10
   

Why are "facts" and "compromise" such threatening words to Republicans?

 
 
BigEgo
 
Reply Thu 29 Aug, 2013 09:15 am
Facts About Abortion The GOP Doesn’t Want You To Know
  • Topic Stats
  • Top Replies
  • Link to this Topic
Type: Discussion • Score: 10 • Views: 1,402 • Replies: 11
No top replies

 
Baldimo
 
  -2  
Reply Thu 29 Aug, 2013 10:57 am
@BigEgo,
What sort of compromise would be sought on the abortion debate? It seems to me that the left wants abortion available at all time for all women with no restrictions. So where is the middle ground?

0 Replies
 
Joe Nation
 
  1  
Reply Thu 29 Aug, 2013 12:11 pm
Quote:
It seems to me that the left wants abortion available at all time for all women with no restrictions.


You are so wrong about that supposed position, it defies description. What the pro-choice side has been saying since Roe v Wade and before, it that a woman and her doctor be able to make the intimate and personal decision as to whether to continue a pregnancy as a medical decision, as is her right, as is your right, to control what happens to our bodies and ourselves.
The pro-choice has ALWAYS agreed that there should be time limits and restrictions of various sorts, the kinds laid out in Roe v Wade, if you've ever read it.

It's a mistake to mis-state a position of those you oppose.

Joe(it makes you look devious)Nation
cicerone imposter
 
  1  
Reply Thu 29 Aug, 2013 12:20 pm
@BigEgo,
The facts about Roe v Wade (from Wiki).
Quote:
Roe v. Wade
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
(Redirected from Roe V. Wade)

U.S. Const. Amend. XIV; Tex. Code Crim. Proc. arts. 1191–94, 1196
Roe v. Wade, 410 U.S. 113 (1973), is a landmark decision by the United States Supreme Court on the issue of abortion. Decided simultaneously with a companion case, Doe v. Bolton, the Court ruled 7–2 that a right to privacy under the due process clause of the 14th Amendment extended to a woman's decision to have an abortion, but that right must be balanced against the state's two legitimate interests in regulating abortions: protecting prenatal life and protecting women's health. Arguing that these state interests became stronger over the course of a pregnancy, the Court resolved this balancing test by tying state regulation of abortion to the trimester of pregnancy.
The Court later rejected Roe's trimester framework, while affirming Roe's central holding that a person has a right to abortion until viability.[1] The Roe decision defined "viable" as being "potentially able to live outside the mother's womb, albeit with artificial aid", adding that viability "is usually placed at about seven months (28 weeks) but may occur earlier, even at 24 weeks."[2]
0 Replies
 
Baldimo
 
  -2  
Reply Thu 29 Aug, 2013 12:51 pm
@Joe Nation,
Did I say I oppose it? No I didn't. What I said might be an exaggeration but it isn't far off the mark. My only problem with abortion is when it is used like a regular form of birth control. "Oops I'm pregnant again, time for another abortion." That is my only negative take on abortion.

When states have passed restrictions on abortion even slight ones like no abortions after 20 weeks, the left goes ape **** and talks about a war on women and how they are trying to ban abortion. The 20 week limit could be seen as the viable point at which a baby can survive outside the womb with or without assistance from medical equipment.
RABEL222
 
  1  
Reply Thu 29 Aug, 2013 01:36 pm
@Baldimo,
Women arnt as stupid as you republicans thought they were. Most of them recognize BS when they see it.
Baldimo
 
  -2  
Reply Thu 29 Aug, 2013 01:38 pm
@RABEL222,
Sorry Rabel I'm not a republican. Gave up my registration when the social conservatives couldn't keep their mouths shut.

Care to explain what BS I have put forward, or is this just a drive-by insulting?
RABEL222
 
  1  
Reply Thu 29 Aug, 2013 02:07 pm
@Baldimo,
The fact you arnt registered dosent mean that you arnt spouting conservative BS. If it quacks like a duck-------.
Baldimo
 
  -2  
Reply Thu 29 Aug, 2013 02:08 pm
@RABEL222,
So you do avoid questions. What conservative BS and I spouting?
0 Replies
 
cicerone imposter
 
  1  
Reply Thu 29 Aug, 2013 02:39 pm
@RABEL222,
He not only quacks like a duck, but shits like one. Mr. Green

'......tiny bubbles....."
Baldimo
 
  -2  
Reply Thu 29 Aug, 2013 02:42 pm
@cicerone imposter,
You guys are funny. Picking on me for the effect of picking on me, but can't state what I said that was BS.

So if I am understanding this correctly. I either think exactly what you guys think or I'm full of ****?
BigEgo
 
  -1  
Reply Sun 8 Sep, 2013 12:39 pm
@Baldimo,
Baldimo wrote:

I'm full of ****.


I agree Laughing
0 Replies
 
 

Related Topics

Obama '08? - Discussion by sozobe
Let's get rid of the Electoral College - Discussion by Robert Gentel
McCain's VP: - Discussion by Cycloptichorn
Food Stamp Turkeys - Discussion by H2O MAN
The 2008 Democrat Convention - Discussion by Lash
McCain is blowing his election chances. - Discussion by McGentrix
Snowdon is a dummy - Discussion by cicerone imposter
GAFFNEY: Whose side is Obama on? - Discussion by gungasnake
 
  1. Forums
  2. » Why are "facts" and "compromise" such threatening words to Republicans?
Copyright © 2020 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.03 seconds on 08/11/2020 at 07:24:29