27
   

The State of Florida vs George Zimmerman: The Trial

 
 
Frank Apisa
 
  1  
Thu 25 Jul, 2013 04:08 pm
@OmSigDAVID,
OmSigDAVID wrote:

OmSigDAVID wrote:


I 've carried handguns since age 8
for self defense and a feeling of tranquility.
Thay have never been related to sexuality in my mind.

Sex has never been discussed at any gun freedom meeting
that I know of in the last half century. Thay are usually family events
with wives and children in attendance. We discuss defensive freedom
in the law and optimal defensive hardware; sometimes including target shooting.
We discuss the political defeat of authoritarian politicians.

Sex and guns mix only in the imaginations
of those leftists who abhor liberty; harmless foolishness.

Bill Clinton was anti-gun freedom; how did his Monica and Hillary feel about gun freedom ?





David
Frank Apisa wrote:
David...do you actually think it is okay to require that we live
in a society that will allow 8 year olds to carry guns?

Truly...do you think that is okay?
Violating their 2nd Amendment rights is raping them out of their rights to live.



Your concept, Frank, is that it is OK
to violate the citizen's most fundmental Constitutional Rights
as long as u disdain his intelligence first, adding insult to injury.

The US Supreme Court has held that
he cannot even be denied a few minutes of inferior seating on a bus,
because of the Constitutional requirements of "equal protection of the laws".
Much less can citizens be raped out of their rights to defend their lives
from the predatory violence of man or beast.

In the 5 years that I lived in Arizona, my nabors were better armed than I was
(both older and younger) and we never had any trouble;
no lights and sirens at all. I respect children 's minds better than u do.





David


Ummmm...was that a "yes" or "no", David?
revelette
 
  3  
Thu 25 Jul, 2013 04:26 pm
So far four jurors have distanced themselves from juror B37, now the last juror who haven't heard from has finally spoken.

Trayvon Martin Juror B29: ‘George Zimmerman got away with murder’

Quote:
Filled with regrets and doubt, the only minority on the Florida jury made up entirely of women that found George Zimmerman not guilty of murdering Trayvon Martin says that she “can’t sleep at night.”

“George Zimmerman got away with murder,” Maddy, who declined to give her last name, said in an interview with ABC’s Robin Roberts on "Good Morning America," “but you can't get away from God. And at the end of the day, he's going to have a lot of questions and answers he has to deal with."

A 36-year-old of Puerto Rican decent, Maddy said that while she and many of her fellow jurors believed that Zimmerman was guilty of murdering Martin at a housing community in Sanford, Fla. on Feb. 26, “the law couldn’t prove it.”

"You can't put the man in jail even though in our hearts we felt he was guilty," the woman, who has previously been known as Juror B29, told Roberts. "But we had to grab our hearts and put it aside and look at the evidence."

The realization that the jury would likely not find Zimmerman guilty of second-degree murder began to set in on the second day of deliberations, Maddy said.

"As much as we were trying to find this man guilty … they give you a booklet that basically tells you the truth, and the truth is that there was nothing that we could do about it," she said. "I feel the verdict was already told."

The question at the center of the case was whether Zimmerman, who confessed to shooting Martin, had acted in self-defense, and was therefore justified in using his gun against the teenager.

"That's where I felt confused, where if a person kills someone, then you get charged for it," Maddy said. "But as the law was read to me, if you have no proof that he killed him intentionally, you can't say he's guilty."

Though she felt that her hands were tied when it came to rendering the verdict, Maddy says she still struggles with the outcome of the case.

"It's hard for me to sleep, it's hard for me to eat because I feel I was forcefully included in Trayvon Martin's death. And as I carry him on my back, I'm hurting as much Trayvon's Martin's mother because there's no way that any mother should feel that pain," she said.

The full interview with the juror will air on Friday on “Good Morning America.”





BillRM
 
  1  
Thu 25 Jul, 2013 04:37 pm
@revelette,
Quote:
That's where I felt confused, where if a person kills someone, then you get charged for it," Maddy said. "But as the law was read to me, if you have no proof that he killed him intentionally, you can't say he's guilty."


