32
   

Intelligent Design vs. Casino Universe

 
 
Quehoniaomath
 
  0  
Reply Wed 8 Oct, 2014 01:19 pm
@farmerman,
Quote:
Quahog is posting Behes book as if he read it. ll the while Behe's own opinions are based upon a "Theistic evolution" base. Quahog must disappear up his asshole each evening .
Herals has no idea of what hes even talking about


LOL
I know that is a vey deep wish of yours! Wink
Btw how come YOU have no clue about what you are talking about?
please explain.
0 Replies
 
Quehoniaomath
 
  0  
Reply Wed 8 Oct, 2014 01:37 pm
One thing about fm is extremely clear!

He doesn't even DARE to doubt the evolution ****,
Most sensible i ntelligent and logical people piss and **** on it!

it is worth nil, zero, zilch.


But eh?! It pays your checks, right???



man o man what a...
0 Replies
 
parados
 
  1  
Reply Wed 8 Oct, 2014 02:16 pm
@Herald,
Quote:
No, they have not. Nobody has succeeded so far to produce life out of amino-acids by a lightning.


And you have yet to produce an air conditioning unit in 10 years time. Neither have anything to do with evolution.
farmerman
 
  1  
Reply Wed 8 Oct, 2014 03:49 pm
@parados,
Quahog says he is areligious, yet he believes all the fraudulent crap from the creationist and ID press

He "buys what Behe says" but doesn't realize that Behe at least accepts the process of evolution

He says that "evolution science is dying" , yet he fails to present ANY representatives who are NOT spokespeople of religious affiliations (most all of them are Fundamental Christians)

He has NO training or education himself(its obvious because he only buys and reads "fringe science news"

Then, he expects people to rush out and accept what his worldviews are,

NO THANKS, Orthodox Moronism still describes his position best
Herald
 
  0  
Reply Wed 8 Oct, 2014 09:10 pm
@farmerman,
farmerman wrote:
I actually believe you are afraid of the truth and whatever would be discovered.
      ... and what is that truth of yours ... that we are so afraid of?
0 Replies
 
Herald
 
  0  
Reply Wed 8 Oct, 2014 09:17 pm
@farmerman,
farmerman wrote:
... that you are afraid to engage in spirited debate based upon facts and evidence.
     Why don't you stop about 'facts and evidence', for you don't have any facts and any evidences ... about the process of evolution. All you have are DNA sequences that don't match your theory, on the grounds whereof you are trying to misinterpret the facts in order to match your 'theory'. WFM.
farmerman wrote:
It opens and introduces the "limits of evolution"
     The limits of evolution are the Earth on one side (there is neither observed nor implicitly suggested biosphere outside the Earth); and the other limit is the extend to which you can misinterpret the facts and evidences.
Herald
 
  0  
Reply Wed 8 Oct, 2014 09:22 pm
@cicerone imposter,
cicerone imposter wrote:
They are afraid; their lifelong belief system would crumble before their eyes if they admit to understanding the facts presented to them about scientific facts about evolution.
     The very same could be said about you two as well. If you find neutrino travelling faster than light you don't know how to proceed further - all of your world will collapse like a house of cards. The very same is with the explanation of life. If you have to admit that the DNA sequences are not chemistry you have no clue how to proceed further. You both are not afraid of the shadow of the knife on the wall - you are afraid of the noise ... of the shadow.
0 Replies
 
Quehoniaomath
 
  0  
Reply Thu 9 Oct, 2014 12:02 am
@farmerman,
Quote:
Quahog says he is areligious, yet he believes all the fraudulent crap from the creationist and ID press


Wow boy! You are completely utterly wrong and don't even see it.
You are just editing what I write to defend an extremely non sensical religion called evolution. You can't be helped,
I don't believe all......
You are only trying to convince yourself that I am.


sad to see. You sound very desperate to me and others, atill trying to cling to a a-logical, extremely stupid, extemely flawed and retarded religion.

