32
   

Intelligent Design vs. Casino Universe

 
 
George
 
  1  
Reply Fri 15 Aug, 2014 09:21 am
@Quehoniaomath,
Thanks
0 Replies
 
Romeo Fabulini
 
  1  
Reply Fri 15 Aug, 2014 09:33 am
Quote:
Parados said to Q: And I see the aliens have duped you into believing they have a base on a moon that doesn't exist. They are living amongst us but you clearly don't know that and haven't done the research.

Yes they may well be living among us to watch us and send messages back to their big boss about how we're shaping up (the word "angel" also means "messenger"), and maybe their moonbase is where they go for breaks..Wink
"Do not forget to entertain strangers, for by so doing some people have entertained angels unawares"- (Bible: Hebrews 13:2)

PS- an X-Files episode titled 'Gender Bender' was about a cult who called themselves 'The Kindred' and dressed in black and lived in an old farmhouse. At the end they all disappear, and Mulder and Scully find a crop circle where their ship had blasted off-

http://i53.photobucket.com/albums/g64/PoorOldSpike/X-Files-Kindred.gif~original
0 Replies
 
George
 
  2  
Reply Fri 15 Aug, 2014 09:39 am
Unfortunately Who Built the Moon by Christopher Knight and Alan
Butler (page 67) contains the following:

"We can be certain that twelve astronauts walked on the Moon between
1969 and 1972 and that they brought back 842 pounds of the Moon in the
form of rocks, core samples, pebbles, sand and fine dust from six different
exploration sites."


What are we to make of such a statement?
cicerone imposter
 
  1  
Reply Fri 15 Aug, 2014 10:31 am
@George,
I think the answer lies in what the newspaper stated this morning about scientists looking at dusts collected from the rockets sent Mars. They now believe they will find the answer to the god cell in those dusts. Who knows?

Quehoniaomath
 
  2  
Reply Fri 15 Aug, 2014 11:02 am
@George,
Quote:
Unfortunately Who Built the Moon by Christopher Knight and Alan
Butler (page 67) contains the following:

"We can be certain that twelve astronauts walked on the Moon between
1969 and 1972 and that they brought back 842 pounds of the Moon in the
form of rocks, core samples, pebbles, sand and fine dust from six different
exploration sites."

What are we to make of such a statement?


I will check, I don't think it is in mine.
On the other hand, both writers are high degree freemasons, so they do mix in a lot of lies with the truth, so discernment is neeeded, that is true.

So you have to check the arguments and think about them yourself.

George
 
  1  
Reply Fri 15 Aug, 2014 12:07 pm
@Quehoniaomath,
Quehoniaomath wrote:
. . . so discernment is neeeded, that is true . . .
I could not agree more.
0 Replies
 
parados
 
  1  
Reply Fri 15 Aug, 2014 12:11 pm
@Quehoniaomath,
Ridicule? Is that what you ride instead of a unicycle?
0 Replies
 
parados
 
  1  
Reply Fri 15 Aug, 2014 12:18 pm
@Quehoniaomath,
Quote:

So you have to check the arguments and think about them yourself.

Now you are assuming that the aliens aren't doing your thinking for you. They may well be to keep you in the dark about what is really happening.

You haven't noticed any probing sensations lately, have you?
Herald
 
  0  
Reply Sat 16 Aug, 2014 11:27 am
@cicerone imposter,
cicerone imposter wrote:
I think the answer lies in what the newspaper stated this morning about scientists looking at dusts collected from the rockets sent Mars. They now believe they will find the answer to the god cell in those dusts. Who knows?
     Ci, with every day and in any way you are becoming greater and greater believer in God. With that rate some day you may become His greatest worshipper.
0 Replies
 
farmerman
 
  3  
Reply Sat 16 Aug, 2014 12:13 pm
@parados,
Quote:

You haven't noticed any probing sensations lately, have you?
Recently Ive mused that, if aliens actually can learn anything from probing assholes, they couldnt find a better one than Quahog
cicerone imposter
 
  1  
Reply Sat 16 Aug, 2014 02:01 pm
@farmerman,
They're (aliens) are learning that humans aren't too bright; they see Quahog and just throw up! They were expecting more from homo sapiens - when we sent men to the moon and ships to Mars.
Herald
 
  0  
Reply Sun 17 Aug, 2014 12:38 pm
@cicerone imposter,
cicerone imposter wrote:
They're (aliens) are learning that humans aren't too bright.
     You are talking as if you have any evidences that 'people are bright'. What evidences do you have in connection with that? We are destroying the only known environment that we can leave in - is that what you call brightness? Besides that you are talking as if it is absolutely impossible for the aliens to exist ... notwithstanding that all the math inferences show otherwise? Where are you so sure from?
cicerone imposter wrote:
They were expecting more from homo sapiens
     This is just a statement thrown up into the air, for there is no way for you to be so omniscient to know what and how the aliens might think without knowing them.
0 Replies
 
