The State of Florida vs George Zimmerman: The Trial

Quote:

That was raving, Bill. You can do better.

Once more do you prefer that the world war two vet die under the fists of the teenagers then that he would had pull out a gun and kills those teenagers in self defense?

A simple question that you should have no problem in answering one way or another.

Maybe, Bill has a medical degree that we don't know about,
and he's able to diagnose people through his tv screen. LOL

Some people don't know the difference between something verbalized at trial doesn't equate to evidence.

First give us yours. Your the one saying George had trumatic injuries. Whats your medical background. And knowing how to fire a weapon dosent count as medical.

I answered it.

And you were raving...although perhaps you cannot do better.

When were Sharpton and Jackson on the jury?

Quote:

I answered it.

And you were raving...although perhaps you cannot do better.

So Frank the WW2 vet have the right to used deadly force against not one but two teenagers attacking him therefore there is nothing wrong with Zimmerman doing the same against one teenager who did attacked him also?

An if not why is one life threatening attack in any way difference from the other life threatening attack?

Quote:

When were Sharpton and Jackson on the jury?

Are you on drugs as your postings as above made zero sense.

And we all know that Zimmerman started the incident by insisting that a young man walking down a street looked like a threat

Let me ask you again. Where did the jury make a factual finding that Zimmerman acted in self defense?

Quote:

And we all know that Zimmerman started the incident by insisting that a young man walking down a street looked like a threat

Trying to pin you down is fun...

...so it is your position that someone following you on the public streets would grant you the right to launch a deadly attack on the person following you?

An at the same time take away the right of the person you are attacking right to defend himself?

Is that your position??????????????

If Zimmerman actions was in anyway illegal before the Trayvon attack you would be right under the self defense laws however as his actions was not illegal that does not apply.

You do not lose the right of self defense by doing something that annoyed your attacker unless it was illegal.

By the way do you think that when a young woman got into my face and threaten to killed me in fact follow me home and killed me would that by itself allowed me to attack her?

Hint the answer is no as in hell no just as Trayvon had zero right to launch an attacked on Zimmerman for following him.

don't know that I would think it right to launch a deadly attack on that person...but I sure as hell would confront him. Which is what I think Trayvon Martin did. Perhaps Zimmerman gave him some lip...and maybe even pushed him...and maybe Trayvon reacted to the push...and the confrontation became physical.

I don't know that I would think it right to launch a deadly attack on that person...but I sure as hell would confront him. Which is what I think Trayvon Martin did. Perhaps Zimmerman gave him some lip...and maybe even pushed him...and maybe Trayvon reacted to the push...and the confrontation became physical. But still, in my mind, FAR FROM deadly. We really do not know, because at the end of the confrontation...Trayvon was dead.

Quote:

don't know that I would think it right to launch a deadly attack on that person...but I sure as hell would confront him. Which is what I think Trayvon Martin did. Perhaps Zimmerman gave him some lip...and maybe even pushed him...and maybe Trayvon reacted to the push...and the confrontation became physical.

Well you might not know but I know that it is not right to launch an attack because someone had annoyed you either legally or morally right.

Second, there is zero and I mean zero evidence of any of the above story line of your happening and dreaming up some possible situations where it might had been Zimmerman fault is not good enough to even charge him let alone try him let alone after a not guilt verdict keep attacking Zimmerman for defensing himself.

Oh, I might had also talk to Zimmerman but I would had done so in a friendly way that no conflicted would had resulted. Love you using the word confront Zimmerman instead of just talking to him it tell me your mind set in dealing with another person on the streets.

When being challenge in my past such as when I was working for the 2010 census I had no hard feeling toward the person challenging me and those challenges went beyond just following me.

Footnote there were a very small percent of the population that was very very unfriendly to censors takers and yet I did not get into any conflict with such people.

Frank Apisa wrote:

I don't know that I would think it right to launch a deadly attack on that person...but I sure as hell would confront him. Which is what I think Trayvon Martin did. Perhaps Zimmerman gave him some lip...and maybe even pushed him...and maybe Trayvon reacted to the push...and the confrontation became physical. But still, in my mind, FAR FROM deadly. We really do not know, because at the end of the confrontation...Trayvon was dead.

R u sure that u 've got enuf "maybe"s there with the "perhaps", Frank; I dunno.

I know that when I was confronted for stalking some commercial establishments in NY last week,
it was very pleasant, and no one came even close to getting his head pounded against anything.

When I lived in NY, I ofen went for walks at nite.
Sometimes, coming home therefrom, I wondered whether someone
was following me (for mugging) or not. There was never any un-pleasantness.

I have ofen posted that if travon had chosen to be CIVIL,
then he 'd be intact.





David

I don't know that I would think it right to launch a deadly attack on that person...but I sure as hell would confront him. Which is what I think Trayvon Martin did. Perhaps Zimmerman gave him some lip...and maybe even pushed him...and maybe Trayvon reacted to the push...and the confrontation became physical. But still,




in my mind, FAR FROM deadly .

We really do not know, because at the end of the confrontation...Trayvon was dead.

Trayvon Martin is dead...at 17.
He made the mistake of walking where George Zimmerman was "on patrol."