@hawkeye10,
Quote: weakly, because the state arrested Zimmerman on the basis of the story that the Marin lead mob was selling, that Martin was killed in a fit of racism
Come on, Hawkeye. You know that isn't true.
The Chief Police Investigator wanted to arrest and charge Zimmerman the night of the shooting because his story was "unconvincing"--not because of anything relating to race. The D.A. passed on doing that, and that's what led Martin's parents to demand accountability for the questionable circumstances of their son's death. And their anger was at the D.A., for not arresting their son's shooter and holding him accountable for their son's death. It was a cry for justice on their part--they felt it was the D.A. who treated their son's death as unimportant because he was a young male black victim. Their complaint was with the D.A.
It was Martin's parents who started all the noise and all the protests, and they weren't selling any story that their son was killed in "a fit of racism"--they thought he had been wrongly racially profiled and that had led to his questionable death. And all they wanted, when they started their protests, and they asked Sharpton to assist them in organizing them and getting media attention for them, was for the D.A. to reopen the case and arrest Zimmerman. And, those peaceful protests achieved their aim.
The governor, quite appropriately, agreed there was legal merit to these demonstrations, and so he appointed a special prosecutor, and she felt there was reason to arrest Zimmerman--again based on his "unconvincing " story of self defense. Zimmerman's story was inconsistent, contradictory, and seemed "embellished". That's what made him, and his credibility suspect--he killed an unarmed kid, and his self-defense story was "unconvincing"
I'm really surprised that you, of all people, would fall for the right-wing gun nut version of what happened. That version ignores all the evidence that points to Zimmerman's apparent lies--the valid reasons he should have been arrested the night of the shooting, and, had that occurred, none of those demonstrations would have been necessary.
There is not the slightest doubt in my mind that, if one of your children was killed under similarly questionable circumstances, and the shooter was not arrested, despite his "unconvincing" story, and the recommendation of the police investigator that he should have been arrested and charged the night of the shooting, that, just like Martin's parents, you would have carried on to beat the band. You'd be carrying on about a "dysfunctional government" that was so incompetent it didn't care about your unarmed child winding up dead at the hands of a shooter with a questionable and unconvincing story of self-defense--you'd be screaming for the man's arrest, and you'd be blasting the government, and you'd be calling for protests.
I really do think you'd react just the way Martin's parents did.