Reply Tue 7 May, 2013 08:37 pm
By any estimation, Obama placed himself in an embarrassing situation when he backed off his blustery threat, regarding chemical weapons use, to the Syrian regime.

TR asserted "Walk softly and carry a big stick." Obama's interpretation seems to be "Walk toughly and carry a limp dick."

I am not in favor of US military intervention in Syria, but I am not content with agreeing broadly with the president.

Should we not expect that our president can explain (without a load of double-speak crap) why it was in the interest of America to intervene in Libya but it isn't in the case of Syria?


  • Topic Stats
  • Top Replies
  • Link to this Topic
Type: Question • Score: 0 • Views: 906 • Replies: 0
No top replies

 
 

Related Topics

Obama '08? - Discussion by sozobe
Let's get rid of the Electoral College - Discussion by Robert Gentel
McCain's VP: - Discussion by Cycloptichorn
McCain is blowing his election chances. - Discussion by McGentrix
Food Stamp Turkeys - Discussion by H2O MAN
The 2008 Democrat Convention - Discussion by Lash
Snowdon is a dummy - Discussion by cicerone imposter
GAFFNEY: Whose side is Obama on? - Discussion by gungasnake
 
  1. Forums
  2. » The Laying of Red Lines
Copyright © 2017 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.03 seconds on 11/21/2017 at 05:57:33