Not a bright woman if she think that every time someone killed another person he or she had done something he or she should be punish for.

Thank god there was brighter women on that jury and in the end they pound the facts into her brain.

Of course she could be bright enough to try to get off the kill list of the haters who are just rubbing their hands together for the names of the jurors to come out and have even stated openly that the children of these women should be killed.


'
Quote:


http://www.examiner.com/article/twitter-lynch-mob-targets-zimmerman-jury-with-death-threats

Twitter lynch mob' targets Zimmerman jury with death threats
CRIME & COURTSJULY 14, 2013BY: JOE NEWBYSubscribe


George Zimmerman, the neighborhood watch volunteer acquitted Saturday in the shooting death of Trayvon Martin, is not the only recipient of death threats from users of Twitter. Now, some -- known as the "Twitter lynch mob" by Twitchy -- have targeted the six women who served on the jury with profane tweets that include racist slurs and death threats.


"The jury better invest in the biggest security they can people are coming after them too," one person tweeted.

"Zimmerman got the least of worries the real crazy folks are coming after the the jury for making the decision," added "God Hand."

"Somebody should kill one of the jury members sons and let the killer free, (sic)" said one Twitter user.

Twitchy said that "bloodthirsty sickos" were looking for the jurors' addresses.

"Find the address of every fool in the jury," said "JDervon."

"[S]urely somebody knows the address of the jury," added "Keith Dingle."

"I want all 6 jury folks address," demanded "korean."

"Where these jury h*es stay? Can we get they address? (sic)" asked one Twitter user.

"What's the jury address we need to kill that Mf (sic)," said "Niarbre Bank."

Some wanted the addresses of Zimmerman's attorneys while others demanded the jurors' addresses and pictures be broadcast on television so they could be easily identified and targeted.

Several demanded that members of the jury be murdered along with Zimmerman, his attorney and wife.

"The purge should be in Florida just for tonight Kill the jury Kill Zimmerman. Kill the lawyers Kill Zimmerman wife (sic)," tweeted "Kidd."

Twitchy noted that Twitter's rules prohibit the threats that have been repeatedly leveled at Zimmerman and now, members of the jury who followed the letter of Florida law.

"You may not publish or post direct, specific threats of violence against others," says Twitter's rules.

Related:
BillRM
 
  0  
Thu 25 Jul, 2013 04:47 pm
@BillRM,
Too back the FBI is too busy trying to find anything that would indicate that Zimmerman is a racist to look into these threats.
0 Replies
 
OmSigDAVID
 
  1  
Thu 25 Jul, 2013 06:16 pm
@revelette,
revelette wrote:
So far four jurors have distanced themselves from juror B37,
now the last juror who haven't heard from has finally spoken.

Trayvon Martin Juror B29: ‘George Zimmerman got away with murder’

Quote:
Filled with regrets and doubt, the only minority on the Florida jury made up entirely of women that found George Zimmerman not guilty of murdering Trayvon Martin says that she “can’t sleep at night.”

“George Zimmerman got away with murder,” Maddy, who declined to give her last name, said in an interview with ABC’s Robin Roberts on "Good Morning America," “but you can't get away from God. And at the end of the day, he's going to have a lot of questions and answers he has to deal with."

A 36-year-old of Puerto Rican decent, Maddy said that while she and many of her fellow jurors believed that Zimmerman was guilty of murdering Martin at a housing community in Sanford, Fla. on Feb. 26, “the law couldn’t prove it.”

"You can't put the man in jail even though in our hearts we felt he was guilty," the woman, who has previously been known as Juror B29, told Roberts. "But we had to grab our hearts and put it aside and look at the evidence."

The realization that the jury would likely not find Zimmerman guilty of second-degree murder began to set in on the second day of deliberations, Maddy said.

