1
   

A truly cruel college squeeze

 
 
au1929
 
Reply Sat 6 Mar, 2004 10:29 am
By Mortimer B. Zuckerman • Editor-in-Chief
A truly cruel college squeeze

This is rapidly becoming the unequal opportunity society. Young people face a double whammy: Colleges are harder to get into, and only the well-off can afford a college education these days. The numbers could not be more clear. A mere 4.5 percent of young people from the lowest income quartile get a B.A. degree by the age of 24; 12 percent from the next quartile get one; 25 percent from the third quartile, and 51 percent of students in the top quartile. Could it be that America is now resegregating higher education, only this time not by color but by class?

States are struggling with big budget deficits. In turn, they are forcing cuts on public colleges and state universities, which educate 80 percent of our students. The schools are cutting costs by reducing education programs and limiting enrollment, and, critically, they are raising their fees. In public four-year colleges and universities, average tuition is up 14 percent, to $4,694. That marks the second straight year of huge tuition increases, according to the College Board. The total cost for tuition, room, and board now averages $10,636, up $950 from about a year ago. This is roughly one sixth of the total pretax income for the average middle-class family and 70 percent of yearly incomes for low-income families (which is up from 40 percent in 1976). Footing the bill. Even community colleges suffered a 14 percent increase in tuitions. The federal Pell Grant for low-income students, which 25 years ago covered almost half of their total costs, now covers only about a fifth of typical college costs, even as the maximum grant amount tripled. Once, the maximum Pell Grant covered 84 percent of costs at a public, four-year college; today it covers just 39 percent, while the maximum federally subsidized student loan has stayed the same for a decade. More and more middle-class kids are struggling to fund their college tuition through a package of family money, loans, or grants. Families are being forced to scour the open market because of the caps on federal subsidies. The result is that during the past two years alone, nonsubsidized bank lending to students shot up 41 percent, to $7.5 billion. Such trends are distressing. Four-year tuitions at in-state colleges have jumped a staggering 85 percent in the past decade, and at community colleges, 53 percent. The U.S. Department of Education estimates that 170,000 qualified students could not even afford to attend a community college this year, and 43 percent of qualified middle-class youngsters can't afford to go to a four-year school. Their options are limited to local community colleges. Meanwhile, schools are overwhelmed with almost 16 million students, a record. Even students with good grades are being denied admittance. This problem--this injustice--is not going to go away, as the children of baby boomers reach college age and as immigrants and laid-off workers look to enhance their skills. Politicians know this is a hot issue. Americans overwhelmingly agree that a college degree is the single most important factor affecting a young person's chance of success. Nine of 10 parents believe that a college education is as important as a high school diploma used to be. Over 75 percent believe that getting a college education is more important than it was just 10 years ago. So the Democrats are scrambling to address this issue. Sen. John Edwards is offering a free year of college. Former Gov. Howard Dean wanted to guarantee $10,000 a year in college loans; Sen. John Kerry has proposed a four-year degree free, in exchange for two years of public service. These are interesting ideas; they need to be fleshed out with more detail.
Where's all the money going to come from? Raising Pell Grants to cover this year's average increases in tuition, room, and board would cost about $4.6 billion. Raising the lifetime borrowing limit of $23,000 to $30,000, with Washington paying the interest on loans to needy students when they're in school, would cost the government $20 billion over 10 years, according to the Congressional Budget Office. In the meantime, parents are going more deeply into debt. Every year, more than a million families take out a second mortgage on their homes just to pay for education for their kids. So, just at the time when the jobs of the future will require more knowledge and technical talents, we face a situation in which getting a college degree is largely determined by the financial well-being of parents.


For a society that believes and offers equal opportunity to those people who play by the rules, this is a disgrace. We must mobilize the political will to invest in the real future of America, namely, in the education of our young.

This Is a pressing problem for the future of America. Who do you think Kerry or Bush is more likely to honestly address it. Any thoughts on ow it should be addressed?
  • Topic Stats
  • Top Replies
  • Link to this Topic
Type: Discussion • Score: 1 • Views: 2,172 • Replies: 38
No top replies

 
hobitbob
 
  1  
Reply Sat 6 Mar, 2004 10:53 am
And to add to the mess, many states, like Colorado, have slashed higher ed budgets to the bare minimum. The Republicans in the state are pushing for a referendum that would allow voters to decide if public colleges and universities should be completely removed from public funding. This should be viewed with a certain amount of alarm, since we have one of the worst records of all the states as far as sending HS gras to college. If the referendum passes (and I have no doubt that it will, since this is being marketed as a way for the state budget to be trimmed, and people honestly believe that tuition raises will cover costs) it may lead to the eventual death of higher ed in this state. As it is, tuition was raised 4% at states institutions this year, and a raise of up to 10% is being considered for next fall. With the awful economy here in Colorado (where our governor is proving to be a prime "Bushchen" by squandering a budget surplus on entering office, and cutting business deals for his friends, while sponsoring efforts by the state Repubs to cut healthcare, education, etc...) many families can barely afford to pay $3000.00 or so per year for public universities, let alone however much the cost is likely to rise in the next five years.
0 Replies
 
