The State of Florida vs George Zimmerman: The Trial

Zimmerman is a perceptive guy. He is welcome to patrol my neighborhood any time he likes.

"oh, there goes a black kid, wearing a hoodie, walking in the rain, we better ask what the heck he thinks he is doing..."

Martin was into what is called "lean", or "purple drank", which is not the same thing as angle-dust/PCP.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Purple_drank

A black kid wearing a hoodie in the rain and carrying skittles is deadly in Florida.

Sorry nothing that shown that Zimmerman gave a **** about Trayvon skin color...

Trayvon Martin must have been violent, must have been a gangster, must have been a drug dealer or drug addict. Because were this not the case—were he simply, as he was, a teenager carrying a can of iced tea and a pack of Skittles minding his own business and on his way home—it would suggest that perhaps the vigilante fantasy that so pervades the conservative camp might be mistaken; that perhaps standing one's ground for so-called Second Amendment remedies could result in the death of an innocent teenager, rather than justified self-defense against one of Boortz' so-called "urban thugs..."

http://www.dailykos.com/story/2013/07/21/1224296/-Killing-Trayvon-Martin-s-soul#

Quote:

Sorry nothing that shown that Zimmerman gave a **** about Trayvon skin color...

Except, of course, his racial profiling of Martin, which was based on his skin color...Zimmerman saw Martin as one of those "f--king punks", the black "assholes who always get away."

And, if you don't share Zimmerman's penchant for racial profiling, then why have you, in support of Zimmerman, been repeatedly referring to Trayvon Martin, who had no history of violence or aggressive behaviors, and no criminal record, as a "hoodlum" or "thug"--except to try to link Martin, a middle class high school student, with ghetto-type young black criminals and anti-social types?. Why do you need to demonize Trayvon Martin as some sort of "urban thug" when that was not this kid's background or his behavior pattern? Simply because he was black?

Quote:

Trayvon Martin must have been violent, must have been a gangster, must have been a drug dealer or drug addict. Because were this not the case—were he simply, as he was, a teenager carrying a can of iced tea and a pack of Skittles minding his own business and on his way home—it would suggest that perhaps the vigilante fantasy that so pervades the conservative camp might be mistaken; that perhaps standing one's ground for so-called Second Amendment remedies could result in the death of an innocent teenager, rather than justified self-defense against one of Boortz' so-called "urban thugs..."

http://www.dailykos.com/story/2013/07/21/1224296/-Killing-Trayvon-Martin-s-soul#

This has to do with Zimmerman's racial profiling of Martin that night, how he generally related to black people is irrelevant.

If he generally related well to black people, then it makes it less likely that he did racially profile Martin...

Quote:

If he generally related well to black people, then it makes it less likely that he did racially profile Martin...

Not at all.

Zimmerman was constantly calling the police about "suspicious" black males.

And yet, he went out of his way to defend a homeless black man who had been mistreated.

The story is BS because there is NOTHING that shows the jewelry was stolen. Since there is no owner claiming the jewelry was stolen and identifying that jewelry there is ZERO evidence that the jewelry was stolen let alone that Trayvon Martin stole it.

You keep promoting the "purple drank" story and yet there is clear evidence from the toxicology report that no such thing was in his system.

"Trayvon liked mixing his Dextromethorphan with AriZona Watermellon Fruit Drink with Skittles dissolved in it. "

please support this statement with facts.

also please show me where angel dust was ever mentioned by anyone but you