1
   

Smart People Believe Weird Things

 
 
Reply Wed 7 Apr, 2004 09:00 pm
This could also explain some irrational political beliefs. Razz

Quote:
Rarely does anyone weigh facts before deciding what to believe

By Michael Shermer

In April 1999, when I was on a lecture tour for my book Why People Believe Weird Things, the psychologist Robert Sternberg attended my presentation at Yale University. His response to the lecture was both enlightening and troubling. It is certainly entertaining to hear about other people's weird beliefs, Sternberg reflected, because we are confident that we would never be so foolish. But why do smart people fall for such things? Sternberg's challenge led to a second edition of my book, with a new chapter expounding on my answer to his question: Smart people believe weird things because they are skilled at defending beliefs they arrived at for nonsmart reasons.

Rarely do any of us sit down before a table of facts, weigh them pro and con, and choose the most logical and rational explanation, regardless of what we previously believed. Most of us, most of the time, come to our beliefs for a variety of reasons having little to do with empirical evidence and logical reasoning. Rather, such variables as genetic predisposition, parental predilection, sibling influence, peer pressure, educational experience and life impressions all shape the personality preferences that, in conjunction with numerous social and cultural influences, lead us to our beliefs. We then sort through the body of data and select those that most confirm what we already believe, and ignore or rationalize away those that do not.

This phenomenon, called the confirmation bias, helps to explain the findings published in the National Science Foundation's biennial report (April 2002) on the state of science understanding: 30 percent of adult Americans believe that UFOs are space vehicles from other civilizations; 60 percent believe in ESP; 40 percent think that astrology is scientific; 32 percent believe in lucky numbers; 70 percent accept magnetic therapy as scientific; and 88 percent accept alternative medicine.

Education by itself is no paranormal prophylactic. Although belief in ESP decreased from 65 percent among high school graduates to 60 percent among college graduates, and belief in magnetic therapy dropped from 71 percent among high school graduates to 55 percent among college graduates, that still leaves more than half fully endorsing such claims! And for embracing alternative medicine, the percentages actually increase, from 89 percent for high school grads to 92 percent for college grads.

We can glean a deeper cause of this problem in another statistic: 70 percent of Americans still do not understand the scientific process, defined in the study as comprehending probability, the experimental method and hypothesis testing. One solution is more and better science education, as indicated by the fact that 53 percent of Americans with a high level of science education (nine or more high school and college science/math courses) understand the scientific process, compared with 38 percent of those with a middle-level science education (six to eight such courses) and 17 percent with a low level (five or fewer courses).

The key here is teaching how science works, not just what science has discovered. We recently published an article in Skeptic (Vol. 9, No. 3) revealing the results of a study that found no correlation between science knowledge (facts about the world) and paranormal beliefs. The authors, W. Richard Walker, Steven J. Hoekstra and Rodney J. Vogl, concluded: "Students that scored well on these [science knowledge] tests were no more or less skeptical of pseudoscientific claims than students that scored very poorly. Apparently, the students were not able to apply their scientific knowledge to evaluate these pseudoscientific claims. We suggest that this inability stems in part from the way that science is traditionally presented to students: Students are taught what to think but not how to think."

To attenuate these paranormal belief statistics, we need to teach that science is not a database of unconnected factoids but a set of methods designed to describe and interpret phenomena, past or present, aimed at building a testable body of knowledge open to rejection or confirmation.

For those lacking a fundamental comprehension of how science works, the siren song of pseudoscience becomes too alluring to resist, no matter how smart you are.

Michael Shermer is publisher of Skeptic magazine (www.skeptic.com) and author of In Darwin's Shadow and Why People Believe Weird Things, just reissued.

