@Frank Apisa,
Well Frank help me out here I am a little bewildered...from two, either you believe or know, you do not know...
...in the first case if you believe it, because you may know and not be certain of what you know (there's a distinction between knowledge and certainty), then you are no better then us, and you are just playing another silly hide and seek guess game to see if you can get away with it...
...but if you do know it with certainty, then you admittedly and contradictorily know something, thus you only obscurely imply you do not know some things but not that you absolutely do not know...
....in which case you ought to clarify the special pleading regarding your state of knowledge and retreat from your absolute skepticism as you can't justify it...
...interestingly it is amusing that the image your portraying to me right know is precisely one of someone far more certain than any other guy in this thread...how about that ?
PS - Perhaps you equivocally believe you can access all that you might know or not know instantly, so that you can decide that you do simply not know, but then you wouldn't be sure of not knowing either...you would rather assume that you are not certain whether you know or not know something, which is the point of my silly yet pertinent intervention here...