33
   

The Gun Fight in Washington. Your opinons?

 
 
roger
 
  2  
Reply Mon 28 Jan, 2013 11:56 pm
@FBM,
Then it probably would have stopped me, as well.

EDIT: Just out of curiosity, what is the South Korean attitude on private ownership.
FBM
 
  2  
Reply Tue 29 Jan, 2013 12:03 am
@roger,
roger wrote:

Then it probably would have stopped me, as well.

EDIT: Just out of curiosity, what is the South Korean attitude on private ownership.


We can have hunting weapons, but no handguns. You have to store the guns at the local police office until hunting season. Not sure if you have to take the gun back to the police station at the end of every hunting day, but I don't think so. I *think* you might have to pick up your brass/empty cartridges and account for them, but I'm not 100% sure of that. I can't think of a single shooting death over here, but there are probably a few.
0 Replies
 
H2O MAN
 
  0  
Reply Tue 29 Jan, 2013 07:33 am


Americans must not comply with anything that resembles a national registry of firearms.

It is the citizens duty not to comply.
H2O MAN
 
  0  
Reply Tue 29 Jan, 2013 07:54 am
http://polymontana.com/files/2013/01/BackgroundCheckObama.jpg
H2O MAN
 
  1  
Reply Tue 29 Jan, 2013 08:22 am


Press Ignores Lives Saved Because Of Firearms
parados
 
  1  
Reply Tue 29 Jan, 2013 08:26 am
@H2O MAN,
Based on no facts that can be verified? Really? That is the best that you guys have?
H2O MAN
 
  1  
Reply Tue 29 Jan, 2013 08:30 am
@parados,
The facts have overwhelmed you guys
Frank Apisa
 
  0  
Reply Tue 29 Jan, 2013 08:33 am
@parados,
IF TRUE...the blurb that H2O posted indicates that in the 2 months since the Newtown shooting, 65,000 people with guns thought they were so threatened...they had to shoot someone.

Do you think it has more to do with the fact that they had guns...than that they actually were so threatened that a shooting had to occur?

Do you think, Parados, he actually cannot see the absurdity of what he posted?
parados
 
  1  
Reply Tue 29 Jan, 2013 08:35 am
@H2O MAN,
That must be why you presented your evidence on how many people wounded with guns are in self defense.

Meanwhile 25% of those wounded with guns are accidental and almost 75% are from assaults. Funny thing about that number it's less than 1/2% that are legal defense.
0 Replies
 
parados
 
  1  
Reply Tue 29 Jan, 2013 08:35 am
@Frank Apisa,
The claim isn't that they were shot. It's that they had to wave the gun around or something.
0 Replies
 
spendius
 
  1  
Reply Tue 29 Jan, 2013 08:40 am
@H2O MAN,
Quote:
It is the citizens duty not to comply.


It is a citizens duty to obey the law. Not that I can honestly say, with hand on heart, that I have always done so.

I once bought a bottle of milk on a Sunday which, in those less liberal times, was an arrestable offence under the various holdovers and ordinances, which had lingered on in the fusty chambers of our eminent legal offices from ye olden times, when the Day of the Lord was strictly observed and famines, pestilences, disease and war were often visited upon the underlying population: (the missionary position so the speak), and,occasionally, Constitutions written on parchment curling at the edges and slightly foxed due to various stains of unknown origin.

I sneaked it, the pint of milk, an oblect, being white, (we were still on bottles then), which was thus easily spotted, out of the shop wrapped in a copy of "Over 40s" and conveyed it to my residence where I poured it into a saucepan, heated it up, added ten tablespoons of Brazilian coffee and a glug or two of brandy, decanted the mixture into two cups and went back to bed.

There was no football on Sunday either.

So the sociologists among us can see from that the distance we are capable of traveling in the short span of my own journey through this weary world of woe and tribulation.

I suppose, if the NRA have their way, restrictions on guns will go the way of the Sunday Observance regulations and it will be quite normal for us to shoot down anyone who comes within range on the grounds that they might present a threat to our personal safety. After all, a large number of victims have been gunned down by people who were not suspected of being a threat. So it might be better to be safe than be sorry. We could have wing mirrors fitted to our heads so we could detect potential threats from the rear.






BillRM
 
  1  
Reply Tue 29 Jan, 2013 08:47 am
@spendius,
Quote:
It is a citizens duty to obey the law. Not that I can honestly say, with hand on heart, that I have always done so.


If US citizens had always feel that way we would still be part of the English Empire.

An as in Germany in the 1930s-40s it sometime the clear duty of citizens to disobey the laws of their nation.

In fact we hung people for obeying their nations laws after WW2.
0 Replies
 
H2O MAN
 
  1  
Reply Tue 29 Jan, 2013 08:48 am
@spendius,
spendius wrote:

Quote:
It is the citizens duty not to comply.


It is a citizens duty to obey the law.


Not a law that's unconstitutional.

BillRM
 
  2  
Reply Tue 29 Jan, 2013 08:51 am
@H2O MAN,
Quote:
Not a law that's unconstitutional.


Or morality wrong such as the jim crow laws of the south existing up into the 1960s.
H2O MAN
 
  1  
Reply Tue 29 Jan, 2013 08:53 am
@BillRM,
Correct.

It's clear that the left does not have their finger on the pulse of America.
Obama and his ilk are attempting to install a series of rigid anti-American laws that are virtually unenforceable.
0 Replies
 
FBM
 
  -2  
Reply Tue 29 Jan, 2013 08:56 am
@H2O MAN,
H2O MAN wrote:

http://polymontana.com/files/2013/01/BackgroundCheckObama.jpg


Alright, whatever credibility you may have had remaining is gone with the wind now.
H2O MAN
 
  1  
Reply Tue 29 Jan, 2013 09:01 am
@FBM,
Well, that's your opinion - flawed as it is, you have the right to express it.
FBM
 
  2  
Reply Tue 29 Jan, 2013 09:10 am
@H2O MAN,
Thank you. And I respect your right to express whatever you feel the need to, no matter how much I disagree with it. :cheers:
0 Replies
 
Frank Apisa
 
  0  
Reply Tue 29 Jan, 2013 09:11 am
@H2O MAN,
Quote:
Quote:
Re: spendius (Post 5239188)
spendius wrote:

Quote:
It is the citizens duty not to comply.


It is a citizens duty to obey the law.


Not a law that's unconstitutional.


And the Constitution says that YOU are to decide which laws are constitutional or not???

Which section is that in?
H2O MAN
 
  1  
Reply Tue 29 Jan, 2013 09:18 am
@Frank Apisa,
It's in the section you and Obama are ignoring.
 

Related Topics

 
Copyright © 2024 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 5.22 seconds on 11/23/2024 at 05:53:10