Intelligent Design vs. Casino Universe

@Quehoniaomath,

You're off your ****'g meds! Prove from anything farmerman ever posted on a2k that any 14 year old is more knowledgeable on gmo?

Please provide credible sources. Otherwise, go **** yourself! Your opinions are worthless shyt.

3 Replies

@cicerone imposter,

CI, he's probably a ten year old.

0 Replies

@cicerone imposter,

Quote:

You're off your ****'g meds! Prove from anything farmerman ever posted on a2k that any 14 year old is more knowledgeable on gmo?

Please provide credible sources. Otherwise, go **** yourself! Your opinions are worthless shyt.

Take it easy ci.

An infant might be better placed than fm due to knowing nothing about the matter. Once people get it into their heads they know something about something they have a tendency to run off at the mouth about it. It's a polite form of aggression.

1 Reply

@cicerone imposter,

Quote:

You're off your ****'g meds! Prove from anything farmerman ever posted on a2k that any 14 year old is more knowledgeable on gmo?

Please provide credible sources. Otherwise, go **** yourself! Your opinions are worthless shyt.

Watch this 14 Year Old GMO Activist Smackdown This Bullying 'Shark Tank' Entrepreneur
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ec1Rvd4lyNw

and there is more...

fm looks very stupid compared with her!

enjoy! Wink

1 Reply

@Herald,

Quote:

FM, do you know which is the saddest news - the saddest news is that if you really are that knowledgeable as you claim, you would be able to pack a cap of powder with bone morphogenetic proteins and some carrier of genetic code and rehabilitate teeth, for example. Do you know why you are light years away from this and why you will never be able to do anything even resembling this at first approximation - because presenting some mumbo jumbo about genetics on the net is very much different from understanding the processes underlying & driving life,

then you should quit trying to keep posting your mumbo jumbo. its obviously got you all worked up and spitting mad.
Everything Ive posted in response to your gibberish hs been solid reproducible FACT. You've been trying to wobble and tack andchange subjects(to no avail since youre obviously unequipped).
I wont argue with you about computer codes
.So try not to dance around in my court, youre unarmed.

1 Reply

@Quehoniaomath,

Quote:

ha ha there are 14 years old girls who can beat someone like fm about gmo

so you sound like one of em, why not gimme your best shot douche baguette.

0 Replies

http://www.kidsrighttoknow.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/11/Rona-Ambrose-2014-Web-1-1024x671.jpg

1 Reply

@Quehoniaomath,

are you a coward to jump in and try to debate what IS or IS NOT GMO??
I imagine that neither you nor Herald have one real idea .

Is cloning or embryo rescue GMO?
Is layering or grafting GMO?
Too bad youre not that bright to be able to sustain a decent argument. I love to point at idiots like ypou and yell to other people
"SEE, heres your champions"!!
"If you want to be like them, just don't pay attention in biology class"

0 Replies

@spendius,

Go back to yur brew, spendi. You're better off not making yourself look stupid on a2k.

1 Reply

@Quehoniaomath,

Shows how much you pay attention dickface. Where did I say anywhere that I WAS FOR GMO? Im merely taking Herald to task because he doesn't even know what is or is not GMO. (ANd besides-HE ran to GMO because he was losing his footing in his defense of ID)
The 14 year old kid is correct that a diet just with rice and no other veggies or fish will be deficient in Vitamin A. It like trying to survive on a diet o celery.

Jeez what a dope you are. You don't even understand the argument you idiot.

0 Replies

@cicerone imposter,

Quote:

Go back to yur brew, spendi. You're better off not making yourself look stupid on a2k.

bla bla bla bla

1 Reply

@Quehoniaomath,

hmmm, at least spendi is able to compound words of more than one syllable

0 Replies

@farmerman,

farmerman wrote:

then you should quit trying to keep posting your mumbo jumbo. its obviously got you all worked up and spitting mad.

