How can we be sure that all religions are wrong?

@think rethink,

You cannot "prefer" what you don't know !...(so obvious)

@Fil Albuquerque,

i prefer, to embrace the

"fact"

that i cannot possibly know

@think rethink,

You see my general point was that ignorance, confusion, being lost in an endless see of unfathomable complexity, is the ACTUAL problem, not good and evil, right or wrong...

People that intend to harm are themselves hurt n lost. They are not evil they need healing. Same goes for dysfunctional groups and societies...

The all good vs evil thing is itself a symptom on how pseudo atheistic secular thinking is far from mature...with or without religion ppl keep using reductionist symbolism just the same to justify endless complexity they don't want to deal with...

0 Replies

@think rethink,

...and how do you know that ? You just contradicted yourself once more...

...perhaps we do know "all" that there is to know in the wrong order with the wrong timing...how rich an experience it is !

I am the "collective", and the collective it is "me" !
(I express the collective through "myself" !)

0 Replies

Not knowing all, to know something, can perhaps, be itself the knowledge, that a collective needs povs n focus in such things like "myself's"...

...all that there is to be know through "me" and all the "myself's" around "me", is, are, done ! Wink

0 Replies

My knowing, not knowing, knows...its being !
Doubt is knowledge, from "things", made thing !

"I" doubt, therefore, "I" arse !

0 Replies

@think rethink,

Quote:

i prefer, to embrace the

"fact"

that i cannot possibly know

"Claim a limitation, and sure enough, it's yours."

-Richard Bach

1 Reply

@Leadfoot,

love this one, thanks so much

0 Replies

@reasoning logic,

We can't, but we can tell that the chances that they are all wrong are quite high.

1 Reply

@LaceyParson,

LaceyParson wrote:

We can't, but we can tell that the chances that they are all wrong are quite high.

Welcome to a2k.
Why?

1 Reply

@neologist,

neologist wrote:

LaceyParson wrote:
We can't, but we can tell that the chances that they are all wrong are quite high.
Welcome to a2k.
Why?

Good question, Neo.

1 Reply

@Frank Apisa,

All religions are a percentage right if ya made one up it would still be a percentage right I dont see how you could be onehundred percent wrong. Why because everthing is made of god or nonlocality. Everything in existance is relative so if you wrote down a word and called it that word holy you couldnt be wrong because everything in its way is part of god and is therefor holy.

1 Reply

@XXSpadeMasterXX,

ggg

1 Reply

@godisagreatgod888,

The difference in difference is the nonlocal cause and enjoyer of change and that includes change in dna. Difference or relativeness is at the root of change and is the enjoyer of the event as consciousness. The enjoyer and changer exists beond death and uses death for changing changing things. But there is no death because death is the differents where accounts are settled by difference.

0 Replies

@martinies,

martinies wrote:

All religions are a percentage right if ya made one up it would still be a percentage right I dont see how you could be onehundred percent wrong. Why because everthing is made of god or nonlocality. Everything in existance is relative so if you wrote down a word and called it that word holy you couldnt be wrong because everything in its way is part of god and is therefor holy.

In New Jersey, some would say, "I gotcha 'nonlocality'" rat heah! (While pointing at one's crotch, naturally.)

I wouldn't...although I wish there were someone else from New Jersey around to say it right now.

1 Reply

@Frank Apisa,

As you may know frank the kingdom of heaven is strange something and nothing all at one but nonlocality describes it as much as can be done in the local circumstance. New Jersey n all.

0 Replies

I do find it hilarious that before quantum mechanics if someone asked where God is and you answered - "He is invisible, beyond space and time, can be in all places at all times and can bring about everything from nothing" you would be dismissed as a lunatic.

Now, the most leading edge physicists cannot deny the possibility that it is all possible.

1 Reply

@Leadfoot,

I've never known a physicist of any stripe to claim that it was impossible. That's a strawman. With QM in particular, probabilities predominate. The probability that your particular Abrahamic god is real is no greater than that for Quetzalcoatl or Zeus, considering the absolute lack of evidence for either.

2 Replies

@FBM,

Zeus and god are local names or labels. Nonlocality can be described in local terms only as the nonmoving thing or difference in moving changing things that prexisted the local difference in changing moving things. God is the nonchanging thing in the difference in local things. Or god is the omni present difference in difference that does not move but caused difference. The omni neutral thing in difference that caused the difference. Relativity

0 Replies

According to Spinoza 'religion' and 'God' are two different ball games. Since this thread is ostensibly about 'religions', we should perhaps bear in mind Spinoza's argument that they are extensive products of 'the imagination' conceived to give psychological comfort, and reinforce social control.
On this view, questions about the 'existence of God' are irrelevant.... questions neatly dismissed by Spinoza with his dictum that 'God IS existence'.

3 Replies

How can we be sure that all religions are wrong?

Related Topics

Quick Links

My Account

able2know