@mark noble,
mark noble wrote:If the Earth wasn't there, the moon would not have an object to revolve around.
Rotation isn't relative to objects, rotation is relative to points. Sometimes there are objects where the points are, sometimes there aren't. It doesn't affect the nature of the motion.
mark noble wrote:Have you bothered to draw a line through the moon yet, or are you just going headlong into convincing me I'm ignorant on merit's sake?
Neither. I haven't bothered to draw that line because it's irrelevant. And while it happens to be true that you're ignorant of the relevant physics, I'm not all that interested in pointing it out. It's not personal, it's business. My business is to point out the relevant arguments and the valid conclusions to anyone who will listen to them. Whether that includes you is your choice.
mark noble wrote:If the moon was a big bus, Driver facing Earth, ALWAYS, at what point does that bus revolve around ITSELF?..........
Always. The Bus's would
always rotate around the Earth and itself.
mark noble wrote:It is like my fist, at the end of my arm
It
is like that. If you sit on a carousel and stretch out your fist inward, towards the axis of the carousel, your fist will rotate around the center of the carousel,
and itself --- at the same angular speed.
mark noble wrote:(Hand is FIXED at wrist) - It cannot rotate, in and of itself, else it falls off.
It
can rotate if the force rotating it exceeds the force attaching it to your arm. While that's certainly unpleasant, it's perfectly possible.