Why boy, why????

farmerman
 
  1  
Reply Thu 9 Oct, 2014 12:54 am
@Quehoniaomath,
you are delusional besides. If you don't understand that you've been posting ID and Creationist argument then you are dumber than I thought.
Quehoniaomath
 
  0  
Reply Thu 9 Oct, 2014 02:09 am
@farmerman,
I asked you why boy? why cling to an outdated stupid extreme religion that doesn't work.

Are you that blind??

The sheer fact that you don't even have a shred of doubt is conclusive for me that you are clinging to a religion. In ALL your postings you are DEFENDING your religion and not EXPLORING it. Why? You don't dare too.
Deep down you know it is extrmely wronmg, extremely stupid and retarded.
But you keep on lying to yourself. And repeat all the time your prayer: "Evolution is real, Evolution is real."

Maybe change it to

Now repeat after me:

evolution is one giant hoax, evolution is one giant hoax,
evolution is one giant hoax.

Oh and there is this one:

repeat after me:

"I, fm, lie for a living", I, fm, lie for a living, I, fm, lie for a living

See, feel better now?! Smile


farmerman
 
  2  
Reply Thu 9 Oct, 2014 04:48 am
@Quehoniaomath,
Quote:
why cling to an outdated stupid extreme religion that doesn't work.


AHH but it does work.AND according to all available and irrefutible evidence ,It works mahvelously. Nothing else can explain the diversity of life through earths history better than evolution (If you've something better, lets hear it, stop whining). I suppose that You just need to deny this fact,based upon some Fundamentalist religious tradition.
However, Im sure you are qualified to dispense hot beverages to your customers. Being a barista does require a modicum of training
Quehoniaomath
 
  0  
Reply Thu 9 Oct, 2014 05:15 am
@farmerman,
Quote:
irrefutible evidence



LOL



LOL


WHERE THE **** IS IT?


Nowhere!!!

Boy o boy oh boy there is NO IRREFUTIBLE EVIDENCE

UNLESS you believe in this stupid religion called evolution,
evolution fundamentalists like you see evidence everywhere, even there were there is none!

so, I ask again, why , why why cling to this religion?

irrefutible....my ass!!!!

get real, mate!

come back to realtiy!

oeps. you can't.
farmerman
 
  1  
Reply Thu 9 Oct, 2014 08:17 am
@Quehoniaomath,
name something you can refute in evolutionary SCIENCES . iLL GIVE YOU A START ,
0 Replies
 
farmerman
 
  1  
Reply Thu 9 Oct, 2014 08:17 am
@Quehoniaomath,
name something you can refute in evolutionary SCIENCES . iLL GIVE YOU A START ,
Quehoniaomath
 
  0  
Reply Thu 9 Oct, 2014 10:08 am
@farmerman,
Quote:
name something you can refute in evolutionary SCIENCES . iLL GIVE YOU A START ,


Oh boy oh boy, you really don't get it.
It IS a hoax from the start! The Lunar society remember!
Everything build on a hoax is fundamentally flawed.

evolutions is wrong because of:
statistics, according to statistics evolution is IMpossible.
And there there is the fact that life has come fron now life! LOL that is the best joke I ever heard! O course that is impossibe.
And again, the numerous hoaxes on behalf of Mr. Evolution,
And so on and so forth.

Evolution is really a joke and one giant big hoax.

I keep repeating that, because that how religionistic-evolutionist-indoctrination-idiots work, as a child till they grow very old keep repeating that evolution is real and they can't think any other way,
It is rather communistic actually.
farmerman
 
  1  
Reply Thu 9 Oct, 2014 11:30 am
@Quehoniaomath,
With your "statistics skreeslope You've merely re-stated the Fred Hoyle position and also fail to recognize several important points of the occurences of biological sequences(phyla and sub -phyla)

1The Fred Hoyle "Statistical impossibility" of evolution is predicated upon a sequential occurence of the sequences rather than simultaneous ones.