FM, why are you attacking me? All that I said is that you play genetic hazards at macro level, which is actually phenomenology and has nothing to do with facts and understanding the micro processes. At micro- and nano-level you don't even try to test these, not to say that you even don't know how would the test vectors look like.
If you are such a great fan of phenomenology, why don't you throw an eye on the statistics, for example: % of increased cases of obesity worldwide, high blood pressure, insulin resistance, diabetes, fatty liver due to junk food, cancer, MS, osteoporosis, dentistry ... to name just a few.
BTW this thread is not about GMO.

2 Replies

@Herald,

Quote:

All that I said is that you play genetic hazards at macro level, which is actually phenomenology and has nothing to do with facts and understanding the micro processes. At micro- and nano-level you don't even try to test these, not to say that you even don't know how would the test vectors look like

WHAAAAAT? You've strung some words together but they make no sense.
What "Macro" aspects in hybridization are you talking about? Im not the one whose angry, you seem to be losing your temper in every post, be calm,take single points and try to make sense.

1 Reply

@farmerman,

Quote:

WHAAAAAT? You've strung some words together but they make no sense.

I understood what H said fm. It is simple. I'll admit I would have said it in a different way possibly referring to Quantum Mechanics.

The comparison at Dover between a flagella and a foot pump was nursery school phenomenology. To think that objects are only as they appear in your consciousness is solipsistic. Which is a distortion of reality which can even be applied to the self. Saying "I'm a geologist" is a good example.

Can you still not make up your mind whether we are machines or not? Or are you hoping the question goes away?

It won't. It can't.

1 Reply

@spendius,

Quote:

you play genetic hazards at macro level, which is actually phenomenology

maybe you can explain what this means, in plain English. How Can something be phenomenology if I PLAY IT. You and he can play Cheshire cat I am somewhat more grounded in real communication.

2 Replies

@Herald,

Hers an example of a culturally based definition of FRANKENFOOD. I must give a shout-out to Tsarstepan for his efforst on the thread by the same name. e create Frankenfood variations often from our childhoods.
GMO poisons have coopted the term , which I wouldn't because many of the compilations are dangerous and "Frankenfood" sounds more like a joke.

0 Replies

@farmerman,

Quote:

. How Can something be phenomenology if I PLAY IT.

Because the "I" playing it is what phenomenology means.

For example--take two ladies reacting to a mouse running around. I dare say Mrs fm reacts to a mouse with the cool appropriate in a farmer's squeeze. Other ladies are up on a chair shrieking and holding their hands between their knees ferociously. I have witnessed both.

Each perceives reality their own way.

A teacher explaining to the little monsters how a sodium electron nips across to fill a vacancy in chlorine's deshabille. Or else the other way round. I've forgotten for sure. Visual aid on the blackboard with chalk circles. The teacher's picture of reality. Dinned into the teacher's consciousness by previous experience of science lessons and having to accept it to get a diploma or some other sort of academic junk bond certificate. Plus $100,000 in debt. (Who the **** gets their grubby little mitts on that?)

What innocence to think only the Church can work that sort of magic.

But the World Cup is on.

1 Reply

@spendius,

and youre late for your meds again. Keep it up, itll make sense to you

1 Reply

@farmerman,

farmerman wrote:

How Can something be phenomenology if I PLAY IT.

If we take the religious and philosophical interpretation of phenomenology - the personal experience as evidence for reality - when you gamble with the genetics you experience yourself as God, as the Creator of the Universe and as direct heir of the Big Bang, as somebody or something, who can create anything ... without even knowing what this is doing, and what such 'creations' may cause.
If we take the scientific interpretation of phenomenology - the part of knowledge that relates empirical observations of phenomena - you have two pieces of genetic code and you can observe how would they behave in this and that case, after that you combine them and suggest that they will have this and this behaviour as a result of the combined phenomenology ... without even proving that the analogy in the inference is possible ... not to say without understanding what you are doing, what happens with the processes at micro- and nano-level ... and what such combinatorics may cause, to our body metabolism for example.

0 Replies

Intelligent Design vs. Casino Universe

Related Topics

Quick Links

My Account

able2know