Intelligent Design vs. Casino Universe

You are a brazen, stochastic pseudo-scientist to infinity. You contradict yourself stochastically to infinity and then criticize people whose claims are supported by evidence and genuinely valid inferences stochastically to infinity. When you stochastically have something better, come back and show us to infinity and then you won't be exposed as such a stochastically to infinity wingnut.

     From time to time just like you - so what in particular is the problem. Why don't you tell something about your pseudo-scientific integrity, for example, how many of the Gaps (the question of which has been raised by you personally) have you specified and explained so far in this thread, and instead of that how many times have you changed the main theme to red herrings, straw-men of any kind, and broken records of aliens? ... and why have you poisoned the keywords of the thread: the stochastic or non-deterministing nature of the Universe does not assume aliens, and the existence of Intelligence in the Universe that has always existed does not suppose aliens-of-the-gaps.
     There is more. You don't even have a definition of God - so what you are trying to convince us all that God does not exist. You claim that you have attended some math classes, and if this is true (for which I doubt) you should have known that the negation of the universal quantifier is unprovable, and the verification & validation of the assumptions of the Big Bang 'theory' is unknowable ... and that the very 'theory' is inconsistent from any point of view.

I've explained your god-of-the-gaps errors several times already, but like other statement of facts, you conveniently "forget" about them and stochastically demand that I/we repeat things we've already told you to infinity.

I'm not trying to convince you or anybody else that your god doesn't exist. That's a straw man. What I'm showing is that your claims for it fall apart under scrutiny, and therefore a healthy dose of skepticism is more appropriate than blind belief. I'm trying to get some legitimate evidence for that god from you. So far, nobody has produced any. Therefore, there is no logical reason for a rational person to claim or believe that there is one, whether it's a garden variety god or a 45%/30%/25% this, that or the other alien/ILF/god-thingy.

Nor am I trying to convince any body that the Big Bang theory is true. I'm merely demonstrating how logically flawed your criticisms are and asking you to step up your game if you expect to be taken as anything other than a Random Internet Wingnut.

     I was not asking that - I was asking you to specify the Gaps themselves, only the gaps, and nothing else ... and not 'more than once' (in the form of fake and irrelevant references), but only once, in a list, all of it with your own personal words ... and without 'you' if possible. Wretch.

I've already done that as well as explain your argumentum ad ignorantiam fallacies. I'm not going to keep repeating myself in order to indulge your red herring and hand waving strategies. I've pointed out dozens of fallacies in practically everything of (attempted) substance that you've posted. You always respond with and later demand that I repeat myself. Nope. Read the thread and start paying attention. Engage whatever memory capacity you have. Make notes on a notebook, if you have to. But I will not be your personal tape recorder.

     Where. Would you name the post in which you have specified the Gaps in a list. To talk something, whatever, does not mean to talk on the theme and to answer the questions.

No. I'm not thread-mining for your amusement. You started the thread, tend to it. Put on your thinking cap for a change. Read and remember for a change. Turn off your knee-jerk denialism for a change. You're paying for all the times you responded with Hell, I'm trying to think of an informal fallacy you HAVEN'T committed at least 10 times.

     You cannot participate in a theme by cherry-picking the questions - to be fond of some hypothetical beliefs and to avoid the inconvenient questions, like for example where is your post with the listing of the Gaps that you 'have told me many time'. The fact that you reading on idle mode some broken record for over 200 pages does not mean that you have ever had any listing with any Gaps. Where have you listed the Gaps ... and why is it so difficult for make a list of several obvious misconceptions?

Blah blah blah Ginger blah blah blah. Read the thread. Your answers are there. If you spent 1/100th the energy that you spend on denial and spent it on learning instead, you'd have that Nobel by now.

     It doesn't matter what my answers are. What that actually matters is what your answers are: can you list that Gaps, or not?

Reading comprehension fail. My elaborations of your logical fallacies = "your answers." Read the thread. I'm not your slave.

     No, no, list here, on the next post, indexed by 1. ..., 2. ... , ... N .... all the Gaps (that I am 'basing my logical fallacies on'). I don't see any list so far?

Are you reversing your earlier claim that you disown the alien/ILF/god-thingy claim? You're going back to defending it?

     It doesn't matter. When will you remove your fake 'keywords' from the title of this thread. You are simply misusing with the option of the forum to discus comprehensively various themes.

It is precisely what matters if you want to get back to discussing your numerous, repetitive and persistent fallacies regarding the alien/ILF/god-thingy. Are you very sure you want to go back there?

     As far as I can see you are already skipping 'the Gaps', but this does not release you from the obligation to write down the listing with all the Gaps ... and to give a formal definition of that 'thingy'.

Your god-of-the-gaps fallacy is but one of a long list of fallacies that you keep repeating over and over and over and over again, even after having been instructed numerous times. I'm not going to repeat myself endlessy in order to feed your strategy of dishonest evasion. Do you want to go back to owning the alien/ILF/god-of-the-gaps-thingy? Because I still haven't seen any evidence to support it, only stubborn, mindless repetition of logical fallacies in a futile attempt to evade the fail. So if we're back to arguing about the 45%/30%/25% (that you subsequently self-contratict and refute) invisible, magical, evidence-free, earth-instruction-teleporting alien/ILF/god-thingy from billions of years ago, let's get down to business: Where's your evidence?

     ... and where is your list with the complete and exhaustive specification of the Gaps?

Are you back to defending your teleporting alien/ILF/god-thingy-of-the-gaps hypothesis? If not, it's a moot point. If so, let's cut straight to the chase: Where's your evidence?

     'My evidence' for filling the Gaps ... and where is your evidence of the Gaps themselves? Where is your enumeration of the Gaps in a list? Where is that listing?
      BTW, this thread is neither about aliens and gaps, nor about any aliens-of-the-gaps, nor about the personal problems with the aliens of whomsoever, so if you have something to say on the theme - you are welcome. If you are going to exercise your villager obstinacy - you will not be told anything.