@engineer,
engineer wrote:
Frank Apisa wrote:
The people making the most fuss about it are the ones who, if a another serious attack occurred here or elsewhere in the world, would be demanding to know why the government had not done more to prevent it.
I'm one of the ones making a fuss, but if another serious attack occurs, you will not see me screaming about it. The number of deaths by toddlers wielding hand guns exceeds the number of terrorism deaths in the US in 2013 (by 4 to 1). There are ~30,000 auto deaths in the US in any given year and I'm not demanding all my rights be taken away to prevent them. Drunk driving deaths are around 10,000 annually but I'm not calling for prohibition. The idea that we will give up all the protections of the fourth amendment to possibly prevent a few deaths is laughable when we look at the routine risks we tolerate every day. You are giving up a lot for very little return.
Perhaps. But the "giving up" is no longer a matter of choice. The technology has progressed to where it is unavoidable...and the good folk thinking they can turn back the clock are in for a very disturbing future.
I understand and appreciate your position, Engineer, but the changing world is moving at an accelerated pace.
MY GUESS: At some point, there will be no privacy as we know it right now...and it will be completely acceptable by the people living here.