17
   

We Have No Privacy, We Are Always Being Watched.

 
 
Frank Apisa
 
  0  
Reply Thu 8 Aug, 2013 01:34 pm
@engineer,
engineer wrote:

Frank Apisa wrote:

The people making the most fuss about it are the ones who, if a another serious attack occurred here or elsewhere in the world, would be demanding to know why the government had not done more to prevent it.

I'm one of the ones making a fuss, but if another serious attack occurs, you will not see me screaming about it. The number of deaths by toddlers wielding hand guns exceeds the number of terrorism deaths in the US in 2013 (by 4 to 1). There are ~30,000 auto deaths in the US in any given year and I'm not demanding all my rights be taken away to prevent them. Drunk driving deaths are around 10,000 annually but I'm not calling for prohibition. The idea that we will give up all the protections of the fourth amendment to possibly prevent a few deaths is laughable when we look at the routine risks we tolerate every day. You are giving up a lot for very little return.


Perhaps. But the "giving up" is no longer a matter of choice. The technology has progressed to where it is unavoidable...and the good folk thinking they can turn back the clock are in for a very disturbing future.

I understand and appreciate your position, Engineer, but the changing world is moving at an accelerated pace.

MY GUESS: At some point, there will be no privacy as we know it right now...and it will be completely acceptable by the people living here.
engineer
 
  2  
Reply Thu 8 Aug, 2013 02:00 pm
@spendius,
spendius wrote:

Terrorist caused deaths are an effort to change our way of life, drastically, and those engaged in them attempt maximum effect.

And they are succeeding! Because of terrorist attacks, people who used to believe that we should be mostly free from government intrusion in our personal lives have lost the right to that privacy. This massive diminution in our rights represents a complete success for terrorism IMO.
BillRM
 
  3  
Reply Thu 8 Aug, 2013 02:01 pm
@Frank Apisa,
Quote:
But the "giving up" is no longer a matter of choice. The technology has progressed to where it is unavoidable...and the good folk thinking they can turn back the clock are in for a very disturbing future.


Nonsense it is not unavoidable to put hardware in place on the main backbones to monitor/record all traffic and it is not unavoidable to build a few billions dollar computer center in Utah with five billion terabytes just to start with.

Bulldozing this new center after selling all the hard drives and other hardware for used of the private sectors would be a damn good start.

A police/surveillance state is not unavoidable.
Frank Apisa
 
  0  
Reply Thu 8 Aug, 2013 02:33 pm
@engineer,
engineer wrote:

spendius wrote:

Terrorist caused deaths are an effort to change our way of life, drastically, and those engaged in them attempt maximum effect.

And they are succeeding! Because of terrorist attacks, people who used to believe that we should be mostly free from government intrusion in our personal lives have lost the right to that privacy. This massive diminution in our rights represents a complete success for terrorism IMO.


Yup. So, we can take our loss...or double down and keep the privacy and allow them to do even more damage.

The privacy is GONE...whether we face terrorism or not. The technology has already decided that. If it is not the NSA...it will be someone or something else...probably business run with profit as a motive...

...and be much, much worse.
Frank Apisa
 
  0  
Reply Thu 8 Aug, 2013 02:35 pm
@BillRM,
BillRM wrote:

Quote:
But the "giving up" is no longer a matter of choice. The technology has progressed to where it is unavoidable...and the good folk thinking they can turn back the clock are in for a very disturbing future.


Nonsense it is not unavoidable to put hardware in place on the main backbones to monitor/record all traffic and it is not unavoidable to build a few billions dollar computer center in Utah with five billion terabytes just to start with.

Bulldozing this new center after selling all the hard drives and other hardware for used of the private sectors would be a damn good start.

A police/surveillance state is not unavoidable.


Okay...I thank you for your opinion.

Mine, obviously, differs.

History will be the judge of which of us predicted correctly.
0 Replies
 
Thomas
 
  3  
Reply Thu 8 Aug, 2013 02:38 pm
@engineer,
engineer wrote:
And they are succeeding! Because of terrorist attacks, people who used to believe that we should be mostly free from government intrusion in our personal lives have lost the right to that privacy. This massive diminution in our rights represents a complete success for terrorism IMO.

True. Terrorism, considered as just another public-safety hazard, is far less of a problem than traffic accidents, industrial pollution, swimming pools, or parents who don't vaccinate their children. It is the government's overreaction to the hazard, not the hazard itself, that impairs and degrades our way of life.
BillRM
 
  2  
Reply Thu 8 Aug, 2013 03:05 pm
@Frank Apisa,
Quote:
The privacy is GONE...whether we face terrorism or not. The technology has already decided that. If it is not the NSA...it will be someone or something else...probably business run with profit as a motive...


Bullshit there is no reason to allowed private businesses to tap the internet anymore then in allowing the government to do so.

