Intelligent Design vs. Casino Universe

@Quehoniaomath,

Wow, you must have used more than your daily allotment of synapses with all that. Now eat your birdseed and try to west your yiddow beak.

1 Reply

@farmerman,

Quote:

Wow, you must have used more than your daily allotment of synapses with all that. Now eat your birdseed and try to west your yiddow beak.

And, and, YES, he dit it again!!!! unbelievable but true!

btw between us do you really BELIEVE that evolution shite? Wink

1 Reply

@Quehoniaomath,

do you mean, "Do I believe that all the facts and evidence about evolution are true?"
OF COURSE.

The mounds of evidence are easily seen in museums, isotope labs, genetics labds etc.
Whats not to believe?
(Of course, I realize that your head is warmly tucked up your ass so you ritually deny everything from that position).
I understand that you deny (among other things,)
modern physics
the moon landings
public education
911 was caused by terrorist from the Middle East
algebra
What else don't you buy into?

You are very entertaining though. Your "arguments" are lean and lame and your worldview is that of an apostle of Eric von Daniken

How can you even read a post?

1 Reply

@farmerman,

Quote:

do you mean, "Do I believe that all the facts and evidence about evolution are true?"
OF COURSE.

ok , so it is only a BELIEVE! Because WHAT facts, WHAT evidence???
SHOW US!!!!

Quote:

The mounds of evidence are easily seen in museums, isotope labs, genetics labds etc.

WHAT EXACTLY? WHERE? you are not saying anyuthing here.
You are just saying, there is evidence here and there. but you don't say a thing!

Quote:

Whats not to believe?

THERE IS NO EVIDENCE MATE!!! Why don't you get that?

Quote:

(Of course, I realize that your head is warmly tucked up your ass so you ritually deny everything from that position).

YES, Thwere it! An AH again!!!! I don't deny everything, I am looking for truth.

Quote:

I understand that you deny (among other things,)
modern physics
the moon landings
public education
911 was caused by terrorist from the Middle East

Yep, BUT on basis of years of research!

Quote:

algebra

I never denied algebra.

Quote:

What else don't you buy into?

If this world is build on thousand of lies , waht do you think?
But I have one more for you: money! That also doesn't exist, but
you won't get it, because you buy in the illusion that 'money' is real.
It really is not. But he, that is for anothe therad, and way too difficult for you, because in all your postings I see you can't think straight.

Quote:

You are very entertaining though. Your "arguments" are lean and lame and your worldview is that of an apostle of Eric von Daniken

Wow you are confused again. I think Eric von Daniken was wrong.
My 'arguments' are lame to you because you don't like and understand them, that is all.

Quote:

How can you even read a post?

I can't

And YES, we have a new AH!!!!!!!

Now, waiting for the next shoe to drop.

btw Reading Farmerboy is very very very funny and he takes himself way too seriously, it is laughable.

1 Reply

@Quehoniaomath,

apparently illiteracy is your basic problem.

Ive been quite open with evidence. YOU, fella, seem to merely deny without even understanding.
THAT is the mark of illiteracy.

PS, who is the "us" of whom you speak?
Ive found that most people here, with a very small group of religiously-based science "deniers", are quite intelligent and accept the facts and evidence of which I spoke. SO are you one of the religiously-led Fundamentalist science deniers? Or are you a member of some new branch of denial ?

Either way, Ive found that most of your ilk are unable to process information and would rather believe in weird conspiracies and myths without doing any analyses of their own.

Several of the deniers here, in most areas, are relatively intelligent people who just have these weird problems in occluded thinking , as if they just automatically deny things that require some time investment, and they have a formulaic means of processing information that is solely based upon Biblical Fundamentalist doctrine.

Many other of the religious are beyond Fundamentalist doctrines and have incorporated evolution by natural selection into their useable heap of information.

You, however, seem to be a whole nother type of denialist.
As I said, disussing science with you would be like discussing Post-Imressionism to a budgie.

1 Reply

@farmerman,

Quote:

apparently illiteracy is your basic problem.

