1
   

"I'm George W. Bush and I approve of this message."

 
 
caprice
 
Reply Sun 28 Mar, 2004 12:53 am
Can any of you republicans explain that one to me?

Seems that if "George W. Bush" is narrating his own campaign commercial, it would, by any common sense understanding, imply that he approves of it since he voiced it!!

For me it just adds to his image as a twit. Sorry for being insulting, but that's how I see it!
  • Topic Stats
  • Top Replies
  • Link to this Topic
Type: Discussion • Score: 1 • Views: 1,000 • Replies: 14
No top replies

 
Windtamer
 
  1  
Reply Sun 28 Mar, 2004 02:31 am
They have to be in the commercial now and endorse it due to some campaign reform programs. Its so that the candidates can't make a misleading ad and then claim it wasn't them who did it.
0 Replies
 
caprice
 
  1  
Reply Sun 28 Mar, 2004 02:37 am
Oh brother. How absolutely lame!

Thanks for the explanation though. Still....wouldn't the words "approved by the Bush campaign" at the end of the message do the job? Bush saying it sounds so....well....stupid.
0 Replies
 
Windtamer
 
  1  
Reply Sun 28 Mar, 2004 03:26 am
Hehe. Pretty much anything Bush says sounds stupid.
0 Replies
 
Phoenix32890
 
  1  
Reply Sun 28 Mar, 2004 05:37 am
Can't say for sure, but I think that it had something to do with an ad that was highly criticized. I believe that Bush claimed that he had no input into the ad. Now he will give his "seal of approval" to show that he knows about, and endorses the ad.

Can anyone help me with the particulars?
0 Replies
 
Windtamer
 
  1  
Reply Sun 28 Mar, 2004 05:55 am
This is a part of John McCains finance reform bill. This was passed just about a year ago I believe. All candidates running for office that have TV ads have to be on that commercial stating that they endorse that message so that they can't go back and say they had nothing to do with the ad.
0 Replies
 
Phoenix32890
 
  1  
Reply Sun 28 Mar, 2004 06:15 am
Windtamer- Thanks for the clarification! Very Happy
0 Replies
 
PDiddie
 
  1  
Reply Sun 28 Mar, 2004 07:16 am
Windtamer's right. McCain-Feingold campaign reform legislation requires it.
0 Replies
 
Setanta
 
  1  
Reply Sun 28 Mar, 2004 08:35 am
Rolling Eyes


I am Setanta, and i approve of this eye-roll . . .
0 Replies
 
Titus
 
  1  
Reply Sun 28 Mar, 2004 08:39 am
I'm delighted to hear it.

Then, I know it's time to change the channel. :wink:
0 Replies
 
caprice
 
  1  
Reply Sun 28 Mar, 2004 12:52 pm
Ya see it's the pop culture invasion that allows we canajuns to know so much about Americans. We get their t.v., their movies, their music, their magazines (sometimes the "canajun" version, such as with Reader's Digest)...though I think t.v. is the biggest influence.

Somehow I just don't wanna know about Bush's campaign message. Mr. Green
0 Replies
 
Rick d Israeli
 
  1  
Reply Sun 28 Mar, 2004 01:17 pm
Funny, those American campaign commercials. Always so, I don't know...fuzzy. Here in the Netherlands, commercials of political parties are always so unprofessional. The leader of the party, saying some words about what they are gonna change, just straight to the point...I think image is just not so important here in politics as it is in America (look at our prime minister - Jan-Peter Balkenende! We know where Harry Potter's dad is!)
0 Replies
 
PDiddie
 
  1  
Reply Thu 8 Apr, 2004 12:48 pm
"John Kerry will raise taxes by 100 zillion dollars.

He will increase fees on gasoline by $500.00 per gallon.

He will allow terrorists to take over our country.

He will rape Christian women and imprison Christian men.

I don't make George Bush's commercials...I make George Bush's commercials BETTER."
0 Replies
 
Tarantulas
 
  1  
Reply Thu 8 Apr, 2004 12:56 pm
I heard some guy from the Netherlands on a radio talk show last night. He was talking about how the Moroccans had formed a political party and were trying to take over the government so they could make the Netherlands an Islamic state. But he said they didn't win any seats in Parliament.

I wish the campaign ads would focus on what the candidate plans to do if elected, rather than ripping on the opponent. It seems like the winner is determined by how much mud can be slung and how many campaign signs can be erected. That's not how politics should operate.
0 Replies
 
Rick d Israeli
 
  1  
Reply Thu 8 Apr, 2004 12:56 pm
:wink:
0 Replies
 
 

Related Topics

Obama '08? - Discussion by sozobe
Let's get rid of the Electoral College - Discussion by Robert Gentel
McCain's VP: - Discussion by Cycloptichorn
Food Stamp Turkeys - Discussion by H2O MAN
The 2008 Democrat Convention - Discussion by Lash
McCain is blowing his election chances. - Discussion by McGentrix
Snowdon is a dummy - Discussion by cicerone imposter
TEA PARTY TO AMERICA: NOW WHAT?! - Discussion by farmerman
 
  1. Forums
  2. » "I'm George W. Bush and I approve of this message."
Copyright © 2024 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.03 seconds on 05/17/2024 at 11:59:12