2Statistical estimates that ignore the non-random elements predetermined within chemistry and physics are meaningless and downright silly. Fred Hoyle, you must recall, was a "fan" of panspermia as the story of how life appeared (Hizzown arguments declare that life's start is merely "pushed back" to some other galaxy nd time

3in summarizing, mutations occur randomly and simultaneously among ALL the species, whereas Natural selection is a non-random response. We can "statistically" measure adaptational nat selection in todays species. We have compelling evidence of the natural selection of species within our own history of sentience. To deny what e can see with our own eyes is merely DENIAL based upon some religious belief, not some "appreciation for the truth".
If you deny something you should first understand it and try to find the workings and mistakes.

The Lunar Society has some place of reverence in your mind. It was no more a serious entity than was the Hasty Pudding Society or the Ignoble Prize Committee. So I cant comment on a "mens social club" being some cabal of satanic thought. (I think youre just looney with this obsession)

Youd gotten a bit broken -up toward the end of your post but I must reiterate that REAL SCIENCE has made no "devils compact" with natural selection. It is nothing more than a reasonable solution for the appearance and development of life on our planet. SO MANY interlocking and unrelated aspects of evidence have appeared over the last 150 years that the thory of evolution is daily reinforced.

REMEMBER
The thory of evolution by natural selection is an explanation of lifes occurrence in which ALL of the evidence fits the theory and NO EVIDENCE REFUTES IT. A scientist like Mike Behe would just LOVE to be the guy who finds evidence for theistic evolution, its just that none of his work has yielded anything usable to him.

Your need to try to draft "Statistics" in support of your denial of the theory is totally incorrect since life- statistics is based upon a series of step- functions that always begins with AN UNKNOWN SAMPLE SIZE interacting with a number of UNKNOWN SIMULTANEOUS occurences through time . Maybe that's why it first took almost 4 Billion years to develop and produce a fully adaptable "working model" of a multicellular organism from which all respiring and transpiring plants and animals arose, and then only 550 million years in which ALL sub- phyla of plants and animals appear.
Quehoniaomath
 
  0  
Reply Thu 9 Oct, 2014 02:24 pm
@farmerman,
bla bla bla


I don't even read your stupid postings. You don't know how to use statistics, logic, common sense, and so forth. It just aches once brain!

You are just clinging to your stupid religion.
If you want to go ahead, be my guest. It is your birthright.
But don't to try convince open minded thinking people of your bullshit your clinging so depsperately on.

Please don't waste your time by reacting on my postings!
I thought you have learned by now, well, you just proved to me there is no evolution at all! because you keep stuck at te the same level


Have a nice day,oh strange one

farmerman
 
  1  
Reply Thu 9 Oct, 2014 02:34 pm
@Quehoniaomath,
I must relly scare you. First you accuse me of adhominem attacks and now you try to ignore me based upon your denial of facts and evidence.


I could always sink to your level of intelligence and engage in your type of argument which is whining about your missed education and mindless denial. However, my need to contribute something accurate prevents me.

0 Replies
 
Quehoniaomath
 
  0  
Reply Thu 9 Oct, 2014 02:39 pm
please fm stop it, it is no use

Quote:
1 Reply
User ignored (view)
0 Replies
 
farmerman
 
  2  
Reply Thu 9 Oct, 2014 02:40 pm
@Herald,
"evidence" is like elephant, it is both singular and plural.

Quote:
about the process of evolution. All you have are DNA sequences that don't match your theory,
Says the one who, a decade of pages back, didn't even understand the numbers of amino acids and proteins involved in the coding tasks of
DNA. Im gonna take critique from you? hrdly dude, youre not even a neophyte. You are a Wikipedia trcker who gthers unrelated "factoids" in order not to sound stupid.

Why not talk with Quahog, you both are equally ignorant.
0 Replies
 
 

Related Topics

Intelligent Design - Question by giujohn
What is Intelligent Design? - Discussion by RexRed
Do *ANY* creationists understand evolution? - Discussion by rosborne979
The Bed Bug/Parasite Plant Theory - Question by TeePee38
dna worlds - Discussion by Syamsu
DD VERSUS EVOLUTION - Discussion by Setanta
The Evil of god - Discussion by giujohn
 
Copyright © 2024 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.05 seconds on 05/15/2024 at 04:26:33