Ive been quite open with evidence. YOU, fella, seem to merely deny without even understanding.
THAT is the mark of illiteracy.

PS, who is the "us" of whom you speak?
Ive found that most people here, with a very small group of religiously-based science "deniers", are quite intelligent and accept the facts and evidence of which I spoke. SO are you one of the religiously-led Fundamentalist science deniers? Or are you a member of some new branch of denial ?

Either way, Ive found that most of your ilk are unable to process information and would rather believe in weird conspiracies and myths without doing any analyses of their own.

Several of the deniers here, in most areas, are relatively intelligent people who just have these weird problems in occluded thinking , as if they just automatically deny things that require some time investment, and they have a formulaic means of processing information that is solely based upon Biblical Fundamentalist doctrine.

Many other of the religious are beyond Fundamentalist doctrines and have incorporated evolution by natural selection into their useable heap of information.

You, however, seem to be a whole nother type of denialist.
As I said, disussing science with you would be like discussing Post-Imressionism to a budgie.

Ok, so you have no evidence at all!

Allrighty then! Why then continue this evolution nonsense?

1 Reply

@Quehoniaomath,

no, you just ignore reding all thts already been posted since thi thread began. If youre so interested in denying evidence afresh, go back and read many of my (or several other peoples posts) who have provided such evidence. Don't use your inability to understand as an excuse .

You are quaite a dim bulb ir.

1 Reply

@farmerman,

Quote:

no, you just ignore reding all thts already been posted since thi thread began. If youre so interested in denying evidence afresh, go back and read many of my (or several other peoples posts) who have provided such evidence. Don't use your inability to understand as an excuse

.

You wish I hadn't read it, but I have!!!
And I haven't seen any evidence at all!!!
NOWHERE IN THIS THREAD!!

The evidence is only to be seen by the people who believe this bullshit!
(it is in the 'minds of man')
Futhermore, you are writing that people who don't believe in the evolution ****, must be religious??? Really??? Do you really think there are no people out there who aren't religious and still reject the evolution ughhh theory??
Of course there are!!! Look them up!!!

Quote:

You are quaite a dim bulb ir.

And here he is again!!! the master rof Ad Hominems!!!!!!!!!!

But, I must say FB, you are really very good at wishfull thinking!!!

Maybe a bit too good , for your sake!!

Wink

1 Reply

@Quehoniaomath,

If you've read the things presented, what is your denial based upon?

1You don't accept the evidence?

2SCience is lying?
3God says it otherways?
4 Genetics, paleontology, embryology, knock-out genes, stratigraphy, isotope chronology are all fakes?

Or do you just not understand whats being presented and don't want to look stupid

(However, what with all the points of denial that youve occupied since showing up on A2K, your record as a "seeker of truth" is non-existent)

Eg, what do you have , say, against the fossil record in its demonstration of intermediate forms of organisms through time? Lets take fish to amphibians. Whats your beef?

1 Reply

@farmerman,

what the **** has god to with this!!?

and , again, the evidence is ONLY in THE MIND OF MAN

Just try some other glasses mate!!

2 Replies

@Quehoniaomath,

now Im feeding the troll.

2 Replies

@farmerman,

So, anyone disagreeing with your belief is a troll?

Go figure!

0 Replies

@Herald,

Herald wrote:

Quehoniaomath wrote:
Well, now, what does this say?? Errrr......NOTHING of course.
It says everything - it says that some people are light years ahead as fakirs of the misrepresentation. They state out 2% as something insignificant and casually forget to say how much is that 2%, how much is 0.02 x 4^3 000 000 000 ... and how such diversion in the DNA sequences is done by one single mutated individual - a tiny miss, hiding a huge gap in the misinterpretation of the things. Why does this resemble so much the 'methodology' of explanation of the Time.Space Continuum and the Gravitational Continuum? ... and isn't it high time to have some Evolutionary Continuum as well.

Just so you don't misrepresent anything, maybe you should tell us exactly how many of the pairs in human DNA actually contribute to who we are and how many are dormant or don't contribute.

Don't be a fakir here Herald. Tell us the exact number.