"As much as we were trying to find this man guilty … they give you a booklet that basically tells you the truth, and the truth is that there was nothing that we could do about it," she said. "I feel the verdict was already told."

The question at the center of the case was whether Zimmerman, who confessed to shooting Martin, had acted in self-defense, and was therefore justified in using his gun against the teenager.

"That's where I felt confused, where if a person kills someone, then you get charged for it," Maddy said. "But as the law was read to me, if you have no proof that he killed him intentionally, you can't say he's guilty."

Though she felt that her hands were tied when it came to rendering the verdict, Maddy says she still struggles with the outcome of the case.

"It's hard for me to sleep, it's hard for me to eat because I feel I was forcefully included in Trayvon Martin's death. And as I carry him on my back, I'm hurting as much Trayvon's Martin's mother because there's no way that any mother should feel that pain," she said.

The full interview with the juror will air on Friday on “Good Morning America.”
If Zimmy had been convicted,
then that woud have created a new rule of law (an ex post facto law) in Florida
that it is a violent crime in Florida to follow someone,
whereas it had been perfectly lawful to do so earlier in the day
and everyone woud have agreed with that while the bad guy still lived.
That 'd be a new rule of caselaw (if the court allowed it)
that if u see a burglar at work, then u owe a duty to PROTECT that burglar
(if he is a black) by staying away from him.

Presumably, a conviction based on such a record
as in Zimmy 's case woud have been overturned on appeal.





David
BillRM
 
  0  
Thu 25 Jul, 2013 06:26 pm
@OmSigDAVID,
David I am beginning to think that the government reason at any level in not doing anything about the death threats is that they wish jurors and lawyers to worry about coming to the "wrong" verdict or defending the "wrong" client the next time.
OmSigDAVID
 
  1  
Thu 25 Jul, 2013 06:31 pm
@Frank Apisa,
OmSigDAVID wrote:

OmSigDAVID wrote:


I 've carried handguns since age 8
for self defense and a feeling of tranquility.
Thay have never been related to sexuality in my mind.

Sex has never been discussed at any gun freedom meeting
that I know of in the last half century. Thay are usually family events
with wives and children in attendance. We discuss defensive freedom
in the law and optimal defensive hardware; sometimes including target shooting.
We discuss the political defeat of authoritarian politicians.

Sex and guns mix only in the imaginations
of those leftists who abhor liberty; harmless foolishness.

Bill Clinton was anti-gun freedom; how did his Monica and Hillary feel about gun freedom ?





David
Frank Apisa wrote:
David...do you actually think it is okay to require that we live
in a society that will allow 8 year olds to carry guns?

Truly...do you think that is okay?
Violating their 2nd Amendment rights is raping them out of their rights to live.



Your concept, Frank, is that it is OK
to violate the citizen's most fundmental Constitutional Rights
as long as u disdain his intelligence first, adding insult to injury.

The US Supreme Court has held that
he cannot even be denied a few minutes of inferior seating on a bus,
because of the Constitutional requirements of "equal protection of the laws".
Much less can citizens be raped out of their rights to defend their lives
from the predatory violence of man or beast.

In the 5 years that I lived in Arizona, my nabors were better armed than I was
(both older and younger) and we never had any trouble;
no lights and sirens at all. I respect children 's minds better than u do.





David
Frank Apisa wrote:
Ummmm...was that a "yes" or "no", David?
I enjoy your sense of humor, Frank.
It was and it is OK for 8 year olds to bear arms
in defense of their lives from predatory violence.

Lemme add that the same way that a citizen
shud not just get into a car and drive it away, if he has had no training
in driving it, so also young students shud be trained as youngly as possible
in school concerning accuracy and safety in firearms handling.





David
0 Replies
 
hawkeye10
 
  2  
Thu 25 Jul, 2013 06:33 pm
@BillRM,
"I feel like we let the Martins down" says B29.....no, by upholding the law you did what you were supposed to do, and even better at this point would be condemning the state for abusing zimmerman.

