1
   

Molly Ivins: Crooked Liars & Other Bush Screw-ups

 
 
Reply Fri 19 Mar, 2004 11:03 am
Ya just gotta love Molly Ivins---she's so smart and so funny.---BBB

Crooked liars
Molly Ivins - Creators Syndicate
03.18.04

AUSTIN, Texas -- My, we are off to an elegant start here, aren't we?

First, we have John Kerry in a classic open-mike gaffe referring to his Republican opponents as "crooked" and "lying." While this was not a high point in the history of political rhetoric, Kerry's refusal to apologize for the overhead remark promptly solidified his base.

"Hey, he's got more guts than I thought," said many a pleased Democrat, convinced the Bushies are all liars and crooks. So he is now free to go forth and talk of health care.

Naturally, the Republicans postured in comically pretend outrage and demanded an apology. The indictment brought back happy memories of the Bush open-mike gaffe in 2000, in which he called a reporter "an asshole" and then refused to apologize. But we are now on Election Year Double Standard Time, a time zone in which your side lies constantly and my side is noble, true and brave -- except for those moments when the other side's despicable conduct forces our side to get tough, too.

On the Republican side, we are already seeing the first negative ads from the Bushies, and they are indeed misleading attacks on Kerry's credentials on defense and the military. Of the numerous misrepresentations in the ads, I find particularly annoying the claim that Kerry voted to cut combat pay for soldiers. In fact, as the public record abundantly proves, it was the Bush administration that proposed to cut combat pay for soldiers in both Afghanistan and Iraq by $75 a month for imminent danger pay and by another $150 for family separation allowance. The administration backed down because of public outcry.

But we should expect negative ads to be misleading: The question in politics is always: "Are they working?" Apparently. Kerry has fired back by somberly deploring negative ads -- that could become a helpful theme, but it's rarely an exciting strategy, unless you do an ad saying, "Liar, liar, pants on fire," which somehow doesn't seem dignified enough. Besides, Ben Cohen of Vermont is already toting a large statue of Bush with his pants on fire around the country.

Then we had the incident of Kerry saying more leaders (abroad) are rooting for his election and the hilarious reaction by Bushies pretending to be outraged and demanding that he name names. Now that was splendid political farce, and anyone who failed to appreciate it is just not going to have a good time this year.

It is so obvious foreign leaders favor anyone over Bush, it's painful. A year ago, I quoted Fareed Zakaria's observation in Newsweek: "I've been all over the world in the last year, and almost every country I've visited felt humiliated by this administration." Jorge Casteneda, the former foreign minister of Mexico, told him: "Most officials in Latin countries today are not anti-American types. We have studied in the United States or worked there. We like and understand America. But we find it extremely irritating to be treated with utter contempt." The only foreign leader I can think of who would prefer Bush to Kerry is Ariel Sharon, to whom Bush has been perfectly compliant.

The problem is that George W. Bush has truly bad manners. At the recent Summit of the Americas summit in Mexico, he could not have possibly been more visibly bored. The bullying that led up to the Iraq War -- particularly ugly in the case of Turkey, which will come back to haunt us -- made him unpopular all over the world.

But there were the Bushies, haughtily demanding that Kerry back up his statement as though it were not painfully obvious to every dimwit in the nation. And that, in turn, led to the unfortunate demand from President Bush that Kerry ought to back up what he said with facts. Ooops.

Dick Cheney piped right up as though he had any credibility left, and Bush's press guy Scott McClellan capped it off by saying, "Either he is straightforward and states who they are, or the only conclusion one can draw is that he is making it up to attack the president."

This, of course, brought up the entire litany of lies, deceptions and misleading by the administration, leading to many a happy reprise from the left. California Rep. Henry Waxman's office helpfully located 237 whoppers on Iraq alone from major Bush players: That's www.house.gov/reform/min, in case anyone needs a handy reference.

On the other hand, nice opportunity for Karl Rove to play to American xenophobia -- fear of foreigners. In fact, there's a nice little sleeper issue developing on the right: a big anti-immigration stink, partly set off by Bush's own green card plan, which is the reason he's backed down off that. Nothing like an election year to remind us how complicated this country is.

So far, I still think the most striking thing about this election is how united the Democrats are. I've never seen anything like it. On the other hand, as E.J. Dionne notes in his new book, "Stand Up Fight Back," it's not enough to fight hard. You have to fight smart.
-----------------------------
(c) 2004 Creators Syndicate
URL: http://www.workingforchange.com/article.cfm?itemid=16614
  • Topic Stats
  • Top Replies
  • Link to this Topic
Type: Discussion • Score: 1 • Views: 497 • Replies: 2
No top replies

 
McGentrix
 
  1  
Reply Fri 19 Mar, 2004 11:19 am
Huh. I fail to see the funny part. seems like typical leftist smut.
0 Replies
 
BumbleBeeBoogie
 
  1  
Reply Sat 20 Mar, 2004 11:16 am
Pass me some of that aspirin, please
Posted on Thu, Mar. 18, 2004
Pass me some of that aspirin, please
By Molly Ivins - Creators Syndicate

AUSTIN - How much fun can one administration have? More dead GIs. New record trade deficit. Stock market plunges. Ally in Spain goes down to defeat. The new Spanish prime minister says the occupation in Iraq is a "continuing disaster," and he's pulling his troops out.

