@Glennn,
Quote:Here you are once again demonstrating that you operate on pure assumption, as I am neither a woman nor an adulterer.
Oh no!
This is too much!
Now it happens that I was discussing with a transgender!
Buorph! Buorph! Buorph! Arghhhhh! ...sh*t!...
Quote:But please continue. As I said, you're an interesting case.
Funny thing in forums is the participation of people who play to be Psychologists studying other participants.
Before touching the other topic, where you clearly still can't see by glorious ignorance of the English language and its rich and extensive application of the different meaning of words, I will show you how to debate.
You can read the excellent way many of guys here debate several topics and I really admire their style, which in many of them, specially the ones who are in opposition to my opinions, provide solid arguments in their favor, and they write them with elegant and well edited style, contrary to my vulgar and simplistic way of expressing my points.
You lack of experience when debating.
Your posture is the attack and attack of my points without providing any valid and solid alternative from your part.
You are obfuscated in attacking the killing of the adulterous woman as a punishment. That is your only argument.
Then, as a debater you are just a zero on the left, because you are not giving alternatives.
A good debater presents the other side.
This is to say, you should provide your point of what should be the punishment for the adulterous woman.
Read your messages. Pure attacks, and attacks, and attacks, and really... it sounds sick, it appears that those persisting shooting of words you made come from a child having a gun who have not any control of the aim.
So, stop for a while your studying about me and post what -according to you- should be the punishment for the adulterous woman.