Intelligent Design vs. Casino Universe

@FBM,

We already know they can't answer that one question, and their only defense is to side-track the question by asking more questions about evolution.

An average high school debate student would be able to make them look for fool they are by continuing to ask them only one question that they can't answer. In a debate, it's one question and one answer, not two dozen questions and no answer.

1 Reply

@cicerone imposter,

I can imagine them taking somebody to court and then having the judge demand evidence. "Case dismissed!" Heehee...

0 Replies

@FBM,

FBM wrote:

There's a mountain more evidence in one sentence of what they publish than in everything you've written so far. Got any evidence for your god yet? Anything? Any tiny scrap?

     Just a second with all that marathon with the elementary particles. You use these as 'evidence for non-existence' (of God in this case), claiming that notwithstanding that you have found 17 particles so far (about more of the half of which you don't even know too much, except for that they are released at super-high speed in heavy water or s.th.), neither you have found traces of any God, nor you have seen Him on the radio telescope, notwithstanding that you search by that telescope the whole space at all detectable frequencies.
     The 'evidence' is that you still cannot see any God on the event horizon, right? How did you come to know that you will be able to recognize God if you see Him ... on the radio telescope, where 99,9% of the data are not even with any plausible interpretation, of any kind? ... and how did you come to know that God is a radio-station at some frequency? ... and why do you think that you know everything about frequencies, when you cannot even explain how and why a photon or electron can behave sometimes as wave and sometimes as particle ... not to mention that sometimes each of them might be here and on the other side of the Universe at one and the same time?
     ... and how did you come to know that you can prove the non-existence of the universal - the non-existence of the omnipresence, omnipotence and omniscience ... and at the same time to claim that it is the Big Bang & its top designers who are the real omnipresent, omnipotent and omniscient explanation of the world? You cannot deny something and in the same time use it ... for personal gain, for example.

1 Reply

@Herald,

Rhetorical questions Not Equal

evidence for your god. Scientists have an abundance of evidence to support their theory and are getting more every day. None of it requires a supernatural being, so present some competing evidence and let's see how they compare. Any real evidence that you can come up with. Any. Let's see it.

3 Replies

http://i206.photobucket.com/albums/bb192/DinahFyre/1609756_10152821369296840_6024304740259471065_n.jpg

0 Replies

@FBM,

Quote:

Scientists have an abundance of evidence to support their theory and are getting more every day.

Really?

Why don't you bring them on????

1 Reply

@Quehoniaomath,

hes like a car wreck isn't he?, you cant just look away.
Im becoming convinced that hes unable to even feed himself

1 Reply

@farmerman,

Quote:

hes like a car wreck isn't he?, you cant just look away.
Im becoming convinced that hes unable to even feed himself

lol

Still trying to use some stupid Ad Hominems. again?!

btw why do you still believe in the religion called evolution?

your paycheck??? LOL

1 Reply

@Quehoniaomath,

when is truth an ad hominem?

1 Reply

@farmerman,

farmerman wrote:

when is truth an ad hominem?

... when the ad hominem is presented as truth of the last resort and 'evidence'

1 Reply

@FBM,

FBM wrote:

Scientists have an abundance of evidence to support their theory and are getting more every day.

Are you joking: 'abundance of evidence' - what is that supposed to mean? The very fact that the scientists can find an 'abundance of evidence' to continue bullshitting you cannot be a justification of any kind, whatsoever.

FBM wrote:

None of it requires a supernatural being, so present some competing evidence and let's see how they compare.

Obviously you don't understand anything of what you are trying to talk about, do you?

FBM wrote:

Any real evidence that you can come up with. Any. Let's see it.

You don't know ... and you will never be able to get knowing whether the world has been 'created' or made as a result of imposing constraints on it - is that enough to you?

2 Replies

@Herald,

Having difficulty with definitions?

