@hmcben,
It looks more like a "one off" serigraph than a litho. If its listed as a litho then its more of a litho process rather than using a stone in which the artist is involved. It a signed "poster' if that's the case.
It is very nice though. I like the design and the color contrasts.
Problem with many of these signed potters is tht the artist who signs it is going through an entire edition so his or her signature starts getting indecipherable quickly.
If it were a stone litho that the artist pulled, wed see probably an edition of 50 or less. How many are in this edition?