Still no jobs. And then the guy who was supposed to be the new jobs czar turns out to have laid off 75 of his own workers in 2002 and then built a $3 million factory in China to employ 180 Chinese that same year.

Whoever has the aspirin concession at the White House must be making a fortune.

The unfortunate matter of the would-be jobs czar came at a particularly awkward moment. More than six months ago, President Bush promised to appoint a "manufacturing czar" at the Commerce Department. As the Center for American Progress points out, since then we've lost another 250,000 manufacturing jobs.

Bush was on his way to Ohio last week, where the economy has just been hemorrhaging jobs, to "focus on jobs." He actually claimed, "We're creating jobs -- good, high-paying jobs for the American citizen."

The guy is living on some parallel planet. Bush chose Anthony Raimondo, CEO of a manufacturing company in Nebraska, to be the jobs czar, which would have worked out better if Raimondo hadn't just outsourced 180 jobs to China. The Web site the Daily Misleader found a truly impressive convergence between Bush's top campaign contributors and the corporations that have outsourced the most jobs abroad.

Here's the catch. Even if the globalizers are right, and outsourcing every manufacturing job in America is a terrific idea, what does it take to get the "good, high-paying jobs" that Bush claims they're creating?

In theory, the new jobs will be "brain jobs" in biotechnology and other forms of advanced applied science, plus the creative fields, and for that you need scientists, entrepreneurs, creative people and intellectuals. Basically, everybody Bush doesn't like.

He's shown so much favoritism to the big corporations that I don't see how he can claim to like even entrepreneurs.

He's consistently replaced scientists on all kinds of government advisory boards with religious activists. He ignores scientific reports indicating that his various policies either don't work or are actually harmful. This White House has changed and rewritten reports made by government scientists, particularly in the area of the environment. Bush kissed off biotechnology with the stem cell research decision.

Apparently he hates Hollywood. We know he doesn't like intellectuals, and he's not in favor of green technology because he continues to subsidize extractive and polluting industries with tax breaks. How do they ever expect this thing to work?

They apparently think they can just lie about it. Last month, Bush released a personally signed report claiming that his economic plan would create 2.6 million jobs. Then he had to "distance himself," as they say in Washington, from that absurdity. Labor Secretary Elaine Chao appeared before Congress last week to claim that Bush never actually signed the report.

Their contempt for government means they just don't govern well. What can you say about an administration that threatens to fire people if they tell the truth to Congress?

The latest example of this charming policy is the case of Richard Foster, chief actuary at the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services. The Knight Ridder News Service reported in an exclusive that Foster's boss at the time, Thomas Scully, wrote "a direct order not to respond to certain requests and instead to provide the responses to him and warned about the consequences of insubordination."

What Scully was sitting on was the rather pertinent information that Foster's cost estimates on that stinking prescription drug bill were $100 billion higher than Congress was willing to go. You may recall that the prescription drug bill passed the House on a 220-215 vote after the R's held the vote open for three hours.

Many R's were unhappy with the bill and vowed not to vote for it if it cost more than $400 billion in the first 10 years. Foster had a whole series of estimates that put the bill at more than $500 billion. In January, the White House said the cost would be $534 billion.

Rep. Pete Stark, D-Calif., said: "Tom Scully told my staff that Rick Foster would be 'fired so fast his head would spin' if he released this information to us." Last summer, Scully told The Associated Press: "They don't have the right on the Hill to call up my actuary and demand things. These people work for the executive branch, period."

Scully said he would release the analysis "if I feel like it." Uh, actually, "Mr. Scully's people" work for the taxpayers of this country, and so does he, and we're represented in Washington by the Congress.

We are also of the opinion that Congress writes better legislation when it has some idea -- within a hundred billion or so -- what the blasted law will cost us.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Molly Ivins writes for Creators Syndicate. 5777 W. Century Blvd., Suite 700, Los Angeles, CA 90045
0 Replies
 
 

Related Topics

Obama '08? - Discussion by sozobe
Let's get rid of the Electoral College - Discussion by Robert Gentel
McCain's VP: - Discussion by Cycloptichorn
Food Stamp Turkeys - Discussion by H2O MAN
The 2008 Democrat Convention - Discussion by Lash
McCain is blowing his election chances. - Discussion by McGentrix
Snowdon is a dummy - Discussion by cicerone imposter
TEA PARTY TO AMERICA: NOW WHAT?! - Discussion by farmerman
 
  1. Forums
  2. » Molly Ivins: Crooked Liars & Other Bush Screw-ups
Copyright © 2024 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.09 seconds on 09/30/2024 at 06:30:47