Herald
 
  0  
Reply Wed 20 Aug, 2014 01:53 am
@Quehoniaomath,
Quehoniaomath wrote:
Who Built the Moon

Obviously the Big Bang ... theory.
Herald
 
  0  
Reply Thu 21 Aug, 2014 08:48 am
@cicerone imposter,
cicerone imposter wrote:
They're (aliens) are learning that humans aren't too bright
     How did you come to know that you are 'too bright' ... if you compare yourself with yourself all the time?
0 Replies
 
Quehoniaomath
 
  0  
Reply Wed 27 Aug, 2014 11:31 am
@Herald,
No, The Big Bang theory is false, and...ridiculous,
Herald
 
  1  
Reply Wed 27 Aug, 2014 11:51 am
@Quehoniaomath,
Quehoniaomath wrote:
No, The Big Bang theory is false, and...ridiculous
      ... and why is it 'the home pet' of a lot of 'scientists'?
Quehoniaomath
 
  1  
Reply Wed 27 Aug, 2014 12:19 pm
@Herald,
Quote:
.. and why is it 'the home pet' of a lot of 'scientists'?


It fits with their belief system. Wink

Actually this is the fallacy of popularity.

But it is not important how many screwed up idiots ( read scientists) believe in this nonsense, The only thing important is if it is true or not.

And well, it is not true , of course Wink

See my thread "There was no Biggie Bangie"!
Herald
 
  1  
Reply Wed 27 Aug, 2014 09:20 pm
@Quehoniaomath,
Quehoniaomath wrote:
It fits with their belief system. Wink
     They claim that they have no belief system, for they simply 'know' how 'the objective reality' looks like ... on the grounds of fake assumptions and misinterpreted 'evidences'. Where do you see here 'their beliefs'?
Quehoniaomath wrote:
Actually this is the fallacy of popularity.
     IMV there is a whole constellation of logical fallacies, collection series:
     appeal to ignorance - so and so 99% of the polulation will never start understanding what gravitational continuum is (without the quantum carrier in the Nothing 'before' the Big Bang) and time.space continuum (without any plausible interpretation for the physical existence of Time in the physical world) and space expansion might be - hence everything goes.
     argument from authority - we have awarded thousands of Nobel Prices to easy-makers, rising in the science on the grounds of misusing with incomplete, incorrect, and misinterpreted information and data, so there is no way for this theory to be pronounced fake ... for we will become a laughing stock
     appeal to consequences - If one doesn't believe in the Big Bang and/or Evolution he is 'obviously' retard of seventh star magnitude.
     bandwagon fallacy - the Big Bang has been so many times 'peer reviewed', and so many forests have been cut to publish the papers 'evidencing its existence' that there is no way for it to be a fake theory ... as it actually is.
     confirmation bias - only the 'evidences' that conform that 'theory' are presented to the public - & any contradictions in the self, proves for impossibility to exist in the physical world, etc. are conveniently neglected and swept under the table.
Quehoniaomath
 
  1  
Reply Wed 27 Aug, 2014 11:14 pm
@Herald,
Quote:
They claim that they have no belief system, for they simply 'know' how 'the objective reality' looks like ... on the grounds of fake assumptions and misinterpreted 'evidences'. Where do you see here 'their beliefs'?


of course they think "they" have no belief system, but I don't care, it is very obvious "they" do. science is rather laughable, and stupid,, and myopic.

Quote:
IMV there is a whole constellation of logical fallacies, collection series:


so true, but e.g in science 'circular argument seem to flourish the best Wink

0 Replies
 
farmerman
 
  1  
Reply Thu 28 Aug, 2014 09:36 am
A lab study for students of genetics in which they look at island biogeography and its results in the genetics ND MORPHOLOGY OF A SPECIES (OR THREE) in real time.

Theres a whole coupla lab books on evolutionary studies. The IDers are starting to getsweaty s the ground upon which they stand is swallowing them up.

http://www.ucmp.berkeley.edu/fosrec/Filson.html
 

Related Topics

Intelligent Design - Question by giujohn
What is Intelligent Design? - Discussion by RexRed
Do *ANY* creationists understand evolution? - Discussion by rosborne979
The Bed Bug/Parasite Plant Theory - Question by TeePee38
dna worlds - Discussion by Syamsu
DD VERSUS EVOLUTION - Discussion by Setanta
The Evil of god - Discussion by giujohn
 
Copyright © 2024 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.07 seconds on 05/02/2024 at 06:04:34