1
   

Robt. Novak: Wounds of 2000 never healed for McCain

 
 
Reply Mon 15 Mar, 2004 10:21 am
Wounds of 2000 never healed for McCain
March 15, 2004
BY ROBERT NOVAK SUN-TIMES COLUMNIST Advertisement

In this winter of Republican discontent, the last thing the Grand Old Party needed last week was Sen. John McCain leaving the door open for him to be John Kerry's vice presidential running mate on the Democratic ticket. That opening was tiny, and McCain quickly had it closed with a bang. Nevertheless, the incident was disturbing to knowledgeable Republicans.

A Kerry-McCain ticket is out of the question, and nobody knows it better than McCain. Then why did he for several hours last Wednesday permit what the Associated Press described as ''a glimmer of hope'' for this unlikely combination? It reflects more than the senator's indisputable propensity for mischief-making. At a time when George W. Bush needs help and support, McCain is opposing him on a broad front of issues from tax cuts to global warming.

McCain, regarded as a nuisance by most of his Republican colleagues, in fact is the conscience of his party and the Bush administration on many questions. But he often seems more hairshirt than conscience, not hesitating to join hands with Democrats as a campaign of extraordinary partisan intensity begins. What happened last week sounded like McCain warning his intraparty adversary of 2000 that he really couldn't expect too much help from him.

McCain previously labeled as absurd interview questions about his going on the Democratic ticket, but something got into him when asked last Wednesday on ABC's ''Good Morning America'' whether he would consider becoming Kerry's running mate: ''John Kerry is a close friend of mine. We have been friends for years. Obviously, I would entertain it.''

His quick admonition that the Democrats never would seek ''a pro-life, free-trading, non-protectionist, deficit hawk'' was ignored. McCain's chief of staff Mark Salter had to be trotted out hours later to make clear that his boss was not running for vice president.

Salter could not undo all the damage. At the moment that Republican strategists are intent on unveiling Kerry to voters as the most liberal member of the Senate, the immensely popular McCain says the prospective Democratic nominee is OK. The tough 2000 primary campaign waged against McCain is cited in the Democratic mantra protesting all criticism of Kerry. McCain's refusal to talk about Kerry's long voting record against defense and intelligence spending gives aid and comfort to the political enemy.

McCain is nothing like Sen. Jim Jeffords, who long had been an apostate before leaving the party three years ago. McCain has supported Bush's war policy and is on close terms with Vice President Dick Cheney, National Security Adviser Condoleezza Rice and Deputy Secretary of State Richard Armitage. He is the GOP's better angel in exposing the congressional Republican appetite for pork.

What transforms McCain from a conscience into a hairshirt is his refusal to consider any adjustment toward party loyalty in a presidential election year. Two weeks ago, he presided over Senate hearings on his global warming bill that dovetails with the Democratic election-year agenda. Last week, he joined with Democratic senators to pass a budget amendment that would effectively rule out tax cuts. Because neither proposal has the slightest chance of becoming law, they become exercises in politics -- Democratic politics.

Worse yet is what the veterans of McCain's 2000 presidential campaign say when no reporters are around. Other Republicans have been shocked by how contemptuous they are of the president and his record.

At one recent private dinner, what the former McCain campaign operatives said was hardly distinguishable from Democratic ranting against Bush.

The hard truth is that wounds of 2000 never really have healed for John McCain. When the congressional Republican leadership is complaining about the president's inability to project any message other than the war against terrorism, McCain's ability as a Republican to reach out to America could be helpful. Notwithstanding his proclivity to cause trouble, a strong commitment to Bush would have precluded him from seeming to reach out to Kerry.
  • Topic Stats
  • Top Replies
  • Link to this Topic
Type: Discussion • Score: 1 • Views: 566 • Replies: 3
No top replies

 
Umbagog
 
  1  
Reply Mon 15 Mar, 2004 04:26 pm
Wanna make sense out of this?

Considering this:

MacCain is a REPUBLICAN. Bush is not. Bush is a NEOCON that has an ideology for all intents and purposes is identical to the Federalist party of Alexander Hamilton and John Adams. They were basically laughed out of power by 1823, but they still exist in the world, as the hierarchy of our coporate powers is the federalist ideology in all its blatantness.

There aren't many real republicans left in the republican party. Based on the votes for the Medicorp Bull, there are only about 5 % of both houses of Congress that are actually republicans standing up for republican ideology. Oddly enough, Lott is one of them. And so is MacCain.

The identical nature of federalist ideology is well understood in this country too, even though people can't seem to make the link. But they are all aware that corporate interests are strongly influencing most of government, and those interests are a hierarchy straight out of the Old World that we fought a revolution to free ourselves from.

Guess what. We need to do it again.
0 Replies
 
pistoff
 
  1  
Reply Mon 15 Mar, 2004 04:45 pm
Confusion
Republicans? The term is barely viable. Now we have Paleo-Republicans vs Neocons. GW Bush is neither.

"George W. Bush is a dullard lacking any moral constraints in his pursuit of gain, loyal to no principle save the comfort of the very rich, unburdened by any thoughtful consideration of the national interest, and a man who, on those occasions when he actually does make a correct decision, does so almost by accident."

Jonathan Chait of the New Republic

Robert Novak should be indicted for being complicit in the V. Plame outing. He was warned not to do so but his ego couldn't allow him not to scoop the story. He is either senile, stupic or both.

McCain is a confused Paleo-Conservative. He jerks back and forth in his support of the Bush Crime Family.

Once the majority of the American public smell the stench coming from the White House, which they eventually will, even though their sense of smell is quite dull, they will vote the Bushco miserable failures out.
0 Replies
 
Centroles
 
  1  
Reply Tue 16 Mar, 2004 04:01 pm
McCain previously labeled as absurd interview questions about his going on the Democratic ticket, but something got into him when asked last Wednesday on ABC's ''Good Morning America'' whether he would consider becoming Kerry's running mate: ''John Kerry is a close friend of mine. We have been friends for years. Obviously, I would entertain it.''

His quick admonition that the Democrats never would seek ''a pro-life, free-trading, non-protectionist, deficit hawk'' was ignored.

I would like nothing more than to McCain be president. I agree with him on EVERY ISSUE including the Iraq War and possibly even pro-life. I don't think abortion should be banned, but I don't mind certain limits on late term abortions are uncalled for.
0 Replies
 
 

Related Topics

Obama '08? - Discussion by sozobe
Let's get rid of the Electoral College - Discussion by Robert Gentel
McCain's VP: - Discussion by Cycloptichorn
Food Stamp Turkeys - Discussion by H2O MAN
The 2008 Democrat Convention - Discussion by Lash
McCain is blowing his election chances. - Discussion by McGentrix
Snowdon is a dummy - Discussion by cicerone imposter
TEA PARTY TO AMERICA: NOW WHAT?! - Discussion by farmerman
 
  1. Forums
  2. » Robt. Novak: Wounds of 2000 never healed for McCain
Copyright © 2024 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.03 seconds on 09/30/2024 at 10:33:17