0 Replies

@Quehoniaomath,

Quehoniaomath wrote:

what the **** has god to with this!!?

and , again, the evidence is ONLY in THE MIND OF MAN

Just try some other glasses mate!!

Philosophically all evidence is in the mind of man so you seem to be arguing that you have no evidence that there is no evidence.

1 Reply

@farmerman,

farmerman wrote:

now Im feeding the troll.

Afraid so.

You usually do not do that!

0 Replies

@farmerman,

farmerman wrote:

it actually shows that you have no idea about genetics at all.

In the capacity of a prominent Geologist, why don't you explain us how the genetics works?

farmerman wrote:

one gene can be respponible for many polymorphs and many genes may be responsible for one.

This claim says nothing unless you have some definition of 'responsible' - some process would be O.K.

farmerman wrote:

Cience is still looking at the effect of SNP as epigenes.

FM, your greatest problem is that you are trying to present the opponents as complete and rounded idiots. Do you remember when you claimed in this post that there is no soft tissue (and genetic material) from fossils of species older than 10 thousand years ago. ... and do you know what is the ugly news - there IS genetic material taken from almost all the dinosaurs, and there are survived species from the era of the dinos that have not become birds ... and the claim about the dinos becoming birds in order to survive the acidification of the air onto the moment of extinction (65 Mya) is mind-blowing ... as a minimum.
Can you name the birds that 'have evolved' from Tyrannosaurus Rex, for example? How has the acid rain destroyed the shells of the eggs of the dinos only ... and somehow missed to destroy the shells of the eggs of the birds (for example)? ... and how exactly the metamorphosis of the dinos into birds has helped them to save their eggs from the acid rain?

1 Reply

@Herald,

Quote:

you claimed in this post that there is no soft tissue (and genetic material) from fossils of species older than 10 thousand years ago. ... and do you know what is the ugly news -

Please point that out . You most often try to miscast what others say well after they've said it .(That way no one will try to correct you)
If I said such a thing, point it out to me (perhaps you didn't understand what was said since English isn't your native tongue nd often you just miss the meanings of phrases)

Quote:

there IS genetic material taken from almost all the dinosaurs, and there are survived species from the era of the dinos that have not become birds .

No there isn't, . NO GENETIC MATERIAL HAS EVER BEEN FOUND TO COME FROM dino "soft tissue" . Several amino acids precursors had been recovered but no genetic material ANYWHERE. If you claim that it so, you should publish this as a fact (or at least try)
There are hundreds of thousands of reptile species that derive from the various classes of ancient reptiles---SO WHAT??
Reptiles, "From the era of dinosaurs" and " reptiles derived from From dinosaurs" are two totally different things don't you agree?
Evidence strongly suggests that dinosaurs were ALL killed off by several cataclysmic events at the end of the Cretaceous.

EVIDENCE also strongly suggests that birds are evolved from Saurichian Dinosaurs back in the late Triassic and early Cretaceous. EVidence is very strong and would take several hundred pages to do a fairly complete job of disclosing it all.
You really don't care about any evidence since you would deny it all as "made up" or "false"(You've not been too open mined about evidence up till this point so I see no reason that youd have an "HA" moment nd suddenly deny your Christian Fundamentalism.

1 Reply

@farmerman,

Quote:

. EVidence is very strong and would take several hundred pages to do a fairly complete job of disclosing it all.

LOL

Now there is way to hide bullshit!!

Yeaaaaah we have lots of 'evidence' but we can't show ya!!!

Right!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

0 Replies

Quote:

FM, your greatest problem is that you are trying to present the opponents as complete and rounded idiots

To me it seems his only problem!

0 Replies

@parados,

Quote:

Philosophically all evidence is in the mind of man so you seem to be arguing that you have no evidence that there is no evidence.

Nice try mate, but won't work!
Especially the evidence for evolution is ONLY in tne "Mind of Men"
Because there is no evidence! Nowhere! People who believe this shite, just see things that aren't there at all!

1 Reply

Intelligent Design vs. Casino Universe

Related Topics

Quick Links

My Account

able2know