Scientific American
  • Topic Stats
  • Top Replies
  • Link to this Topic
Type: Discussion • Score: 1 • Views: 741 • Replies: 15
No top replies

 
Titus
 
  1  
Reply Wed 7 Apr, 2004 09:10 pm
It's akin to Rush Limbaugh's weird science.

Consider:

LIMBAUGH: "We closed down a whole town--Times Beach, Mo.--over the threat of dioxin. We now know there was no reason to do that. Dioxin at those levels isn't harmful." (Ought to Be, p. 163)

REALITY: "The hypothesis that low exposures [to dioxin] are entirely safe for humans is distinctly less tenable now than before," editorialized the New England Journal of Medicine after publishing a study (1/24/91) on cancer mortality and dioxin. In 1993, after Limbaugh's book was written, a study of residents in Seveso, Italy had increased cancer rates after being exposed to dioxin, The EPA's director of environmental toxicology said this study removed one of the last remaining doubts about dioxin,s deadly effects (AP, 8/29/93).)

LIMBAUGH: Denouncing Jeremy Rifkin of the Beyond Beef campaign as an "ecopest": "Rifkin is bent out of shape because he says the cattle consume enough grain to feed hundreds of millions of people. The reason the cattle are eating the grain is so they can be fattened and slaughtered, after which they will feed people, who need a high protein diet." (Ought To Be, p. 110)

REALITY: Sixteen pounds of grain and soy is required to produce one pound of edible food from beef (USDA Economic Research Service). As for needing a "high-protein diet," the World Health Organizationand U.S. Department of Agriculture recommend that from 4.5 percent to 6 percent of daily calories come from protein. The amount of calories from protein in rice is 8 percent; in wheat it's 17 percent (USDA Handbook No. 456).)

LIMBAUGH: "Do you know we have more acreage of forest land in the United States today than we did at the time the constitution was written." (Radio show, 2/18/94))

REALITY: In what are now the 50 U.S. states, there were 850 million acres of forest land in the late 1700s vs. only 730 million today (The Bum's Rush, p. 136). Limbaugh's claim also ignores the fact that much of today's forests are single-species tree farms, as opposed to natural old-growth forests which support diverse ecosystems.)

So, there appears to be more than enough "weirdness" to go around.
0 Replies
 
Tarantulas
 
  1  
Reply Wed 7 Apr, 2004 10:30 pm
This is a little long but it's worth reading.

Quote:
Science Wars

FrontPageMagazine
0 Replies
 
Titus
 
  1  
Reply Thu 8 Apr, 2004 05:19 am
In response to this piece, I have a brief, two word response: Massey Energy. Mad
0 Replies
 
Setanta
 
  1  
Reply Thu 8 Apr, 2004 05:36 am
Well, i greatly enjoyed the first piece, despite the gratuitous attempt on Tarantalus' part to make political an apolitical subject. Which is of course, undertandable, because that was the pathetic attempt of the author of the second rant.

I'd like to express my deepfelt gratitude to Titus and Tarantalus for descending at such breathtaking speed into ranting partisan screed. Proof, if any were needed, that neither side has a lock on heedless sloganeering and shotgun-style invective.

Rolling Eyes
0 Replies
 
Tarantulas
 
  1  
Reply Thu 8 Apr, 2004 05:58 am
And we should probably thank Setanta for the predictable political rant without any concrete arguments to support it. Bringing emotion into a science discussion is like bringing a knife to a gunfight.
0 Replies
 
Titus
 
  1  
Reply Thu 8 Apr, 2004 06:10 am
"...thanks to the current bunch of crooks and liars in chief...." Setanta

If the above quote from Setanta doesn't reek of partisanship, then I am a conservative -- not! LOL!!!

Whereas, I am an unabashed and unapologetic partisan (what you see with me is what you get -- take it or leave it), Setanta, pretends not to be which is completely disingenuous.
[/color]
0 Replies
 
cavfancier
 
  1  
Reply Thu 8 Apr, 2004 06:34 am
Weird beliefs can be cured, but crappy leadership tends to become endemic. My advice is to just stop listening.
0 Replies
 
Tarantulas
 
  1  
Reply Thu 8 Apr, 2004 06:38 am
Titus wrote:
If the above quote from Setanta doesn't reek of partisanship, then I am a conservative -- not! LOL!!!

