1
   

Gore Will Not Run For White House In 2004

 
 
Reply Sun 15 Dec, 2002 04:55 pm
Al Gore has decided not to run for the Presidency in 2004. This leaves the field open for a number of contenders for the Democratic nomination:

Link to Strory about Gore not Running for the Presidency in 2004

A number of people have been mentioned as possible choices. Whom do YOU think has the best chance of winning the nomination, and possibly the presidency, in 2004?
  • Topic Stats
  • Top Replies
  • Link to this Topic
Type: Discussion • Score: 1 • Views: 1,549 • Replies: 10
No top replies

 
jespah
 
  1  
Reply Sun 15 Dec, 2002 05:13 pm
I voted for Kerry but if McCain switches parties he'd be the best choice.
0 Replies
 
roger
 
  1  
Reply Sun 15 Dec, 2002 05:22 pm
Oh, but I wish Gore would run. Barring that, McCain would make a dandy candidate. Of course, I'm not a Democrate.
0 Replies
 
PDiddie
 
  1  
Reply Sun 15 Dec, 2002 07:29 pm
Gen. Wesley Clark, assuming he IS a dem.
0 Replies
 
perception
 
  1  
Reply Sun 15 Dec, 2002 07:45 pm
I think the Dems will decide on a fresh start with new blood which
John Edwards will exhibit----not a tired old horse like Kerry.

Lieberman should switch parties---he's sounds more like a wise old republican than most old republicans.

Bush must revive the economy, bring in the heads of UBL and Saddam or he's dead in the water.
0 Replies
 
Equus
 
  1  
Reply Mon 16 Dec, 2002 11:08 am
I'd prefer Gephardt, but Representatives are not as likely to run as Senators. That 2-year term is problematic for Representatives.
0 Replies
 
Lightwizard
 
  1  
Reply Mon 16 Dec, 2002 11:25 am
It's a possibility that John McCain will switch parties and run -- right now, he'd get my vote. Liberman could decide to run because of Al Gore's capitulation but Kerry has the most support within the party. It may come down to, once again, it's not good enough to win, others must fail.
0 Replies
 
stanlen
 
  1  
Reply Mon 16 Dec, 2002 12:29 pm
Gore's withdrawal comes as unpleasant news to the Republicans.
I would like to see a young attractive candidate seize the moment.
In fact most anybody but Sen. Clinton.
0 Replies
 
williamhenry3
 
  1  
Reply Mon 16 Dec, 2002 01:10 pm
As perception has posted already, the Democrats need a new face, someone who might be able to swing some white voters of the Old South.
(The African-American vote will certainly be for the Democrat, since Dubya carried only 9 per cent of that vote in 2000.)

It seems that that the best new face, one the voters have not already seen two million times, is John Edwards.
0 Replies
 
BillW
 
  1  
Reply Tue 17 Dec, 2002 12:24 pm
It is up in the air. It may still be Gore, I too would vote for McCain!
0 Replies
 
Porfavor
 
  1  
Reply Tue 17 Dec, 2002 04:14 pm
I can't say this news is disappointing to me but I can't wait for a couple of good young ones here in Mn to make a run at it.
0 Replies
 
 

Related Topics

Obama '08? - Discussion by sozobe
Let's get rid of the Electoral College - Discussion by Robert Gentel
McCain's VP: - Discussion by Cycloptichorn
Food Stamp Turkeys - Discussion by H2O MAN
The 2008 Democrat Convention - Discussion by Lash
McCain is blowing his election chances. - Discussion by McGentrix
Snowdon is a dummy - Discussion by cicerone imposter
TEA PARTY TO AMERICA: NOW WHAT?! - Discussion by farmerman
 
  1. Forums
  2. » Gore Will Not Run For White House In 2004
Copyright © 2024 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.03 seconds on 04/23/2024 at 04:08:34