What's the chance of Ted Cruz becoming president?

Your hatred of Israel is palpable. But you ignore the incessant Pal attacks on Israel and the Jews since even before Israel was created. You ignore the Pal persecution of minorities, including Christians, as well as their persecution of women, gays, non-Muslims, et al.

You ignore the Pal persecution of minorities, including Christians, as well as their persecution of women, gays, non-Muslims, et al.

I'm not racist.
I'm a speciesist.

She provides an important service to readers. I am afraid that you are merely a slave to PC.

Don't waste your time with Advocate. He's a nasty racist.

Finn dAbuzz wrote:

Yes silly.

Because liberal politicians have no political reason to loudly declare that they are liberal, there are no liberal politicians.

That's, at best, silly.

Whether or not they choose to self-identify as liberals, if they walk like a liberal and quack like a liberal...

Get it now?

Frank Apisa wrote:

Yup. If they do not agree with the political philosophy of the right (mostly the extreme right)...they are liberals.

No matter what...you conservatives seem to outnumber them and have by far the richer pickings. Yet they seem to be such a problem for you. And you guys are always moaning and groaning about what they are doing.

Sorta like the Super Bowl champs playing a small high school team and complaining about the tactics the high school team uses.

Do you get that?

So in your strange world Frank, there are no liberals, only people who disagree with right-wing extremists.

And still you insist that because there aren't hundreds of thousands of people wearing "I Am A Liberal!" signs around their necks there are no liberals (Nevermind that I have yet to see anyone wearing a "I Am An Extreme Right Winger!" sign)

Yours is a truly foolish argument, but hang on to it Frank. Maybe the conservative movement in America will take heed and stop calling themselves conservative and thereby elimnate any and all ability of liberals, like you, to rail against them.

Didn't they say that about tricky Dick and GWB?

Frank Apisa wrote:

Finn dAbuzz wrote:

Yes silly.

Because liberal politicians have no political reason to loudly declare that they are liberal, there are no liberal politicians.

That's, at best, silly.

Whether or not they choose to self-identify as liberals, if they walk like a liberal and quack like a liberal...

Get it now?

Frank Apisa wrote:

Yup. If they do not agree with the political philosophy of the right (mostly the extreme right)...they are liberals.

No matter what...you conservatives seem to outnumber them and have by far the richer pickings. Yet they seem to be such a problem for you. And you guys are always moaning and groaning about what they are doing.

Sorta like the Super Bowl champs playing a small high school team and complaining about the tactics the high school team uses.

Do you get that?

So in your strange world Frank, there are no liberals, only people who disagree with right-wing extremists.

And still you insist that because there aren't hundreds of thousands of people wearing "I Am A Liberal!" signs around their necks there are no liberals (Nevermind that I have yet to see anyone wearing a "I Am An Extreme Right Winger!" sign)

Yours is a truly foolish argument, but hang on to it Frank. Maybe the conservative movement in America will take heed and stop calling themselves conservative and thereby elimnate any and all ability of liberals, like you, to rail against them.

Learn to read, Finn.

At no point did I say there are no liberals.

I think conservatives greatly outnumber liberals in America. I think most surveys and polls bear me out.

What you are doing here is making stuff up; pretending it is what I said...and then saying that it is stupid.

That never works.

This is what far right wing Pamela Rosa said on her white victims of black crime thread.

Oh, and Izzy, I tend to deliberately abstain from seemingly diehard hate threads. I simply don't like feeding the beast and it's a waste of precious time going around in circles because the poster's hatred is too mentally embedded. There is little good to be gleaned from attempting to communicate with an insufferably whining racist.

Advocate didn't, at one point he admonished one of the detractors for having the temerity to post a white perpetrator of crime with a black victim. Don't take my word for it, if you follow the link, and go back a few pages you can read Advocate's comments. Then you can decide for yourself whether or not you think he's a racist.

Quote:

This is what far right wing Pamela Rosa said on her white victims of black crime thread.

Oh, and Izzy, I tend to deliberately abstain from seemingly diehard hate threads. I simply don't like feeding the beast and it's a waste of precious time going around in circles because the poster's hatred is too mentally embedded. There is little good to be gleaned from attempting to communicate with an insufferably whining racist.

two of the white girls i work with at the chicken plant in Alabama have blacks boyfriend that also works at the chicken plant. will they end up dead too?

I would not sell life insurance to those girls.

Your statement is pretty amusing considering your diehard hatred of Israel and the Jews. Interestingly, Izzy is equally anti-Israel and anti-Semitic. Moreover, you frequently post statements, almost always distorted, that reflect your hatred.

BTW, the site to which Izzy refers is fully documented with links, photos, etc. There no doubt a tremendous problem with black-on-white crime, and black racism. Pity the poor white male who goes to prison. Unless he immediately joins a white gang for protection, he will quickly be attacked and, most likely, raped by blacks. It is also documented that a white woman married to a black is 12 times more likely to be murdered by her spouse.