27
   

The State of Florida vs George Zimmerman: The Trial

 
 
OmSigDAVID
 
  1  
Wed 3 Jul, 2013 02:19 pm
@cicerone imposter,
cicerone imposter wrote:
It's not based on "race."
If the race roles were REVERSED,
then u 'd be demanding acquittal, every bit as loud.




cicerone imposter wrote:
All of you are stupid and unreliable spokesman for the events that transpired;
you're not a witness in the trial; you were NOT THERE.
The intellects of posters
to this thread r OFF-TOPIC.
cicerone imposter
 
  1  
Wed 3 Jul, 2013 02:31 pm
@OmSigDAVID,
They are not "reversed." It is what it is. Quit imagining what it might have been; your imagination doesn't count.
firefly
 
  1  
Wed 3 Jul, 2013 02:38 pm
@Thomas,
Quote:
. By the way, I have to vent my frustration about the cable TV networks, all of whom cut to commercial precisely when the witness discusses the results he got and the meaning of his numbers.

They make sure you'll stay tuned through the commercial by doing that. Laughing

I suspect the commercial breaks are pre-set, and they'll cut away regardless of what's going on with the trial when that break comes up.

But I can't complain too much about HLN, they just pause what's going on in the courtroom and pick it right up again after the break.

0 Replies
 
OmSigDAVID
 
  1  
Wed 3 Jul, 2013 02:39 pm
@cicerone imposter,
No. I need not "quit".
I remain free to post whatever I want on the topic.
firefly
 
  2  
Wed 3 Jul, 2013 02:41 pm
@OmSigDAVID,
Quote:
I remain free to post whatever I want on the topic

The topic of this thread is the trial, David.

You seem to be commenting on everything but the actual trial.
OmSigDAVID
 
  0  
Wed 3 Jul, 2013 02:44 pm
@firefly,
DAVID wrote:
I remain free to post whatever I want on the topic
firefly wrote:
The topic of this thread is the trial, David.

You seem to be commenting on everything but the actual trial.
No. I argue that the trial has resulted
from naked anti-white emotional racial prejudice.
hawkeye10
 
  1  
Wed 3 Jul, 2013 03:02 pm
@OmSigDAVID,
zimmerman is not white...this is about a pro black bias, blacks are if course some of our fav victims. we will always bend over backwards to make a black
person a victim, and as we see here neither the law nor the facts will be allowed to get in the way of our mission to make victims.
cicerone imposter
 
  1  
Wed 3 Jul, 2013 03:06 pm
@hawkeye10,
Poor David charges racial prejudice - like everything else he's claimed about this trial, but can't prove any of it!

Poor David doesn't understand that the trial will determine Zimmerman's innocence or guilt, and what he has said about this trial were all invented in his own dead brain that has no relationship to what's happened.

JTT
 
  1  
Wed 3 Jul, 2013 03:11 pm
@hawkeye10,
Quote:
this is about a pro black bias, blacks are if course some of our fav victims. we will always bend over backwards to make a black
person a victim, and as we see here neither the law nor the facts will be allowed to get in the way of our mission to make victims.


Not that's reality based.
0 Replies
 
hawkeye10
 
  -2  
Wed 3 Jul, 2013 03:12 pm
@cicerone imposter,
the paint is almost dry, we are watching the abuse of a man named Zimmerman at the hands of the state. all we are awaiting for now is how bad the abuse will be. justice would have been no charge. the backstop.should have been the judge throwing the charge out for lack of evidence.
revelette
 
  2  
Wed 3 Jul, 2013 03:22 pm
The defense sure is putting on a pretty desperate, pathetic attempt to discredit the DNA evidence.

If the standards were not so high, Zimmerman should definitely should be found guilty, but since all this basically is coming to down to a basically "he said" only, and only one juror has to find he had a reasonable fear or just is basically biased to begin with, I have my doubts.
JTT
 
  1  
Wed 3 Jul, 2013 03:23 pm
@hawkeye10,
Quote:
the paint is almost dry, we are watching the abuse of a man named Zimmerman at the hands of the state. all we are awaiting for now is how bad the abuse will be. justice would have been no charge. the backstop.should have been the judge throwing the charge out for lack of evidence.


Aaaaaaah, you poor poor dears.

"we are watching the abuse of a man named Zimmerman at the hands of the state"

Can you not fathom what mealy mouthed hypocrites you are, Hawkeye?

0 Replies
 
cicerone imposter
 
  1  
Wed 3 Jul, 2013 03:24 pm
@revelette,
What one or more jurors see is very important to their final decision on innocence or guilt.

Even during our trial, we had two jurors who claimed that without the DNA proof, his guilt was not proven. We also learned that nobody knows how long sperm will live in a dead body. We had other circumstantial evidence that proved his guilt, but they didn't believe in them. After a full day of going over all the evidence, they finally agreed with the majority.
BillW
 
  2  
Wed 3 Jul, 2013 03:33 pm
@cicerone imposter,
Well, we didn't hear today - "The Prosecution Rests"! The Defense wanted to have Friday off, but the Judge reminded them the Jury is sequestered. They're just goofballs.

For me, Murder 2 is back on the table - Zimmerman knew the police would be there is very few minutes, he wanted Trayvon dead, why - to show he would make a great cop. OMG, never, why - cause he had a depraved mind, delusions of grandeur........
roger
 
  1  
Wed 3 Jul, 2013 03:43 pm
@BillW,
If he were charged with being a jerk, or dorkish behaviour, they would have to convict. I've no idea what happened from the moment of confrontation and onwards. Naturely, I can invent several scenarios, each as plausible as the other.
0 Replies
 
OmSigDAVID
 
  0  
Wed 3 Jul, 2013 04:27 pm
@hawkeye10,
hawkeye10 wrote:
zimmerman is not white...
The media and other supporters of conviction
treat him as being a white; thay deem him to be a white,
regardless of his ancestry. It 'd be very different
if 2 whites or 2 blacks had the same confrontation.



hawkeye10 wrote:
this is about a pro black bias,
Yes.
0 Replies
 
OmSigDAVID
 
  0  
Wed 3 Jul, 2013 04:33 pm
@cicerone imposter,
cicerone imposter wrote:
Poor David charges racial prejudice -
I am neither poor,
nor am I any victim.
I am in pretty good circumstances.
Presumably, Zimmy will not be poor either
when his book and his movie come out.




cicerone imposter wrote:
like everything else he's claimed about this trial, but can't prove any of it!
Its a little sad that your mind is so far gone
that u believe that I must prove ANYTHING.
If I do, I get nothing for it.
If I don't, I lose nothing.





David

cicerone imposter
 
  2  
Wed 3 Jul, 2013 04:34 pm
@OmSigDAVID,
Circular, and not relevant.
RABEL222
 
  2  
Wed 3 Jul, 2013 04:38 pm
@OmSigDAVID,
Wish you would post facts rather than BS.
cicerone imposter
 
  2  
Wed 3 Jul, 2013 04:42 pm
@RABEL222,
David is not capable of stating facts; he loves to use his own imagination to arrive at stupid conclusions. HE WAS NOT A WITNESS TO ANY OF THE ACTIVITIES OF ZIMMERMAN OR MARTIN, before, during or after Zimmerman shot Martin.
0 Replies
 
 

Related Topics

 
Copyright © 2025 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.06 seconds on 03/06/2025 at 06:44:50