@JTT,
JTT wrote:Is Heath's name used in the same fashion as Godlberg's, C?
Heath Robinson's name. I would say yes. Their drawing styles are somewhat similar. I don't know if this applies to Goldberg, but if a commentator used "Heath Robinsonish" about real-world physical machines or to business, political or administrative arrangements, a critical nuance
might be intended - that the contrived thing was ramshackle, put together in haste, employed elements not intended (or suitable) to work together, etc. Also
maybe that the thing was more for show (Heath Robinson was a visual artist) than function, perhaps to bamboozle the uninitiated with complexity (see snake oil, medicine shows, etc).
That is not to say that a comparison with Robinson's work might not sometimes carry praise: bolting something together out of scrap angle iron and bits and pieces of redundant machinery to save money compared with buying new is something farmers, etc often do.