@farmerman,
farmerman wrote:that's a silly point because youre making yourself the arbiter.
I was addressing what I (incorrectly)
believed Romeo's perspective to be.
farmerman wrote: If that is the case and its a true condition,
you have the duty to remove yourself fom that society (as defined by ntural law).
Really?? If u were born into pre-1914 Germany,
then after 1933, does natural law say that u must
evacuate,
whether u wanna or not, whether u own real estate there or not ??
I remain a little skeptical that natural law says that.
farmerman wrote:, back to my point (without weaseling please,
you have a duty to not be a burden upon your society).
WHAT is the source of that alleged "duty" ??
farmerman wrote: That's way, a correct society has a duty to assist you to NOT become a burden to it.
What is the source of that "duty"??
Who agreed to that "duty"??
Who decides whether a society is "correct" or not?? Is it Me??
IF, as u allege, a "correct society" has a duty
to assist u to NOT become a burden to it,
then that is an excuse for it to sneak in (
liberalism = sneaking in)
AUTHORITARIAN
interferences with liberty of the citizen.
Each citizen owes it to himself to
break society
and its low-life henchman, government, when it endeavors
to
USURP power, in violation of his freedom.
That is like fighting back against the schoolyard bully.
farmerman wrote:teach a man to fish", so to speak
David