128
   

How can we be sure that all religions are wrong?

Forums: Religion, Philosophy, Psychology, Humor, Fact Is True
Email this Topic • Print this Page
 
 
anonymously99stwin
 
  1  
Mon 13 Jan, 2014 02:07 pm
@timur,
Quote:
timur wrote: "Franck cannot understand this simple statement:
"I have neither use nor need for gods".."


I'm not sure why the statement would be brought up. That itself makes no sense.
timur
 
  2  
Mon 13 Jan, 2014 02:09 pm
@anonymously99stwin,
Franck's position is senseless, let alone yours..
anonymously99stwin
 
  1  
Mon 13 Jan, 2014 02:17 pm
@timur,
Is that why you visited me last night?
timur
 
  1  
Mon 13 Jan, 2014 02:23 pm
@anonymously99stwin,
I'd me in pain to do so if such was my inclination.

I'm not a ghost yet..
anonymously99stwin
 
  1  
Mon 13 Jan, 2014 02:25 pm
@timur,
Why would you want to haunt me? Wink
timur
 
  1  
Mon 13 Jan, 2014 02:32 pm
@anonymously99stwin,
Well, I wouldn't.

I can imagine things a lot more enticing to haunt..
0 Replies
 
fresco
 
  1  
Mon 13 Jan, 2014 02:39 pm
@anonymously99stwin,
Quote:
Fresco. How would you feel if I said I believed you have a golden halo hovering above your head and a red tail with an arrow at the end attached to your rear end?


I would feel that I was correct in my decision to have you on"ignore".
0 Replies
 
fresco
 
  1  
Mon 13 Jan, 2014 02:44 pm
@timur,
Timur wrote
Quote:
Franck cannot understand this simple statement:

"I have neither use nor need for gods"..


To be fair Frank can understand the statement, but not its major implications for the meaning of words like "existence" and "reality" which are essentially predicated on "what matters to particular humans at moments in history".
0 Replies
 
Frank Apisa
 
  -1  
Mon 13 Jan, 2014 02:44 pm
@fresco,
fresco wrote:

Quote:
Explain to me how "There are no gods" is anything but a blind guess?

State what might constitute the universally definitive "evidence" for "the existence of a god". You can't and nor can anybody else !
The consequence is that the statement "God exists" is absolutely correct for believers with or without what they might consider to be "evidence". The corollary "there are no gods for atheists" is absolutely correct for those have no requirement for the concept of a nebulous divinity." Guessing" does not come into it and no amount of vacuous wittering about "the true nature of reality" which is even more nebulous than "a God concept" is going to allow for the word "guess" to be appropriate. You are stuck in an infinite regress of vacuous semantic platitudes.





Get over yourself, Fresco...and when you get a chance...explain why "There are no gods" is not a blind guess.
0 Replies
 
Frank Apisa
 
  1  
Mon 13 Jan, 2014 02:45 pm
@timur,
timur wrote:

Franck cannot understand this simple statement:

"I have neither use nor need for gods"..


I can understand that with no trouble at all.

Not sure why you had to pretend I would have any trouble with it.

But why don't you try the question I've asked Fresco?
0 Replies
 
Frank Apisa
 
  1  
Mon 13 Jan, 2014 02:45 pm
@timur,
timur wrote:

Franck's position is senseless, let alone yours..


There is nothing senseless about my position...or my question.

anonymously99stwin
 
  1  
Mon 13 Jan, 2014 02:48 pm
@Frank Apisa,
Timur's jealous of you Frank Apisa.

And fresco is continuously arguing with himself.
0 Replies
 
timur
 
  1  
Mon 13 Jan, 2014 02:56 pm
Anomalously wrote:
Timur's jealous of you Frank Apisa.


What is there to be jealous of?
0 Replies
 
timur
 
  1  
Mon 13 Jan, 2014 02:57 pm

Timur wrote:
Franck cannot understand this simple statement:

"I have neither use nor need for gods"..


Franck wrote:
I can understand that with no trouble at all.


and then wrote:
explain why "There are no gods" is not a blind guess.


It just tells me that my first statement stands.

You don't understand that there's his no guess, let alone blind guess.

Your logic is not mine, we are not on the same perception level.

And I find yours lacking substance and thought.

But as you say, what is..is..(even though it makes no sense to me).
fresco
 
  2  
Mon 13 Jan, 2014 02:59 pm
@Frank Apisa,
Quote:
There is nothing senseless about my position...or my question.


Of course it's senseless. The word "guess" is being inappropriately used like in a statement such as "golf is boring, is just a blind guess".
anonymously99stwin
 
  1  
Mon 13 Jan, 2014 02:59 pm
@timur,
How do you know he's not messing with you?
timur
 
  1  
Mon 13 Jan, 2014 03:01 pm
@anonymously99stwin,
What about if he is?
anonymously99stwin
 
  1  
Mon 13 Jan, 2014 03:06 pm
@timur,
I'm following you.
timur
 
  1  
Mon 13 Jan, 2014 03:07 pm
@anonymously99stwin,
Why are you doing so?
0 Replies
 
Frank Apisa
 
  1  
Mon 13 Jan, 2014 03:14 pm
@timur,
timur wrote:


Timur wrote:
Franck cannot understand this simple statement:

"I have neither use nor need for gods"..


Franck wrote:
I can understand that with no trouble at all.


and then wrote:
explain why "There are no gods" is not a blind guess.


It just tells me that my first statement stands.

You don't understand that there's his no guess, let alone blind guess.

Your logic is not mine, we are not on the same perception level.

And I find yours lacking substance and thought.

But as you say, what is..is..(even though it makes no sense to me).



Your first statement has nothing to do with someone saying, "There are no gods."

I do understand that a person saying "There are no gods"...IS MAKING A BLIND GUESS.

You apparently do not.

Logic is logic.

If you find what I say to be lacking in thought and substance...avoid it. I do not find your logic lacking in thought and substance...and because I disagree with you on some things, I do not feel disposed to pretend I do.

Sorry that the statement "What IS...IS" makes no sense to you.

It makes lots of sense.
 

Related Topics

What if no religions are correct, but there still is a God? - Question by neologist
We are all like little children who often say: "Mom, Dad, leave me alone, I want to be on my own". - Question by Leaffan
Beyond tribalism; How well does your religious label serve you? - Discussion by MattDavis
Is religion responsible for the opposition to peace in the Israel-Palestine conflict? - Question by maxdancona
Concern for Religious Freedom or Preaching Political Messages? - Discussion by wandeljw
Why People Seek Solace In Gods. - Question by mark noble
Catholic remarried couples should abstain from sex - Question by Tes yeux noirs
How can a good God allow suffering - Question by SawyerMentink
Religion and Fear - Discussion by TomTomBinks
Does the Bible's account allow for living things to change over time? - Question by anthony1312002
 
  1. Forums
  2. » How can we be sure that all religions are wrong?
  3. » Page 39
Copyright © 2024 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.06 seconds on 05/06/2024 at 10:30:02
▲ ▼