Umbagog wrote:The loss of life that saves others... ...are honorable and worthy of respect.
I took the liberty of editing out the parts that were unnecessary or didn't make sense.
I assure you Pistoff wasn't serious about Nuking Yongbyon and neither was I
Conventional weapons will do just fine. His suggestion of simultaneous "shock and awe" type attacks on all of Kim's military installations is a loose quoting of what I truly believe should happen. Kim has killed millions of HUMAN BEINGS. I repeat; MILLIONS. What better justification for an attack is there?
His jibe about "That would give China somethin' the think 'bout, eh?" is also a shot at my logic. First Afghanistan, then Iraq and hopefully we won't have to fight North Korea They should see the writing on the wall. (Libya and Pakistan are showing positive signs of being able to read it). If not; we should attack them next. China is the most dangerous of all offenders. But, I honestly think we could alter their behavior with trade restrictions.
I am a warmonger because I believe the despots that fail to recognize human rights have become too technologically advanced to succumb to rebellions from within. Without help from a superior force, these HUMAN BEINGS will continue to suffer without hope untold, horrific fates, day after day forever. To me; killing murderers is more palatable (and humane), than watching from a comfortable distance while they commit their murders.
The U.S., like no country in history, has both the economic AND the military superiority to truly bring human rights (and food for Christ's sake) to every corner of the world. I agree with Pistoff and Hobit that this is not the goal of our leaders, but I submit that it should be. I truly believe if we made world peace our stated goal; the coalition of the willing would become an irresistible force. I further believe that a two-pronged "offer you can't refuse" is the only way to achieve this goal. It saddens me that most people believe world peace is impossible. Terrorism is here to stay. State sponsored terrorism just doesn't have to be.
Consider this: If everyone on A2K were living in North Korea, only a handful of us would survive the State's Scrutiny of our posts. Half of us would be arrested, along with our families, and sent to a camp to be tortured to death for our dissention. Is this not terrorism? If it is; then Kim Jong Il is probably the worst terrorist alive today.
Iraqi's are demonstrating against what they consider injustice without Saddam telling them why for the first time in forever. They may one day have a representative system of government that is fair to all of its citizens. This is a beautiful thing, regardless of Bush's motivation. Saddam's regime killed over a MILLION HUMAN BEINGS. If a few thousand heroes fall fighting to liberate millions of would-be victims and possibly set up an example for all of the suffering HUMAN BEINGS in the Middle East to follow; then I believe their deaths are as meaningful as any who fell before them. Peace, out.