Whereas, I am an unabashed and unapologetic partisan (what you see with me is what you get -- take it or leave it), Setanta, pretends not to be which is completely disingenuous.

Believe it or not I agree with you.

* a giant earthquake shakes the nation and volcanos spring up everywhere *
0 Replies
 
blatham
 
  1  
Reply Thu 8 Apr, 2004 06:47 am
Tarantulas

That first piece is very good, and I thank you for posting it. Of course, one statistic he didn't mention, along with UFO belief, is the percentage of Americans who believe Jesus was the son of god and ate rice krispies for breakfast.

The second piece, from frontpage, is where you've gone wrong (along with newsmax).
0 Replies
 
Tarantulas
 
  1  
Reply Thu 8 Apr, 2004 07:57 am
blatham wrote:
The second piece, from frontpage, is where you've gone wrong (along with newsmax).

Oh? Where do you think that I went wrong?
0 Replies
 
blatham
 
  1  
Reply Thu 8 Apr, 2004 08:42 am
balance...multiplicity of viewpoint
0 Replies
 
Tarantulas
 
  1  
Reply Thu 8 Apr, 2004 11:26 am
Then feel free to cite an article if you wish. Or write something yourself. Add something to the discussion besides criticism.
0 Replies
 
Setanta
 
  1  
Reply Thu 8 Apr, 2004 11:36 am
Tarantulas wrote:
And we should probably thank Setanta for the predictable political rant without any concrete arguments to support it. Bringing emotion into a science discussion is like bringing a knife to a gunfight.


This is specious, and borders on ad hominem. The original piece has no political content, you just wished to skew the discussion in that direction. Titus then weighs in with an attack on Limbaugh. You then return with an attack on the scientists who have criticized the White House. An interesting article which was, in terms of politics, very innocuous, has been ruined as a topic of discussion, because you sought to politicize it, and got a knee-jerk response from Titus, generating your knee jerk. I am, in fact, familiar with this author, and greatly enjoy the web site of the sceptics organization. Too bad you can't see anything in life that isn't filtered through the dung-colored glasses of partisanship.
0 Replies
 
Setanta
 
  1  
Reply Thu 8 Apr, 2004 11:39 am
Titus wrote:
"...thanks to the current bunch of crooks and liars in chief...." Setanta

If the above quote from Setanta doesn't reek of partisanship, then I am a conservative -- not! LOL!!!

Whereas, I am an unabashed and unapologetic partisan (what you see with me is what you get -- take it or leave it), Setanta, pretends not to be which is completely disingenuous.
[/color]


This is also specious, and also borders on ad hominem. Take note that you had to go to another thread to quote me. I don't deny partisan attitudes and opinions on my part. My point, which both you and Taratalus are pointedly ignoring, is that the original article quoted has no political content, and this discussion is simply an exchange of partisan bashing which has no relevance to the contents of the original article.

Get a grip, Titus, i avoid your threads because of your obsessive partisanship, and am beginning to feel i ought to do the same with Tarantalus.
0 Replies
 
hobitbob
 
  1  
Reply Thu 8 Apr, 2004 11:42 am
Seconded.
0 Replies
 
 

Related Topics

Obama '08? - Discussion by sozobe
Let's get rid of the Electoral College - Discussion by Robert Gentel
McCain's VP: - Discussion by Cycloptichorn
Food Stamp Turkeys - Discussion by H2O MAN
The 2008 Democrat Convention - Discussion by Lash
McCain is blowing his election chances. - Discussion by McGentrix
Snowdon is a dummy - Discussion by cicerone imposter
TEA PARTY TO AMERICA: NOW WHAT?! - Discussion by farmerman
 
  1. Forums
  2. » Smart People Believe Weird Things
Copyright © 2024 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.03 seconds on 05/14/2024 at 01:13:50