Quote:

a·bun·dance
əˈbəndəns/Submit
noun
a very large quantity of something.
"the tropical island boasts an abundance of wildlife"
the quantity or amount of something, e.g., a chemical element or an animal or plant species, present in a particular area, volume, sample, etc.
"estimates of abundance of harp seals"

Here's your 'abundance.'
http://www.proof-of-evolution.com/evolution-evidence.htmlhttp://www.proof-of-evolution.com/evolution-evidence.html

Any answer to our ONE QUESTION? Prove your god exists.
It's a very simple question; no nuances, no tricks, no strawman, no sidetracks, no diversions, and no shyt.

1 Reply

@cicerone imposter,

LOL

Quote:

No Such URL at This Domain

0 Replies

Oh ok now I have that site, and what do we see there???????

Quote:

Evolution: Designed by Jesus Christ!

Bit stupid isn't it!??

That idiot jesus ******* christ lived 2000 years agon and evolution is longer , me thinks!!!!

so how can Jesus.... Ahhh never mind .

1 Reply

@Herald,

Herald wrote:

FBM wrote:
Scientists have an abundance of evidence to support their theory and are getting more every day.
     Are you joking: 'abundance of evidence' - what is that supposed to mean? The very fact that the scientists can find an 'abundance of evidence' to continue bullshitting you cannot be a justification of any kind, whatsoever.

FBM wrote:
None of it requires a supernatural being, so present some competing evidence and let's see how they compare.
     Obviously you don't understand anything of what you are trying to talk about, do you?

FBM wrote:
Any real evidence that you can come up with. Any. Let's see it.

     You don't know ... and you will never be able to get knowing whether the world has been 'created' or made as a result of imposing constraints on it - is that enough to you?

Well, nothing is just a tad short of "anything." You've yet again failed to produce anything substantial; just more empty rhetoric.

http://i1330.photobucket.com/albums/w561/hapkido1996/37_zps3ae50676.gif

2 Replies

@Quehoniaomath,

Quote:

That idiot jesus ******* christ lived 2000 years ago

Ah... You don't doubt the historicity of Jesus? Strange.

0 Replies

@FBM,

That's not even 'rhetoric.' It's called 'religious bull shyt.' No substance, no evidence, no facts, no common sense.

1 Reply

@cicerone imposter,

I found their script:

http://i206.photobucket.com/albums/bb192/DinahFyre/1505428_10152838546171605_995823954415118355_n.png

0 Replies

@FBM,

FBM wrote:

None of it requires a supernatural being

Are you sure about that? What about the self-contradictions - how are they interpreted in the real world? What about the contradictions with the laws of physics and math logic - how would the Big Bang overcome all those contradictions, if it has not been assigned 'divine' status to be above the things ... by default?

FBM wrote:

Any real evidence that you can come up with. Any. Let's see it.

I presented two evidences and you conveniently skipped them. You may go back in the thread and find them, if you are really interested.
May I also ask you a question: why are you asking about that evidence so persistently like a broken record, and why are you not asking any questions about the existence of the Hyperspace, for example ... or about the 'bottom line' of the Black Holes? Why are you cherry picking the questions ... if you are looking for the truth about the world, and not for some convenient explanations that will suit you and that are not dangerous to the system above of all, you would ask neutral questions - not tendentious ones.

1 Reply

@FBM,

Quote:

Quote:
FBM wrote:
Any real evidence that you can come up with. Any. Let's see it.
You don't know ... and you will never be able to get knowing whether the world has been 'created' or made as a result of imposing constraints on it - is that enough to you?

Well, nothing is just a tad short of "anything." You've yet again failed to produce anything substantial; just more empty rhetoric.

Why don't you simply answer to the question: How did you come to know that the world has been created (by whatever/whoever) and not constrained for example from something bigger ... that has always existed?
'Science has evidence' is not accepted as an answer in the capacity of being too general and too casual as a statement, and hence very difficult to be viewed as any serious answer.

0 Replies

Intelligent Design vs. Casino Universe

Related Topics

Quick Links

My Account

able2know