1
   

AMAZING! Bush: legal to lie to congress re Medicare costs

 
 
Reply Thu 1 Apr, 2004 05:45 pm
Posted on Thu, Apr. 01, 2004
Medicare officials say masking cost estimates was legal
By Tony Pugh
Knight Ridder Newspapers

WASHINGTON - Bush administration officials insisted Thursday that they acted legally in ordering the nation's top Medicare cost analyst to keep from lawmakers his estimate that the new Medicare prescription drug benefit might cost more than $100 billion over what Congress was willing to pay.

Former Medicare administrator Thomas Scully, now a health-care lobbyist, declined to appear before the House Ways and Means Committee to defend himself. But Scully, in written testimony, made a simple case:

Richard Foster, chief actuary at the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services, felt, according to Scully, that "he was free to make decisions about when or how to respond to congressional inquiries relating to cost estimates generally, and, in particular, the Medicare Reform bill."

"Simply put, I disagreed," Scully wrote, "and there is no question whatsoever that I made it very clear to Mr. Foster, both directly and indirectly, that I, as his supervisor, would decide when he would communicate with Congress."

Scully did not address Foster's assertion that he threatened to fire the actuary if Foster shared his data with lawmakers, which Knight Ridder irst reported on March 11. Foster's estimate, selectively shared with members of the Bush administration, indicated that the Medicare prescription drug benefit could cost over $500 billion in its first ten years, far above the $395 billion figure lawmakers were using.

If made public, the higher estimates would have jeopardized passage of the White House-backed prescription drug benefit, since 13 GOP House members had drawn the line at $400 billion. The bill initially passed the House by one vote. A House-Senate compromise later passed by five.

While Scully's gag order may have been legal, Democrats say it was unethical and forced them to vote on the measure without a full understanding of the bill and without a full debate on its merits.

Prior to Scully's arrival at Medicare in May 2001, Foster generally honored lawmakers' requests for his figures. Shortly before the first House vote on June 27, 2003, however, Scully ordered Foster to withhold his numbers.

Scully's top aide, Richard Flick, now the agency's San Francisco regional administrator, testified Thursday that he e-mailed Foster on June 20 on Scully's behalf. The e-mail states that Democratic requests for cost estimates should be shared "with Tom Scully only. NO ONE ELSE. ... the consequences for insubordination are extremely severe."

Flick said Scully ordered Foster to suppress the information, in part, because some of the data involved provisions that were no longer in the bill.

Leslie Norwalk, acting deputy Medicare administrator, testified that she'd told Foster on June 13 that he was not legally required to provide "internal Executive Branch information to Congress." Norwalk, an attorney, said lawyers in the Health and Human Services Department of which the Medicare agency is a part, agreed with her interpretation.

Ways and Means Committee Democrats disagree, but they're outnumbered. The committee's Republicans on Thursday tabled motions by Rep. Charles Rangel, D-NY, to subpoena for testimony Scully and White House health policy adviser Doug Badger, who had received Foster's estimates and may have shared them.

Committee chairman William Thomas, D-Calif, said that he would consider subpoenas if the committee were "in pursuit of a legal need." Thomas said he would not seek subpoenas to get information that members wanted only out of curiosity.

"There was a cover-up of this information and we want to know how high up the cover-up went," Rep. Sander Levin, D-Mich., blasted back.

In a related development, the General Accounting Office, Congress's investigative arm, will be looking into the matter, spokesman Jeff Nelligan said. Its probe will be conducted jointly with the Health and Human Services Department's Inspector General, the agency's independent investigators.
  • Topic Stats
  • Top Replies
  • Link to this Topic
Type: Discussion • Score: 1 • Views: 592 • Replies: 2
No top replies

 
BumbleBeeBoogie
 
  1  
Reply Thu 1 Apr, 2004 05:50 pm
0 Replies
 
BumbleBeeBoogie
 
  1  
Reply Sat 3 Apr, 2004 10:08 am
No-shows at hearing on Medicare costs stir fury
SEATTLE POST-INTELLIGENCER
http://seattlepi.nwsource.com/national/167448_medicare02.html

No-shows at hearing on Medicare costs stir fury
Key figures in debate over prescription drugs snub House

Friday, April 2, 2004
By SHERYL GAY STOLBERG
THE NEW YORK TIMES

WASHINGTON -- A senior White House official and the former Medicare administrator, central figures in a controversy over the cost of the new prescription drug law, declined to appear before a House committee yesterday, defying Democrats who had sought their testimony.

Citing executive privilege, the White House refused to send Doug Badger, the special assistant to the president for health policy, to testify before the House Ways and Means Committee. The former Medicare administrator, Thomas Scully, who no longer works for the government, wrote the committee a letter saying he had been busy traveling and would be unable to appear.

Democrats then tried to persuade the committee to subpoena them, but those motions failed along party lines, by votes of 23-16. When Rep. Lloyd Doggett, D-Texas, suggested that the panel invite Scully to appear on a more convenient date, the committee's chairman, Rep. Bill Thomas of California, dismissed the idea.

"The chair's reading of Mr. Scully's letter is, he ain't coming," Thomas declared.

The development infuriated Democrats, who are trying to investigate accusations by the chief Medicare actuary, Richard Foster, that Scully, as administrator, threatened to fire him if he shared his prescription-cost estimates with Congress last year, before the legislation was enacted. Foster has suggested that Scully was acting on orders from the White House, possibly from Badger.

Doggett called Badger "the Condoleezza Rice for health care." In refusing to send Badger, the administration invoked the same principle it had cited until Tuesday in refusing to send Rice to testify before the Sept. 11 commission: a "longstanding White House policy," in the words of Alberto Gonzales, the White House counsel, that aides who are exempt from Senate confirmation are also exempt from being required to testify before Congress, so that they may feel free to give the president unfettered advice.

Gonzales cited this principle in a letter to the Ways and Means Committee on Wednesday in which he said that on behalf of Badger, he would "respectfully decline the invitation."

As for Scully, he wrote the panel a two-page letter in which he said he dealt with Foster "openly and fairly during my entire tenure." He did not address the accusation that he had threatened to fire Foster, but he did say that when he was administrator, Foster was not free to communicate directly with lawmakers.

"There is no question whatsoever," he wrote, "that I made it very clear to Foster, both directly and indirectly, that I, as his supervisor, would decide when he would communicate with Congress."

Foster's figures are important because he calculated that the cost of the prescription drug bill would far exceed the $400 billion estimated by Congress. Had his calculations been widely known at the time the bill was considered last year, the measure might have failed, or been significantly altered.
0 Replies
 
 

Related Topics

Obama '08? - Discussion by sozobe
Let's get rid of the Electoral College - Discussion by Robert Gentel
McCain's VP: - Discussion by Cycloptichorn
Food Stamp Turkeys - Discussion by H2O MAN
The 2008 Democrat Convention - Discussion by Lash
McCain is blowing his election chances. - Discussion by McGentrix
Snowdon is a dummy - Discussion by cicerone imposter
TEA PARTY TO AMERICA: NOW WHAT?! - Discussion by farmerman
 
  1. Forums
  2. » AMAZING! Bush: legal to lie to congress re Medicare costs
Copyright © 2024 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.03 seconds on 09/29/2024 at 08:19:28