128
   

How can we be sure that all religions are wrong?

 
 
ehBeth
 
  1  
Fri 2 Oct, 2015 02:02 pm
@Leadfoot,
Leadfoot wrote:

Quote:
The study was to determine if there was an effect from participation in religious activities.

That's it.

If you don't think the writers and the average reader of that study


the authors and average readers of the study are academics - not general members of the public. The academics understand what the research was about and what the results were.
0 Replies
 
Leadfoot
 
  0  
Fri 2 Oct, 2015 02:20 pm
@ehBeth,
Quote:
Few people confuse participation in religious activities with belief in god/s.

ehBeth, may I introduce you to FBM.. He is far from alone.
ehBeth
 
  2  
Fri 2 Oct, 2015 02:29 pm
@Leadfoot,
If FBM doesn't know the difference between believing in god/s and participating in religious activities I'll be quite surprised.
InfraBlue
 
  0  
Fri 2 Oct, 2015 03:25 pm
@ehBeth,
ehBeth wrote:

The purpose of the study was well defined.

Belief in god/s was not part of the study.

This is irrelevant to the definition of the word "belief."
FBM
 
  2  
Fri 2 Oct, 2015 03:34 pm
@Leadfoot,
Leadfoot wrote:

Quote:
The study was to determine if there was an effect from participation in religious activities.

That's it.

If you don't think the writers and the average reader of that study associated 'participation in religious activities' with a belief in God, you are kidding yourself.


If you think you're able to read the minds of the writers and "average" readers of that study, you're the one who's kidding himself. Speak for yourself.

And I notice you skipped over this little gem in order to keep your red herring going:

FBM wrote:

People have various takes on the connations of words. No news there. What does any of this have to do with whether or not your god hypothesis has any rational (read: empirical + necessary inference) support? Whether or not this thing/entity even exists? Smells like a red herring to me.
0 Replies
 
FBM
 
  2  
Fri 2 Oct, 2015 03:38 pm
@ehBeth,
ehBeth wrote:

If FBM doesn't know the difference between believing in god/s and participating in religious activities I'll be quite surprised.


So would I. He's setting up a straw man to facilitate his red herring. The study shows that fewer and fewer young people are falling for the Bronze Age myths. That seems to scare LF and the best he can come up with is this fabricated issue about semantics. Weak.
0 Replies
 
ehBeth
 
  2  
Fri 2 Oct, 2015 03:44 pm
@InfraBlue,
the point was that the purpose of the study was defined - it was about religiosity/religious practice - not belief in god/s
Leadfoot
 
  0  
Fri 2 Oct, 2015 03:56 pm
I will let A2K readers who have follwed this and other threads decide for themselves what positions we all have taken. Did too - did not back & forth is a waste of time.
Glennn
 
  3  
Fri 2 Oct, 2015 04:04 pm
@Leadfoot,
Quote:
Did too - did not back & forth is a waste of time.

Is not. Laughing
0 Replies
 
ehBeth
 
  2  
Fri 2 Oct, 2015 04:09 pm
@Leadfoot,
Leadfoot wrote:

I will let A2K readers who have follwed this and other threads decide for themselves what positions we all have taken.


it's likely best if people express their positions rather than let others miscommunicate them <as noted above by FBM>
Leadfoot
 
  0  
Fri 2 Oct, 2015 04:25 pm
@ehBeth,
Quote:
it's likely best if people express their positions rather than let others miscommunicate them <as noted above by FBM>

Ummm... That's what I said. If they followed the threads and read our own words, they have heard our previously expressed positions.

Unless you are suggesting you want to change yours now ...
0 Replies
 
InfraBlue
 
  1  
Fri 2 Oct, 2015 04:51 pm
@ehBeth,
Thank you for clarifying your point.

I don't see, however, how you tie that in with the definition of the word "religious," seeing as how the study doesn't define the word, contrary to your assertion.
0 Replies
 
Fil Albuquerque
 
  0  
Mon 5 Oct, 2015 07:32 am
@InfraBlue,
Is what you get when you dancing on the celling !
[youtube]https://www.google.pt/url?sa=t&source=web&rct=j&url=&ved=0CBsQ8TUwAGoVChMIz7uUqLiryAIVAnU-Ch0EOAWi&usg=AFQjCNF1sHlk2z9QIx28jtvfnGP_UlkifA&sig2=_h6MV4qM3MPXa49K2djfog[/youtube]
0 Replies
 
Fil Albuquerque
 
  1  
Mon 5 Oct, 2015 10:03 am
@InfraBlue,
InfraBlue wrote:

What is a feeling anyway?

Let me fix that for you:
0 Replies
 
think rethink
 
  1  
Sat 10 Oct, 2015 09:23 am
@reasoning logic,
why would it matter?
0 Replies
 
think rethink
 
  1  
Sat 10 Oct, 2015 10:16 am
@reasoning logic,
should God exist, he is still the most crooked wicked criminal to ever be,

heaven? based on his atrocities, one can predict him to punish the religiously righteous, just for the sake of cruelty and wickedness,

i wouldn't trust god with a rotten penny.

hell? not in your control the slightest bit,
he cannot punish you ,since it's gonna be a beating,

a beating?

nothing you can do to appease him, following his dictates, won't provide an iota of protection,

not with this wicked monster, disappointing you the devotee, is way more fun then just keeping his word to the atheist.

neologist
 
  4  
Sat 10 Oct, 2015 11:11 am
@think rethink,
Thanks for a well researched and scholarly post.
0 Replies
 
Fil Albuquerque
 
  3  
Sat 10 Oct, 2015 12:05 pm
@think rethink,
I am for all practical purposes, an atheist, but your pot shot "nature is bad cause I can't grasp complexity" is laughable !
0 Replies
 
Frank Apisa
 
  2  
Sat 10 Oct, 2015 01:22 pm
@think rethink,
think rethink wrote:

should God exist, he is still the most crooked wicked criminal to ever be,

heaven? based on his atrocities, one can predict him to punish the religiously righteous, just for the sake of cruelty and wickedness,

i wouldn't trust god with a rotten penny.

hell? not in your control the slightest bit,
he cannot punish you ,since it's gonna be a beating,

a beating?

nothing you can do to appease him, following his dictates, won't provide an iota of protection,

not with this wicked monster, disappointing you the devotee, is way more fun then just keeping his word to the atheist.




You seem to be fixating on the cartoon god of the Bible.

Do you have anything to say about gods in general?

Do you think gods are not possible?

Do you discount any possibility that what we human call "the universe" was brought into existence by something that existed before it did?

Just wondering.
najmelliw
 
  1  
Sat 10 Oct, 2015 01:41 pm
It is hard to find something positive to say about Religions in general. It's all too easy to point out lots of backward thinking, strife and discrimination that can all be laid at the feet of the major world Religions.

I suppose one thing that religion does though is give hope, although that is for each 'believing' person to determine for themselves. It's a pretty powerful concept, hope. It shouldn't be discarded as trivial or non-consequential. Perhaps religion can also allow 'believers' to have a bit of control over their destiny, by means of certain rituals.
0 Replies
 
 

Related Topics

 
Copyright © 2024 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 3.83 seconds on 12/24/2024 at 12:52:05