3
   

Could you describe the part in red with more details?

 
 
Reply Sun 31 Mar, 2013 10:32 am

Context:

Now we are witnessing the transition to yet another scholarly communication system — one that will harness the technology of the Web to vastly improve dissemination. What the journal did for a single, formal product (the article), the Web is doing for the entire breadth of scholarly output. The article was an attempt to freeze and mount some part of the scholarly process for display. The Web opens the workshop windows to disseminate scholarship as it happens, erasing the artificial distinction between process and product.
More:
http://www.nature.com/nature/journal/v495/n7442/full/495437a.html
  • Topic Stats
  • Top Replies
  • Link to this Topic
Type: Question • Score: 3 • Views: 571 • Replies: 4
No top replies

 
View best answer, chosen by oristarA
InfraBlue
 
  2  
Reply Sun 31 Mar, 2013 11:10 am
@oristarA,
The writer is being figurative when he says "the Web opens the workshop windows." He's likening the dissemination of scholarship through the Web like air flowing through a window. He's contrasting the Web with the scholarly article which he asserts was (it's interesting that he uses the past tense. What, aren't scholarly articles written any more?) an attempt to freeze and mount some part of the scholarly process for display.
MontereyJack
  Selected Answer
 
  2  
Reply Sun 31 Mar, 2013 11:31 am
It's saying there were two phases of research work before the web: the process of doing the research and writing it up, and then the second part--everything required to get it into print--the submission to a journal, the editorial process of deciding to publish it, the submission to peers for review, their comments and possible revisions based on them (maybe several rounds), the actual editiong into a printable form, the actual printing, and the distribution of the journal (each stage of which can take months, sometimes rising to years). But putting it on line reduces that whole second part, after the research process, to a single click of a button. (of course it can also mean that there's no check before everyone sees it that the data were good, the methodology was sound, and the analysis made sense. Now that all has to come after it's online, and some research can turn out to be bogus as a result). It gets there much quicker, but there are fewer checks on its validity.
oristarA
 
  1  
Reply Sun 31 Mar, 2013 09:21 pm
@MontereyJack,
MontereyJack wrote:

It's saying there were two phases of research work before the web: the process of doing the research and writing it up, and then the second part--everything required to get it into print--the submission to a journal, the editorial process of deciding to publish it, the submission to peers for review, their comments and possible revisions based on them (maybe several rounds), the actual editiong into a printable form, the actual printing, and the distribution of the journal (each stage of which can take months, sometimes rising to years). But putting it on line reduces that whole second part, after the research process, to a single click of a button. (of course it can also mean that there's no check before everyone sees it that the data were good, the methodology was sound, and the analysis made sense. Now that all has to come after it's online, and some research can turn out to be bogus as a result). It gets there much quicker, but there are fewer checks on its validity.


Cool.

I wonder whether "that" above equals to "whether" in meaning.
0 Replies
 
oristarA
 
  1  
Reply Sun 31 Mar, 2013 09:24 pm
@InfraBlue,

Thank you InfraBlue.
IMHO, the past tense particularly denotes an era (of paper) has gone.
0 Replies
 
 

Related Topics

Is this comma splice? Is it proper? - Question by DaveCoop
Is this sentence grammatically correct? - Question by Sydney-Strock
Is the second "playing needed? - Question by tanguatlay
should i put "that" here ? - Question by Chen Ta
Unbeknownst to me - Question by kuben123
alternative way - Question by Nousher Ahmed
Could check my grammar mistakes please? - Question by LonelyGamer
 
  1. Forums
  2. » Could you describe the part in red with more details?
Copyright © 2024 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.05 seconds on 05/08/2024 at 09:32:48