Make no mistake I speak as I think on the spot and I am very proud of it. I deduce and induce in my mind way before I get to Youtube or Wikipedia or anywhere else. I get to the same conclusions many others do way before I knew others thought alike. None of that does invalidate my arguments, quite on the contrary it makes them more valuable and honest.
That out of the way if you have a counter please deliver!
I am well aware that this argument, MY argument, is a head shot into Idealism.
That's how good it is and I am no fool to not be aware of the quality of my reasoning when it is there. Such that it takes more then some old folk with a PHD to put me down. I have wreck havoc in many debates at University and I would gladly face any so called expert on television or social media to let well clear in direct discourse who knows what!
So again, for you and others if you have counters please sum them up in plain English and bring it on!