The State of Florida vs George Zimmerman: The Trial

@revelette,

All true. I would be interested in a hypothetical jury's findings if Martin had been on trial. He might have been, if he had survived.

0 Replies

@parados,

Have you noticed that the gun nut heros have condemned a black teenager who got into a little trouble in high school but was never charged with a crime useing innuendo and outright lies to condemn him because he committed the crime of getting shot by a man who has been in trouble most of his life and has been charged with crimes and been convicted of said crimes. No wonder the U S of A is on the way down with these kinds of mentality.

2 Replies

@BillRM,

BillRM wrote:

Keep trying to falsely claimed that the jury did not find he acted in legal self defense.

I'm not the one making false claims here Bill.
The jury didn't find he acted in self defense. It only found that couldn't reasonably find him guilty of manslaughter or murder under the instructions they were given. That doesn't mean he acted in self defense or even that the jury thought he acted in self defense. It only means they had reasonable doubts about the case of the prosecution under their instructions.

On they form the jury filled out it only states:
"We the jury find the defendant not guilty."

It states nothing about the reasons for find that person not guilty.

2 Replies

@RABEL222,

RABEL222 wrote:

Have you noticed that the gun nut heros have condemned a black teenager who got into a little trouble in high school but was never charged with a crime useing innuendo and outright lies to condemn him because he committed the crime of getting shot by a man who has been in trouble most of his life and has been charged with crimes and been convicted of said crimes. No wonder the U S of A is on the way down with these kinds of mentality.

Right on the button.

0 Replies

@parados,

parados wrote:

BillRM wrote:

Keep trying to falsely claimed that the jury did not find he acted in legal self defense.

I'm not the one making false claims here Bill.
The jury didn't find he acted in self defense. It only found that couldn't reasonably find him guilty of manslaughter or murder under the instructions they were given. That doesn't mean he acted in self defense or even that the jury thought he acted in self defense. It only means they had reasonable doubts about the case of the prosecution under their instructions.

Right.

But these guys have to make Trayvon seem like a delinquent...so that a gun carrier had every right to shoot him through the chest.

They should be ashamed of themselves...but they haven't got it in them!

2 Replies

@Frank Apisa,

Quote:

WDYGFY...ADIWAA.

Damn it Frank. I am not into this crap. I can just barely express myself in 2 an 3 letter words.

0 Replies

@parados,

You're attempting to discuss this subject with an ignoramus that doesn't still understand what happened during the trial, and why Zimmerman was found not guilty.

As one member of the jury said, Zimmerman got away with murder.

Bill can't possibly understand the reasons why Zimmerman got away with murder.

2 Replies

@BillRM,

I'm not defending TM Bill. I don't know anything about him except that he was shot to death by GZ.

What was the jewelry? Was it diamonds and gold or bling.

0 Replies

@parados,

parados wrote:

Gosh.. and the 88 year old vet would have been charged with a crime if the kids hadn't killed him.

WHICH crime, Mr. Parados ?

1 Reply

@RABEL222,

No crime just an assault on Zimmerman for annoying him for being follow.

0 Replies

@Frank Apisa,

Quote:

But these guys have to make Trayvon seem like a delinquent...so that a gun carrier had every right to shoot him through the chest.

Zimmerman sure the hell have a right to shot Trayvon and a jury agree with that opinion and I would have done the same damn thing under the same conditions of being pin under this delinquent and getting the **** beaten out of me.

With no way to know if the attack would end up with me being in an ICU or a grave.

1 Reply

@cicerone imposter,

Quote:

Bill can't possibly understand the reasons why Zimmerman got away with murder.

S*E*L*F ......... D*E*F*E*N*S*E

1 Reply

@cicerone imposter,

cicerone imposter wrote:

I just wonder how much support Zimmerman would get from the same people defending him
if their own son got killed by Zimmerman in the same way?

If I had a son who beat someone 's head on the street
for something so INNOCENT as following him,
then I 'd agree that my son DESERVED to get shot for that.
If I did that, then I 'd deserve it, too.

cicerone imposter wrote:

Walking home from the store.

(while he cases the naborhood)
That was not relevant; what was dispositive
was his beating Zimmy 's head on the cement, to make his brain fall out.

4 Replies

@OmSigDAVID,

You don't have a son David. That's a whole emotional area you've not encountered. If you were honest you'd have to say you don't know what you'd do.

1 Reply

@Frank Apisa,

Frank Apisa wrote:

parados wrote:

BillRM wrote:

Keep trying to falsely claimed that the jury did not find he acted in legal self defense.

I'm not the one making false claims here Bill.
The jury didn't find he acted in self defense. It only found that couldn't reasonably find him guilty of manslaughter or murder under the instructions they were given. That doesn't mean he acted in self defense or even that the jury thought he acted in self defense. It only means they had reasonable doubts about the case of the prosecution under their instructions.

Right.

But these guys have to make Trayvon seem like a delinquent...so that a gun carrier had every right to shoot him through the chest.

They should be ashamed of themselves...but they haven't got it in them!

What COUNTS is that travon was guilty of attempted murder,
for NO reason, by beating the victim 's head on the street,
not how saintly nor delinquent he had been, in the past.

Zimmy has the same right of self defense against ANYONE.

David

0 Replies

@OmSigDAVID,

Can not get over the idea that some people here think that Zimmerman should had allowed himself to be either beaten to death or into an ICU instead of firing one bullet into Trayvon.

In fact all self defense training informed you that if you do need to fired you should at least fired two times not one.

An if it had been me Trayvon would had have two not one bullet hole in his body.

0 Replies

@cicerone imposter,

cicerone imposter wrote:

You're attempting to discuss this subject with an ignoramus that doesn't still understand what happened during the trial, and why Zimmerman was found not guilty.

As one member of the jury said, Zimmerman got away with murder.

O, yea, that 's Y she voted to ACQUIT along with 1OO% of the other jurors.

David

0 Replies

@OmSigDAVID,

When I travel (which is frequently), I "case" all manners of neighborhoods by walking. I like to look at buildings (architecture), the people, and how they live. That's whether I'm in the US or in third world countries. I have never worn a hoodie, but I do pack a backpack once in awhile.

According to the Zimmerman apologists (including you), I'm a potential robber.

I'm not in need to steal from anyone; we have enough cash to buy what we want.

Even skittles and a soft drink.

2 Replies

@cicerone imposter,

An when you are walking do you jump anyone that followed you and try to beat them to death?

0 Replies

@OmSigDAVID,

The beating of Zimmerman's head on the cement has not been proven. It was a show put on by the defense attorney that the prosecution failed to challenge.

None of Zimmerman's injury was traumatic. NONE.

"Beating his head on the cement" was never proven.

Beyond all that, most of us know that Zimmerman is a liar.

You're not only ignorant, but stupid as well. You parrot things you only imagine in your own calcified brain.

2 Replies

The State of Florida vs George Zimmerman: The Trial

Related Topics

Quick Links

My Account

able2know