The State of Florida vs George Zimmerman: The Trial

@BillRM,

If Zimmerman was interested in protecting his life, he should have remained in his car.

A jury also found O.J. not guilty. That didn't mean he was "innocent" either.

1 Reply

@BillRM,

http://www.crowdfundingguide.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/08/head-up-ass.jpg

0 Replies

@cicerone imposter,

Quote:

They all jump to conclusions - based on their own wishful thinking...

That's why BillRM thinks Zimmerman's wife and girfriend are trying to "put a knife in his back". That's how he views most women. That's his wishful thinking about women. He neither likes nor trusts women.

He sees women as "attacking" Zimmerman, he's sure Trayvon Martin "attacked" Zimmerman, but he never stops to consider what Zimmerman might do to provoke all these alleged "attacks"? But BillRM is rather dumb and dense, he can't understand why people "attack" him either, or what he does to provoke it, and how he turns himself into an object of ridicule.

Do you think BillRM understands why Robert Gentel called him A2K's "Village Idiot"?

0 Replies

HA HA HA HA, live with it you bleeding-heart lefty pinkos.. Smile

http://i53.photobucket.com/albums/g64/PoorOldSpike/zim-not-guilty_zpsde3badb8.jpg~original

2 Replies

@Romeo Fabulini,

ha ha ha ha.... "Not guilty" doesn't mean he's innocent. ha ha ha ha ha .....

Do you think OJ Simpson was innocent? ha ha ha ha ......

0 Replies

@cicerone imposter,

Quote:

Self defense with a gun is not self-defense; it's murder. Self defense is when one is attacked physically,

This is how Pa has added its "spin" onto its own version of Stand Yer Ground. Gun with a gun.

2 Replies

@farmerman,

Shaking my head at such nonsense that the victim should be limited to using the same means as his attacker for self defense.

Brain dead come to mind.

1 Reply

@BillRM,

Then it was right for Trayon to use the sidewalk, his can of iced tea, his teeth, his hands, whatever he could, to protect himself from this creepy guy who had stalked him in the dark, never identified himself, and probably reached for his gun when he confronted Martin.

Unfortunately, he was able to land only a single punch.

This is how BillRM sees self defense, and what he thinks should be legal Laughing

http://blogs.denverpost.com/opinion/files/2013/07/zimmerman-verdict-cartoon-morin-495x351.jpg

1 Reply

@OmSigDAVID,

Your ignorant statement,

Quote:

I take it that u are announcing
to the world that u are a COWARD, C. I., too afraid to defend yourself.

That's because you know absolutely nothing about me. Even today at 78 years old, I'm not afraid of much - especially bullies like you who are usually all talk and no action.

All you can do is talk with your penis (gun) and not much else!

What's the matter, David? My challenge about your non-skills as an attorney getting to you? Mr. Green

2 Replies

@cicerone imposter,

cicerone imposter wrote:

Your ignorant statement,

DAVID wrote:

I take it that u are announcing
to the world that u are a COWARD, C. I., too afraid to defend yourself.

cicerone imposter wrote:

That's because you know absolutely nothing about me.

That 's true. I am IGNORANT of u.

If u were attacked un-expectedly, as Zimmy was,
then what woud u DO ??

cicerone imposter wrote:

Even today at 78 years old, I'm not afraid of much - especially bullies like you

I am not a bully. I have never been a bully.
I reject that slanderous characterization.

cicerone imposter wrote:

who are usually all talk and no action.

What action do u have in mind?? This is an all talk forum.

cicerone imposter wrote:

All you can do is talk with your penis (gun) and not much else!

Please control your homosexual fantasies
and please keep me out of them. Thank u.

cicerone imposter wrote:

What's the matter, David? My challenge about your non-skills as an attorney getting to you?

???

2 Replies

@firefly,

firefly wrote:

If Zimmerman was interested in protecting his life,
he should have remained in his car.

He was looking for a specific
location to tell 911 operator exactly where tell police to go
because when he previously told him "the Clubhouse" the 911 guy
was not satisfied with that. He was attacked while looking for that information.

He was not in fear of his life; he was in quest of his location.

David

1 Reply

@cicerone imposter,

CI, say goodnight. Dave is making a fool out of you.

I don't often agree with Dave, but he is right on in this issue.

1 Reply

@Advocate,

Says you; but the majority of people who provide sources are the ones who are providing the facts and evidence. You're only pissed off, because we all pick on your position on Israel's apartheid.

You're a loser in more ways than one. This adds to your list of lost cause.

0 Replies

@OmSigDAVID,

David,

Quote:

If u were attacked un-expectedly, as Zimmy was,
then what woud u DO ??

"Zimmy" was the one in pursuit of Trayvon. You don't even know how this event took place - after all the coverage of this case. That's a clue as to what kind of attorney you used to be; stupid - and that has followed you here to a2k.

1 Reply

@OmSigDAVID,

He was told by the police dispatcher; "you don't need to do that."

In other words, quit following him. Simple English instruction to a deranged man with a gun - in pursuit of trouble.

BTW, I'm not a homosexual, and I'm not a homophobe like you!

2 Replies

@farmerman,

Quote:

Self defense with a gun is not self-defense; it's murder.
Self defense is when one is attacked physically,

farmerman wrote:

This is how Pa has added its "spin" onto its own version of Stand Yer Ground. Gun with a gun.

Has the statute been amended in Pa, farmer?
A quick Google yielded that as of July 2013:

Under the new law,
a person in any lawful place outside his home
“has no duty to retreat and has the right to stand his ground and
use force, including deadly force if . . . (he) believes it is
immediately necessary to do so to protect himself against death,
serious bodily injury, kidnapping, or sexual intercourse by force or threat.”
(18 PA consolidated statutes 505(b)(2.3)).

0 Replies

@firefly,

firefly wrote:

Then it was right for Trayon to use the sidewalk, his can of iced tea, his teeth, his hands, whatever he could, to protect himself from this creepy guy who had stalked him in the dark, never identified himself,

There is NOTHING improper about stalking anyone.
If the street thug wanted Zimmy to id. himself,
then he shud have asked Zimmy instead of violently attacking him.

David

1 Reply

@cicerone imposter,

cicerone imposter wrote:

David,
Quote:
If u were attacked un-expectedly, as Zimmy was,
then what woud u DO ??

"Zimmy" was the one in pursuit of Trayvon. You don't even know how this event took place - after all the coverage of this case. That's a clue as to what kind of attorney you used to be; stupid - and that has followed you here to a2k.

OK, let 's lay all that aside for the moment.

If u were attacked in a public street,
being beaten and your head slammed on the cement, what woud u DO ?

0 Replies

@OmSigDAVID,

"Zimmy" is the thug, and the coward seems to prefer women, children, and older men as his targets.

1 Reply

@firefly,

David is of the same mindset; a coward who prefers to pick on children and women. He supports like-minded aggressive monsters like Zimmy; brothers under the skin.

2 Replies

The State of Florida vs George Zimmerman: The Trial

Related Topics

Quick Links

My Account

able2know