Acquiunk
 
  1  
Reply Sat 6 Mar, 2004 11:25 am
Odd has it sounds, increasingly this economy does not need a well educated population. The spread of universal education world wide is creating a global educated work force that makes the American higher educational system, designed in the last 75 years at least for mass education increasingly redundant. Equally well educated people can be found else ware at a much lower cost. This society is moving toward a structure that is more similar to Mexico than the one we have been used to. A wealthy well educated elite, a small and unstable middle class and a general population which has just enough education to perform as needed. As a result I doubt the Collage/University system in this country will look anything like the system that has been in place since WWII. It will be smaller, more private, and less diverse.
0 Replies
 
au1929
 
  1  
Reply Sat 6 Mar, 2004 11:44 am
Acquiunk
Forgive me if I am wrong but are you suggesting that we are moving to a third world structure. Wealthy elite, small middle class and the peasant poor. I would say that would lead to a second American revolution.
During our great depression we had a somewhat similar situation and were not far from some sort of socialist political revolution. Note: Communism was selling.
0 Replies
 
hobitbob
 
  1  
Reply Sat 6 Mar, 2004 11:45 am
Lets hope it sells again!
0 Replies
 
Piffka
 
  1  
Reply Sat 6 Mar, 2004 11:50 am
I heard a similar comment from a politician here -- "We don't need to educate more marine biologists," he said, "we need more service workers."

It took me by surprise.

Look at our economy though... a huge budget for the military at the Federal level. At the state level... lots of money for K-12 schools. What's a kid to do when choosing a career - go with his or her interests and look at the situation with open eyes?
0 Replies
 
au1929
 
  1  
Reply Sat 6 Mar, 2004 11:50 am
hobitbob

Quote:
Lets hope it sells again!


Let's hope not the cure being worse than the disease
0 Replies
 
hobitbob
 
  1  
Reply Sat 6 Mar, 2004 12:41 pm
au1929 wrote:
hobitbob

Quote:
Lets hope it sells again!


Let's hope not the cure being worse than the disease

Grammatically speaking, the strongest response to the "why do we need edumacashins fer enywayz?" question. Rolling Eyes
0 Replies
 
au1929
 
  1  
Reply Sat 6 Mar, 2004 12:46 pm
hobitbob
Sorry but you have me completely confused. Confused
0 Replies
 
hobitbob
 
  1  
Reply Sat 6 Mar, 2004 12:50 pm
Not terribly difficult, is it? Wink
Anyway, I hate to do so, but I agree with Acquiunk on this one. Yes, the US is headed toward the developing world model, especially if the group of immoral criminals currently in charge remain in charge. They are playing into the "workin' mayun's" distrust of education, and allowing the lower class to participate in their own subjugation. Sad and disgusting at the same time.
0 Replies
 
Acquiunk
 
  1  
Reply Sat 6 Mar, 2004 12:53 pm
au1929 wrote:
we are moving to a third world structure.


Possibly. The US is not Mexico, we have a much different history so we will end up looking some what different.

"that would lead to a second American revolution".

Probably not. It has been my, possibly paranoid, opinion that the Patriot Act has little or nothing to do with terrorism. The people who are running both the congress and the executive have an agenda that will take this country back to something that looks socially like the late 19th century. There will be social unrest as that program begins to "bite", (and it is just beginning to) The Patriot Act IMHO is designed to address the problems this agenda will invariably create.
0 Replies
 
hobitbob
 
  1  
Reply Sat 6 Mar, 2004 12:59 pm
NOW with Bill Moyers addressed the re-intrusionof local and FBI agents into social activism groups last night. I was one of the demonstrators arrested last March, and met one of the undercover cops in question.
I wonder, are we headed for similar labour/management crises as marked mid to later 19th century England? IN addition, where could one immigrate to, to better one's position? Might an exodus to India or Central America begin?
0 Replies
 
Acquiunk
 
  1  
Reply Sat 6 Mar, 2004 01:05 pm
It already has. One of the functions of empire is to allow people, particularly marginal elites or really competitive non elites an arena to repair or make their fortunes without challenging established elites in the core. Think of all those 18th and 19th century adventure novel where the hero retires to where ever (England, France...) in comfort I know Americans that are doing this, successfully. Empire and immigration are part of the program.
0 Replies
 
au1929
 
  1  
Reply Sat 6 Mar, 2004 01:10 pm
Acquiunk
Are you intimating that the patriot act is similar to the laws used by the Gestapo to protect fascism's excesses?
0 Replies
 
hobitbob
 
  1  
Reply Sat 6 Mar, 2004 01:13 pm
If he isn't, I am.
0 Replies
 
Acquiunk
 
  1  
Reply Sat 6 Mar, 2004 01:55 pm
Yes
0 Replies
 
Umbagog
 
  1  
Reply Sat 6 Mar, 2004 02:23 pm
"Could it be that America is now resegregating higher education, only this time not by color but by class?"
Quote:


This is an important question, and it is absolutely fundamental to the neocon ideology which very much insists upon a rigid class structure based on the pyramid form. The base is the mass population of peasants that must defer to the superiority of the elite minority at the tip of the hierarchy.

