@FBM,
FBM wrote:Learn English if you're going to attempt to communicate in it.
... and why don't you learn math logic before start presenting yourself on the net as a top scientist of seventh star magnitude.
FBM wrote:The Standard Model describes space-time as a continuum.
... and the greatest problem of some people, who are reading, referencing & using things they don't understand, but accept rather as a truth of the last resort, is that they don't know what they are doing.
FBM wrote:Metaphors, idioms, slang, analogies, etc, are used in every language.
... really. Why don't you write some scientific article full of 'metaphors, idioms, slang, analogies' and submit it to some scientific magazine to see when & how they will publish it.
FBM wrote: Seriously. Think about what you just said.
This concept of 'suddenly' is taken out of your (let's not say out of where for now) ... and has no relation to the explanation of the Big Bang 'theory', for it is obvious that no Big Bang has ever existed ... let alone creating whatsoever. The University has most probably always (or at least back in time to where we can reach) existed - where do you see the problem of
suddenly and
non-suddenly here. If the Big Bang can operate at such huge scale, so suddenly, and can appear out of nowhere and can create when it finds appropriate a whole Universe without any causality this imposes infinite risk to our own existence at present. Any moment any Singularity, having temperature of 1.47.10^42 deg.K may appear out of nowhere in your laptop and create there a brand new Universe that will start expanding into you personal ignorance, which is infinite Hyperspace with infinite number of dimensions.
You are so busy with the references that you cannot understand simple things - the Universe cannot expand just so & into Nothing; nothing can exist without a Time component; you cannot construct differential equations over variable that is defined on the one side of the equation and undefined (non-existing) on the other side; you cannot come without any causality out of nowhere, no matter whether in the form of a metaphor or not.
FBM wrote:Pay attention, please. This has been explained to you before in this very thread.
State it personally - without any references: How much is the Energy-Matter components of the Assumptions: [No Matter; No Energy; No Empty Space; No Time], and how much are the values of those components in the present day Universe - would you write down the equation of the Matter of the Universe (MU) = Known Matter (KM) + Dark Matter (DM); MU = KM + DM = KM + 25/4.KM = 29/4 KM
- how much is the present day energy of the Universe (EU) = KE + DE = KE + 70/4.KE = 74/4 KE
- and how exactly the Big Bang has guessed to launch the time ... by using a metaphor? Another thing that you don't want to understand is that nobody can be bullshitted to infinity.
FBM wrote: Scientology! I knew it!
I am not claiming that this is the case, but actually this is validly plausible hypothesis, and if you are curious to know, it is much more plausible that the provoking only laughter ridiculous explanations of launching the Time (introducing existence & causality & sequence of the events) & Temperature (taken out of the sleeve energy of the Universe and stored into a point with dimensions of 9.10^-33 cu.m and temperature of 1.47.10^42 deg.K) components by means of a ... metaphor. You should have started writing comics.