Talk about misplaced priorities!
OmSigDAVID
 
  1  
Thu 25 Jul, 2013 06:41 pm
@Frank Apisa,
The autobiographies of Wild Bill Hickok and of Annie Oakley
were strikingly similar in 1 respect: thay both described
growing up out in the wilderness. Wild Bill, at the age of 9
had his father thrust a rifle into his arms and command him
not to come back without lunch. Annie Oakley described
her mother doing and saying essentially the same thing,
when she was 8. Thay both continued hunting food for family meals
so ofen that thay practiced with daily trick shots, out in the forest.

Thay got good.





David
0 Replies
 
OmSigDAVID
 
  2  
Thu 25 Jul, 2013 06:43 pm
@hawkeye10,
hawkeye10 wrote:

"I feel like we let the Martins down" says B29.....no, by upholding the law you did what you were supposed to do,
and even better at this point would be condemning the state for abusing zimmerman.

Talk about misplaced priorities!
It woud have been a lot worse to have let the Zimmermen down.





David
0 Replies
 
firefly
 
  1  
Thu 25 Jul, 2013 07:05 pm
@revelette,
I just heard one legal analyst on CNN say that this juror misunderstood the law, and this juror is the one who had a question about manslaughter that never got answered.

The juror said, "But as the law was read to me, if you have no proof that he killed him intentionally, you can't say he's guilty" and the legal analyst pointed out there was no question that Zimmerman fired the gun intentionally, and that's what this juror didn't understand correctly. The shooting wasn't accidental, it was intentional. They could have found him guilty.

That same legal analyst faulted the prosecution for not better explaining the law and instructions to the jury, and I definitely agree with that.
Quote:
she and many of her fellow jurors believed that Zimmerman was guilty of murdering Martin...

If they believed that, that means they shouldn't have acquitted him. It means they did believe the prosecution's case and evidence. I don't wonder she can't sleep at night.

They just didn't understand the law or how they were supposed to follow it. Not if this juror believes, “George Zimmerman got away with murder.”

I think all murder cases should have 12 person juries. Most states, I think, do require 12 person juries when there is a murder charge.





cicerone imposter
 
  1  
Thu 25 Jul, 2013 07:20 pm
@firefly,
I blame most of the fault to the prosecution for doing such a poor job. They missed a lot of opportunities that was never addressed, because of their incompetence.
firefly
 
  1  
Thu 25 Jul, 2013 07:30 pm
@cicerone imposter,
The prosecution apparently did a good enough job that they convinced this juror that Zimmerman did murder Trayvon Martin.

Not making sure the jurors really understood the law, and how to interpret it, may have been their biggest mistake.

For a juror to vote to acquit, and to then say afterward, "George Zimmerman got away with murder," is crazy. And she's apparently not the only juror who feels that way.
cicerone imposter
 
  1  
Thu 25 Jul, 2013 07:53 pm
@firefly,
I don't think so. The prosecution did a terrible job, and if I were on the jury and had to follow the judge's instructions, there was no way to find Zimmerman guilty.

I agreed with the jury verdict, and blame the prosecution for failing to challenge many of the things the defense presented.

If Zimmerman had the legal right to defend himself from fear, why can't Martin use that same right to defend himself from a predator?

When the defense used a doll to show how Martin slammed Zimmerman's head against the cement, the prosecution didn't even challenge the fact that a doll has no resistance. That was total theatrics. Additionally, the prosecution could have reinforced the information that Zimmerman suffered no trauma, and refused to be taken to the hospital.

If Zimmerman was like a rag-doll, his injuries would have been more serious. It wasn't.

Zimmerman's fear was all imagined, while Martin's fear was real. Martin was just a kid being followed by a stranger.






BillRM
 
  0  
Thu 25 Jul, 2013 08:03 pm
@cicerone imposter,
Quote:
Zimmerman's fear was all imagined, while Martin's fear was real. Martin was just a kid being followed by a stranger.


Yes I know for sure there is no god as if there was a god you and Firefly and others such members of this website would find themselves with an out of control 17 years old on top of them hitting away and slamming their heads on the ground and just to add some more fun interfering with their breathing.