Is there a quicker way to make the masses poor than by pricing them out of the education market, therefore pushing them down into a servile and low wage status?

Look at everything Bush is doing, and you will see he is working very hard to create a class structure in this country.
0 Replies
 
Umbagog
 
  1  
Reply Sat 6 Mar, 2004 02:33 pm
"[The Patriot Act IMHO is designed to address the problems this agenda will invariably create."]

Yes indeed. The crack-down made possible by the Patriot Act is for domestic control, not national security. As poverty spreads, there will indeed be massive protests and violence, don't think there won't be. The Patriot Act will allow for the suppression of the protesting.

I don't think it will work though. Americans are more resistant than they appear to be. They may be sleeping right now, but poke the beast too many times, and it will come out roaring.

The stage is being set for some serious change in this country, and we are in fact trying to go back to the old world structure of hierarchy and peasant masses. There was no middle class at all in that system, and that is the goal.

The irony here is that public education is what made this country economically great. Without it, we not only will resemble a third world nation, but we will be as economically depressed as a third world nation as well. Hierachies never create greatness out of ignorant peasants doing as they are told. Look at China. They are only starting to advance now that they are starting to open up a little.

The guys thinking their hierarchy will create an American Empire are in for a rude shock. The very things they think stand in the way are the very things that are allowing for our greatness.

Such is the nature of the human race. They don't understand the world in which they live, and the answers they come up with are based on superstition, prejudice and fear, not facts and science.

We once were on the path to enlightenment, but the torch has been stubbed out, and now we decline as the darkness gathers....unless we suddenly wake up somehow and start demanding that we legislate in reality, not ideology.

Good luck getting them to admit they don't have a clue about leading us into the future. They are after power, not enlightenment, and that is the oldest game on the planet.
0 Replies
 
Umbagog
 
  1  
Reply Sat 6 Mar, 2004 02:40 pm
And if you think there won't be a revolution in this country, you apparently have absolutely no real education in the history of the world over the past 4,000 years. Revolutions break out routinely because the powers that be are always trying to make themselves impervious to the masses they try to oppress. I can't even count how many times it has happened in this world, but for the love of God, wake up, eh? Even America wasn't the last revolution in modern times. Most of the continent of Africa has been revolting for some time now. Americans, so full of desire and violence will make formidable revolutionaries once their collective anger is aroused. It IS coming. It's just a matter of when, and I am not expert enough to be able to predict...but with the escalation taking place under the Bush administration, I'd say within another 5 admins, if more of this goes on, if the imperial presidency keeps trying to consolidate its power over us, and if we do not advance in our causes, you can be sure a lot of burning and killing is going to break out. Revolution may be THE MOST Dependable historical event there is.
0 Replies
 
Umbagog
 
  1  
Reply Sat 6 Mar, 2004 02:44 pm
I'm sorry to bring this bad news to you, but I did not create the world, I had no choice to be born into it, and I've struggled to understand it ever since I realized what a world is in the first place. Dismiss the messenger if you will, but we are not separated out from the ongoing world history we find ourselves in. We are very much still a part of it, and still subject to its forces over which we have little, if any control. We don't even understand the planet itself, never mind what we are doing to it, and ourselves. We blindly build up our civilizations, and they just as fast come crashing back down because our science is inadequate to the task.

The word, modern, is a misnomer. Sure, tech has advanced, but we are still primitive savages with no control over anything really, in the long run. Security is still an illusion, and preparedness is still totally absent.
0 Replies
 
 

Related Topics

Obama '08? - Discussion by sozobe
Let's get rid of the Electoral College - Discussion by Robert Gentel
McCain's VP: - Discussion by Cycloptichorn
Food Stamp Turkeys - Discussion by H2O MAN
The 2008 Democrat Convention - Discussion by Lash
McCain is blowing his election chances. - Discussion by McGentrix
Snowdon is a dummy - Discussion by cicerone imposter
TEA PARTY TO AMERICA: NOW WHAT?! - Discussion by farmerman
 
  1. Forums
  2. » A truly cruel college squeeze
Copyright © 2024 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.03 seconds on 09/28/2024 at 02:35:30