@glitterbag,
BillRM wrote:
Quote:Bill, u bring out a very good point.
Firefly, what woud u have said
if those same pictures had been on Zimmy 's fone?????????
Can you just see Firefly postings if anyone had found text messages
by Zimmerman bragging how he enjoying fighting of the same nature
that Trayvon had written/text?????!!!!!?????
glitterbag wrote:It's interesting, BillRM is consistent in his happy patter of bullshit.
He always strikes me as a weak individual frightened by his own shadow.
I disagree. He fights me whenever we differ in vu.
I 've not known him to back down from his beliefs.
glitterbag wrote:He stalks firefly. If you see firefly, Bill is hot on her heels.
I believe that it is
reciprocal.
She tends to answer more of Bill's posts than mine.
I think he put her on Ignore for a while.
I dunno if he still has her on Ignore or not.
glitterbag wrote:I don't even have to wonder why that happens.
But, David,,,,,for years you have insisted
on your own phonetic spelling, not caring if you were unintelligible.
No. I cared. I was sure that my posts were legible and ez enuf to read.
The whole idea of fonetic spelling is to be
EASIER
than the old, inefficient way, toward whose abandonment
I have endeavored to lead by example.
glitterbag wrote:The crazy colors and awkward fonts, bold face,
all just seem as the actions of a non-conformist.
Yes. I 'm a freedom-lover.
I have used distinctions of
color, font
size and bold
for EMFASIS.
Conformity does not necessarily mean much to me.
glitterbag wrote:But, I am truly shocked at your genial rascist comments.
Statements such as "the blacks", "the whites", frankly I'm disappointed.
Those are merely identifications, not comments.
I fail to see a reason for disappointment.
I dont choose to get into a conflict qua racist v. anti-racist,
tho I
WILL declare that the whites and the blacks have an equal right to defend themselves.
The significance of this event bore upon
the legitimacy of self defense, regardless of race.
glitterbag wrote:Would you describe yourself as ' a white'???
Sure, Y not???
Yes, genetically, but the sun gets me too dark; I
dislike it.
I try to stay out of the sun, or wear wide brimmed hats.
glitterbag wrote:Can you not see how dehumanizing this is?
Yes, I
CANNOT see that it is "dehumanizing" in any measure.
I feel
equally as human as b4.
glitterbag wrote:You've always been somewhat of a strange bird,
but you give issues some thought. I don't think you are like some of
these morons who have to repackage 'evidence' to make the murdered
teen seem more despicable.
I take exception to your characterization, qua any murder.
The jury verdict was correct.
glitterbag wrote:But back to a point I made earlier, you old men may have chosen to
forget what it was like to be 15, 16, 17 because you have sanitized
your personal memories.
I remember my 3rd Birthday party
and I remember events leading up to it.
glitterbag wrote:If any of you still have mothers alive, I'm betting
the ranch their memories of you as a teen are more in focus.
I have some older cousins.
Our memories
co-incide among ourselves;
(I was a bookish kinda guy) but u can still
keep the ranch.
glitterbag wrote:Those of us who have given birth to boys and girls have had to watch
carefully to assure those children make it to adulthood, and free from
predators like Zimmerman.[????] Men who believe they can tell
by looking that a young man doesn't deserve to live, or even
live long enough to tell his side of the story.
That is not what happened.
I will not recapitulate the time-line. I 'm sure u already know.
glitterbag wrote:Big strong authority figures who can pick out those troublesome women
with opinions, opinions that might threaten their whole big macho myth of manhood.
I don t have such a myth.
I m lucky that I can walk at all.
Its fun to play with opinions.
David