@firefly,
DAVID wrote:He knew that the police were on their way, because he called them.
firefly wrote:Which is why Zimmerman shouldn't have followed Martin.
He should have left police work to the police.
That is a
non-sequitur; he was trying to help the police
to find the suspect 's location. He was helpful.
firefly wrote:Look, even Zimmerman's current attorney has called him a "wannabe cop"
who should not have been carrying a gun that night.
We are not bound by that lawyer 's opinions,
tho maybe Zimmy needs better or more loyal legal representation.
That lawyer is not the repository of
TRUTH.
firefly wrote:The entire confrontation, and shooting, would have been avoided that night,
had Zimmerman not followed Martin.
Then, for that matter, it 'd have been avoided if martin
had stayed home that nite.
Martin had
EXACTLY the
same amount of right to go to the store that nite,
as Zimmy had and he still has to follow people in public.
Following people is a
PERFECTLY LAWFUL use of the public streets.
If u dispute that, then please
cite us to the law against it,
instead of
obliquely implying that there was something improper about it.
firefly wrote:And that was also the conclusion the police arrived at.
Undoubtedly, the police have all different opinions about it.
firefly wrote:The entire incident was avoidable.
Yes, if martin had refrained from beating Zimmy 's head upon the street.
All martin had to do was be nice.
I did that in NY, when confronted and it worked
PERFECTLY!
firefly wrote:It was Zimmerman who initiated and provoked it.
He has our thanks for his civic-minded initiatives, including following suspected burglars.
Knowing that the arrival of the police was very imminent,
Zimmy was not going to commit a
bloody violent felony,
possibly right in front of them (depending on how far thay were),
nor commit a violent felony right out in front of all the nabors thereabout,
as he was yelling for help. He lawfully defended himself. He defended all of the nabors.
David