H2O MAN
 
Reply Sat 23 Feb, 2013 08:45 am


The lack of knowledge and understanding about the Three-Fifths Compromise is widespread.

Dealing with derps who believe the Constitution
said black people were only three-fifths human.
  • Topic Stats
  • Top Replies
  • Link to this Topic
Type: Discussion • Score: 1 • Views: 1,014 • Replies: 12
No top replies

 
contrex
 
  2  
Reply Sat 23 Feb, 2013 08:56 am
Straw man time again in Waterman's world...
H2O MAN
 
  0  
Reply Sat 23 Feb, 2013 08:58 am
@contrex,
Idiocracy from trexi
0 Replies
 
contrex
 
  2  
Reply Sat 23 Feb, 2013 09:08 am
H20man, can I ask you a question? Why do you spend so much time posting **** on web forums? Does your life suck that much?
H2O MAN
 
  1  
Reply Sat 23 Feb, 2013 09:10 am
@contrex,


You must be the perfect human trexi, your life must be perfect in every way...
why then do you come here and comment on subjects that you know nothing about?

Are you so insecure that you must attack others you disagree with or don't understand?
0 Replies
 
Foofie
 
  2  
Reply Sat 23 Feb, 2013 07:00 pm
For all we know, many African-Americans can be four-fourths human, since only Europeans and Asians supposedly mixed with Neanderthal. Some Europeans and Asians might then be three-fourths human; the other fourth might be Neanderthal? The percentages could be skewed for purposes of making a point.
H2O MAN
 
  0  
Reply Sat 23 Feb, 2013 07:26 pm
@Foofie,


LOL!

There is no such thing as an 'African-American', and we are all human - 100%
Foofie
 
  2  
Reply Sat 23 Feb, 2013 07:38 pm
@H2O MAN,
H2O MAN wrote:



LOL!

There is no such thing as an 'African-American', and we are all human - 100%


Let's not get bogged down in semantics; however, there is supposedly Neanderthal DNA in those of European or Asian descent. Africans don't have Neanderthal DNA. What is today called "human" is just a mutt, in my opinion, in many instances. Again in my opinion, only Africans can claim a pedigree of sorts.
H2O MAN
 
  -1  
Reply Sat 23 Feb, 2013 08:26 pm
@Foofie,


You are the one that decided to go down the semantics path... it may
surprise you to know that all forms of primitive man were in fact human.
JTT
 
  1  
Reply Sat 23 Feb, 2013 11:32 pm
@H2O MAN,
You couldn't explain it even after you've read it, h2oguy.
0 Replies
 
H2O MAN
 
  -1  
Reply Sun 24 Feb, 2013 06:47 am
Why does JTT hate blacks?
JTT
 
  1  
Reply Sun 24 Feb, 2013 10:06 am
@H2O MAN,
Quote:
Why does JTT hate blacks?


Testament to your "thought processes", h20guy.
0 Replies
 
Foofie
 
  1  
Reply Sun 24 Feb, 2013 10:13 am
@H2O MAN,
H2O MAN wrote:



You are the one that decided to go down the semantics path... it may
surprise you to know that all forms of primitive man were in fact human.


How could that surprise me? But, you are parsing words, since today anthropologists call all prior hominids human, on our evolutionary branch. However, Homo Sapiens came from Africa, and Neanderthal (another human) was in the Mid East and Europe, and a cousin of his was in Asia. And, Homo Sapien had a penchant for talking and making up words. Neanderthal, not so much. Do you like rhyming rap?
0 Replies
 
 

Related Topics

Obama '08? - Discussion by sozobe
Let's get rid of the Electoral College - Discussion by Robert Gentel
McCain's VP: - Discussion by Cycloptichorn
McCain is blowing his election chances. - Discussion by McGentrix
Food Stamp Turkeys - Discussion by H2O MAN
The 2008 Democrat Convention - Discussion by Lash
Snowdon is a dummy - Discussion by cicerone imposter
GAFFNEY: Whose side is Obama on? - Discussion by gungasnake
 
  1. Forums
  2. » three-fifths of a person?
Copyright © 2019 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.07 seconds on 12/07/2019 at 12:12:23