@Quehoniaomath,
Quehoniaomath wrote: It fits with their belief system.
They claim that they have no
belief system, for they simply 'know' how 'the objective reality' looks like ... on the grounds of fake assumptions and misinterpreted 'evidences'. Where do you see here 'their beliefs'?
Quehoniaomath wrote:Actually this is the fallacy of popularity.
IMV there is a whole constellation of logical fallacies, collection series:
appeal to ignorance - so and so 99% of the polulation will never start understanding what
gravitational continuum is (without the quantum carrier in the
Nothing 'before' the Big Bang) and
time.space continuum (without any plausible interpretation for the physical existence of Time in the physical world) and
space expansion might be - hence everything goes.
argument from authority - we have awarded thousands of Nobel Prices to easy-makers, rising in the science on the grounds of misusing with incomplete, incorrect, and misinterpreted information and data, so there is no way for this theory to be pronounced fake ... for we will become a laughing stock
appeal to consequences - If one doesn't believe in the Big Bang and/or Evolution he is 'obviously' retard of seventh star magnitude.
bandwagon fallacy - the Big Bang has been so many times 'peer reviewed', and so many forests have been cut to publish the papers 'evidencing its existence' that there is no way for it to be a fake theory ... as it actually is.
confirmation bias - only the 'evidences' that conform that 'theory' are presented to the public - & any contradictions in the self, proves for impossibility to exist in the physical world, etc. are conveniently neglected and swept under the table.