facepalm, StarTrack.

I hope that Australian Shield segment can retain some identity when Australia smashes into the Sundas and Indonesia in about another 10 million years

It will be before you answer the question about eugenics fm.

You can torture me with your tiresome run-ons and pointless phrases and Ill NEVER yield to answer whatever question you feel is so important to even address me.
Not getting enough attention today are we ?


Being a bridge dweller as you are, has its drawbacks.

I'm not trying to torture you fm. Your position on such things as eugenics is important for those who are following your lead. They have a right to know where you are taking them.

It is neither here nor there where I live.

There is a Horizon programme concerning the disconnect between logic and intuition in how we make decisions. An American psychologist seems to be the main man. I have not seen it so I can't comment.

SPACE--The Final Frontier.



See above

That's funny coming from someone who thinks the Earth is 6000 years old.

That's clear enough. Besides full blown eugenics I assume you also support euthanasia and conditioning for scientific materialism.

It's logical to me. We have them anyway in discreet forms.