After the poor child teenager then try to get a hold of your gun we will stop the process and see if your fear was for real or not.

firefly
 
  3  
Thu 25 Jul, 2013 08:10 pm
@BillRM,
Other than one punch to the nose, and 2 tiny scrapes on the back of the head, where was any evidence of an, "out of control 17 years old on top of them hitting away and slamming their heads on the ground"? How come no other bruises on Zimmerman's face or body from all those alleged punches? How come no goose-eggs, bruises, or swellings, on the back of Zimmerman's head from all that "slamming"?

You're engaging in fiction. So was Zimmerman in his account to the police. His minor injuries don't support that fictional narrative.

cicerone imposter
 
  1  
Thu 25 Jul, 2013 08:11 pm
@firefly,
Don't forget, there was none of Zimmerman's blood on Martin. NONE.
firefly
 
  1  
Thu 25 Jul, 2013 08:38 pm
@cicerone imposter,
Quote:
The prosecution did a terrible job, and if I were on the jury and had to follow the judge's instructions, there was no way to find Zimmerman guilty.

I would have found him guilty of manslaughter.

And, when the jury first began deliberating, and voting, 2 jurors voted for manslaughter, and 1 voted for second degree murder. So this was no slam dunk for the defense--half of the jurors felt he was guilty from the start.

I accepted the verdict, but, after hearing from two of the jurors, I can no longer respect that verdict. They really did not understand the law--particularly this last juror. To say that, "George Zimmerman got away with murder," is outrageous on the part of a juror who voted to acquit.

It doesn't matter whether Zimmerman's fears were real or imagined, if he created the entire situation that led to a death, through his reckless and impulsive actions, that's manslaughter.

The prosecution did not instruct the jury properly. They spent almost no time explaining the law to them. And that's why the jurors were left confused.

This juror just added substantial fuel to the fire that's continuing to demand justice for Trayvon Martin, she's admitted that this jury failed to give the victim justice in this case.
0 Replies
 
BillRM
 
  1  
Thu 25 Jul, 2013 09:17 pm
@cicerone imposter,
Quote:
Don't forget, there was none of Zimmerman's blood on Martin. NONE


Why do I think you are full of **** but please give a link to the claim that there was no Zimmerman blood found on Trayvon.
BillRM
 
  1  
Thu 25 Jul, 2013 09:32 pm
@cicerone imposter,
Seem like rain and poor police work combine to ruin some of the evidence but there was Zimmerman DNA on Trayvon,


Quote:


http://www.hlntv.com/article/2013/07/03/george-zimmerman-trial-trayvon-martin-day-8

Gorgone testified that testing of Martin's hooded jacket that he was wearing as an outer layer the night of shooting did not yield much of Zimmerman's DNA. Only one stain on Martin's hooded jacket yielded a partial DNA profile that matched Zimmerman. This may challenge the claim Zimmerman and Martin were in fight for their lives, if only a minimal amount of Zimmerman's skin or blood transferred to Martin's outer clothing. Scrapings from under Martin's fingernails yielded none of Zimmerman's DNA.

Martin was also wearing a gray sweatshirt under his hooded jacket. Gorgone said two stains on that sweatshirt matched both Martin's and Zimmerman's DNA.

During cross examination, defense attorney Don West pointed out that Martin's sweatshirts were wet from rain the night of the shooting, and they were not allowed dry before they were stored in plastic bags. Gorgone said if wet evidence is not left to air dry before being stored in plastic mildew can degrade DNA evidence.

West asked, "Frankly then you just didn't find much of anything on this gray hooded sweatshirt when it boils right down to it?"

"Just that partial profile on stain A" said Gorgone.

West asked, "That was the shirt that stunk to high heaven?"

"It didn't smell good," said Gorgone.
0 Replies
 
 

Related Topics

 
Copyright © 2024 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.13 seconds on 11/24/2024 at 12:52:26