Just because it is possible to set up a surveillance state does not mean that such a state should be allowed to be set up!!!!!!!
spendius
 
  1  
Reply Thu 8 Aug, 2013 03:09 pm
@engineer,
Quote:
This massive diminution in our rights represents a complete success for terrorism IMO.


Yes. It certainly does. That was presumably the objective.

But as long as the concept of the great family "America" exists there will be an emotional response and it is that response that has caused the diminution which the attacks themselves could never have done.

When we are under attack the concept of our rights is not the same as when we are not threatened. And there is the possibility of a nuclear or biological attack to be considered.
0 Replies
 
Frank Apisa
 
  0  
Reply Thu 8 Aug, 2013 03:14 pm
@BillRM,
BillRM wrote:

Quote:
The privacy is GONE...whether we face terrorism or not. The technology has already decided that. If it is not the NSA...it will be someone or something else...probably business run with profit as a motive...


Bullshit there is no reason to allowed private businesses to tap the internet anymore then in allowing the government to do so.

Just because it is possible to set up a surveillance state does not mean that such a state should be allowed to be set up!!!!!!!


Right!

Your privacy is so important to businesses that they will respect it...religiously.

Gimme a break, will ya, Bill

In any case, we cannot resolve this. We have opinions on how this is going to play out. Only history will tell us which opinion was closer to what actually happens.
0 Replies
 
BillRM
 
  3  
Reply Thu 8 Aug, 2013 04:01 pm
@engineer,
Quote:
This massive diminution in our rights represents a complete success for terrorism IMO.


It not the terrorists who could care less about our freedoms it our rulers who are using the excused of terrorism to seized more power and control for themselves.
spendius
 
  2  
Reply Thu 8 Aug, 2013 05:11 pm
@BillRM,
Why not Bill? Power and control are their driving ambitions. They have all been educated in American schools so it is reasonable to assume you would all do the same if you got the chance.

You elected the fuckers. If you elected me I would wring your silly necks. When a population can't identify scumbag control freaks at a glance it deserves all it gets.
0 Replies
 
spendius
 
  2  
Reply Thu 8 Aug, 2013 05:23 pm
@Frank Apisa,
Quote:
.and we will be living a lot closer to George Orwell's 1984 world soon.


I don't think so. Huxley's Brave New World is much more likely. Who would give up having a different hottie every night when as high as a kite because he objected to being manipulated?
Frank Apisa
 
  1  
Reply Thu 8 Aug, 2013 05:42 pm
@spendius,
spendius wrote:

Quote:
.and we will be living a lot closer to George Orwell's 1984 world soon.


I don't think so. Huxley's Brave New World is much more likely. Who would give up having a different hottie every night when as high as a kite because he objected to being manipulated?


Well...in some respects, you have a very valid point here, Spendius. The morality of the next few decades will be shaped in ways that will surprise many.

But in the area of "privacy"...I think 1984 comes closer to what I was trying to suggest.
JTT
 
  1  
Reply Thu 8 Aug, 2013 06:14 pm
@BillRM,
Quote:
and it is not unavoidable to build a few billions dollar computer center in Utah with five billion terabytes just to start with.


4.9 billion terabytes of those 5 billion terabytes will be to save porn for the computer nerds to watch on the graveyard shift.
0 Replies
 
spendius
 
  1  
Reply Fri 9 Aug, 2013 03:04 pm
@Frank Apisa,
But in the BNW privacy has no meaning. Some of your recent confessions are going in that direction. When everything has a banal scientific explanation there is nothing left to be ashamed of.

Frank Apisa
 
  1  
Reply Fri 9 Aug, 2013 03:26 pm
@spendius,
spendius wrote:

But in the BNW privacy has no meaning. Some of your recent confessions are going in that direction. When everything has a banal scientific explanation there is nothing left to be ashamed of.


I try never to do anything that I ought be ashamed of, Spendius. (Not always successful!)
JTT
 
  1  
Reply Fri 9 Aug, 2013 04:51 pm
@Frank Apisa,
Quote:
I try never to do anything that I ought be ashamed of, Spendius. (Not always successful!)


The second part is a gross understatement, Frank. Lucky for you you are dumb enough that you don't twig onto just how often you do things that you ought to be ashamed of.
spendius
 
  1  
Reply Fri 9 Aug, 2013 05:19 pm
@JTT,
He is dumb enough for a lot more than that insignificant state of affairs.
JTT
 
  1  
Reply Fri 9 Aug, 2013 05:35 pm
@spendius,
What a tease you are, Spendi. Frank is going to die of curiosity or he will have to check what was said.
0 Replies
 
revelette
 
  1  
Reply Sat 10 Aug, 2013 06:00 am
NSA head says agency working to reduce leaks by replacing people with machines


Well, out of all this, this to me at least, makes sense.
 

Related Topics

 
Copyright © 2024 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.03 seconds on 05/07/2024 at 10:04:57