@firefly,
firefly wrote:Walking around, talking on a cell phone, is just that.
It is not "pre-burglary casing houses".
Talking on a fone is no excuse for casing the naborhood for burglary.
firefly wrote:Zimmerman saw a young black male, doing absolutely nothing wrong,
Preparing for burglary is rong.
firefly wrote:in a place he had a right to be, and he misinterpreted the male's behavior
What leads u to believe that there was any
misinterpretation???
Is it that he had not completed his burglaries yet??
firefly wrote:because of his skin color--he racially profiled him,
OK; nothing rong with that.
He did not
CONVICT him; he only followed
to see him.
That is perfectly legal and moral.
firefly wrote:and he completely disregarded Neighborhood Watch rules
by both pursuing him, and by doing so when armed.
So what??
Do u allege that he had a legal or moral duty to obay that club??
I doubt that he did.
If u can point to a rule of law that says he must do so,
then will u reveal it to us, if u dont mind???
firefly wrote:Zimmerman recklessly stalked
The stalking was not "reckless".
firefly wrote:and killed an innocent house guest
He was not "innocent"; he was a
bloodthirsty murderer wannabe.
firefly wrote:in that community he was allegedly "protecting".
Trayvon Martin was a victim of George Zimmerman's personal obsessions,
poor judgment and impaired impulse control.
You don't protect a community by killing innocent children who are staying there.
U protect it
VERY WELL indeed by killing a homicidal maniac that has snuck in there.
After Zimmy, Mr. t will not pound anyone else 's head on the street.