@parados,
parados wrote:I didn't realize bums and drug addicts could pass the current required background check. If we are letting drug addicts and bums buy guns, it seems we may have a problem with the background check in its current form.
Presumably "bum" is the liberals' preferred term for demonizing the homeless??
Why should homeless people be denied their Constitutional rights?
Given their vulnerable position, homeless people may be in greater need than most people for means to defend themselves from predators.
As for drug addicts, perhaps. But if someone were to smoke a little pot on rare occasions, I don't see any case for denying them their rights.
And given the way liberals like to abuse definitions to deny people their rights, I'm sure that anyone who smoked pot one time 40 years ago would be counted as a "drug addict".
One of the most important reasons to block the expansion of the background check system is the fact that it isn't only being used to block people who shouldn't have guns. But rather, it is being abused to block large numbers of law abiding citizens.