@cicerone imposter,
Quote:The prosecution did a terrible job, and if I were on the jury and had to follow the judge's instructions, there was no way to find Zimmerman guilty.
I would have found him guilty of manslaughter.
And, when the jury first began deliberating, and voting, 2 jurors voted for manslaughter, and 1 voted for second degree murder. So this was no slam dunk for the defense--half of the jurors felt he was guilty from the start.
I accepted the verdict, but, after hearing from two of the jurors, I can no longer respect that verdict. They really did not understand the law--particularly this last juror. To say that, "George Zimmerman got away with murder," is outrageous on the part of a juror who voted to acquit.
It doesn't matter whether Zimmerman's fears were real or imagined, if he created the entire situation that led to a death, through his reckless and impulsive actions, that's manslaughter.
The prosecution did not instruct the jury properly. They spent almost no time explaining the law to them. And that's why the jurors were left confused.
This juror just added substantial fuel to the fire that's continuing to demand justice for Trayvon Martin, she's admitted that this jury failed to give the victim justice in this case.