@reasoning logic,
I don't know. I'm not atheist but I can get along with atheist. I feel that religions and religious people are making me weak, and the religion itself personally is a strong advantage, to have a communion with God.
Um...my best friend growing up was atheist. shrugs.
I don't know, it's stop being hypocrites, they can't have this religion and have the World too and not give me the World too unfortunately. I don't care about it.
I don't care about their worldly affairs when this is their stated religion. I just don't care is what they really need to find out, where concerns religion and the World. If they weren't hypocrites I might care. But soon they will find out I just want to be left out of it all.
It almost seems hardly worth it and it almost seems, well it really seems like the point of Religion is to be without proof either way. But what would happen if you totally debunked a central myth though????? You see? Yes...yes you can disprove a religion that way I think, though the point or the common stance is that religion cannot be proven/disproven so as to say they are all wrong or all right...yea. I mean I think then either they are all wrong or all right. I think that's what people say anyway.
But what happens if you disprove one or two by virtue of debunking a myth; Say I figured out something linguistically that disproves a myth? What if I debunked a central myth, a central person or figure? then does another become more true than the rest? Now isn't that a bad thing for atheists?
Stop doing The World if you're doing Religion. sighs. seriously though. unless you're like, the Indian caste system. Even then you have to be Vedic if you're going to be religion.
please leave me alone, everyone that knows me.
I debunked a central myth of a world religion, and then sort of discredited a another one, and it was just like, I stopped writing.
I also debunked a scientific institution to be fair.
Weeell, alright, I'm outta here.